Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleARTICLES

Predicting Treatment Outcome for Incompetent Defendants

Robert A. Nicholson, George W. Barnard, Lynn Robbins and Gary Hankins
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 1994, 22 (3) 367-377;
Robert A. Nicholson
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George W. Barnard
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn Robbins
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Hankins
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

This study examined the prediction of outcome in a sample of defendants hospitalized for treatment of incompetency. Defendants' demographic characteristics and scores on 18 scales of the Computer-Assisted Determination of Competency to Proceed instrument (CADCOMP) were used to predict competency restoration and length of stay (LOS). During the period of study, almost 90 percent of the defendants were restored to competency after a mean stay of over 280 days. Demographic characteristics were unrelated to outcome. Several CADCOMP scales, including two scales measuring psycholegal ability and one measuring psychopathology, were correlated with both outcome criteria. Discriminant analysis using the CADCOMP scales accurately classified 76.7 percent of the defendants into short and long stay groups. Although promising, the findings are nevertheless consistent with prior research in suggesting that examiners should exercise caution in providing feedback to the courts concerning competency restoration and the period of time needed for treatment.

  • Copyright © 1994, The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 22 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 22, Issue 3
1 Sep 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting Treatment Outcome for Incompetent Defendants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Predicting Treatment Outcome for Incompetent Defendants
Robert A. Nicholson, George W. Barnard, Lynn Robbins, Gary Hankins
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 1994, 22 (3) 367-377;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Predicting Treatment Outcome for Incompetent Defendants
Robert A. Nicholson, George W. Barnard, Lynn Robbins, Gary Hankins
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 1994, 22 (3) 367-377;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Tales of the Crypt for Psychiatrists: Mourning, Melancholia, and Mortuary Malpractice
  • A Clinical Study of Competency in Psychiatric Inpatients
  • Capacity to Consent to Voluntary Hospitalization: Searching for a Satisfactory Zinermon Screen
Show more ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law