Perceptions of Psychiatric Testimony: A Historical Perspective on the Hysterical Invective

  • Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
  • September 1986,
  • 14
  • (3)
  • 203-219;

Abstract

This paper discusses the perceptions of psychiatric testimony by the public, lawyers, and psychiatrists. Five major criticisms are put into historical perspective: psychiatrists excuse sin; psychiatrists always disagree; psychiatrists give confusing, subjective, uninformed, jargon-ridden testimony; psychiatrists dictate the law; psychiatrists give conclusory opinions. Proposed solutions to these criticisms are analyzed.

Footnotes

  • This paper is a revision or the Presidential Address to the American Academy or Psychiatry and the Law. October 10. 1985. in Albuquerque. New Mexico.

Loading
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Article Alerts
  • Email Article
  • Citation Tools
  • Request Permissions
  • Share