Abstract
In United States v. Lyons (1984), the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court altered its definition of legal insanity to conform with recent recommendations of the American Bar Association and the American Psychiatric Association. This paper briefly reviews the social and legal context of the Court’s ruling. The author then discusses the insanity defense’s rationale and suggests an interpretation of the Court’s new definition that should guide psychiatric testimony.
Footnotes
-
Dr. Mossman is an instructor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-0742. Address reprint requests to Dr. Mossman.
- Copyright © 1988, The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
