Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleARTICLES

Involuntary Patients’ Right to Refuse Medication: Impact of the Riese Decision on a California Inpatient Unit

Renée L. Binder and Dale E. McNiel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 1991, 19 (4) 351-357;
Renée L. Binder
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dale E. McNiel
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

On June 22, 1989, the California Supreme Court allowed the Appellate Court decision in the right to refuse treatment case, Riese v, St. Mary’s Hospital to stand. The court ruled that absent a judicial determination of incompetence, antipsychotic drugs cannot be administered to involuntarily committed mental patients in non-emergency situations without their informed consent. Much concern was expressed by the California Psychiatric Association and the California Alliance for the Mentally III about the decision’s negative impact on patient care. In this paper, the authors review the decision, elucidate the anticipated concerns about the impact of the decision, and then describe the decision’s actual impact on an acute inpatient unit in California. The authors report that Riese hearings were held on 7 percent of admissions to their locked inpatient facility. Only 1 percent of the patients were found to be competent to refuse medications. The authors give clinical examples of patients who were affected by the Riese decision and review the benefits and risks of this decision from the perspective of actual clinical practice.

  • Copyright © 1991, The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 19 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 19, Issue 4
1 Dec 1991
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Involuntary Patients’ Right to Refuse Medication: Impact of the Riese Decision on a California Inpatient Unit
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Involuntary Patients’ Right to Refuse Medication: Impact of the Riese Decision on a California Inpatient Unit
Renée L. Binder, Dale E. McNiel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 1991, 19 (4) 351-357;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Involuntary Patients’ Right to Refuse Medication: Impact of the Riese Decision on a California Inpatient Unit
Renée L. Binder, Dale E. McNiel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 1991, 19 (4) 351-357;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Tales of the Crypt for Psychiatrists: Mourning, Melancholia, and Mortuary Malpractice
  • A Clinical Study of Competency in Psychiatric Inpatients
  • Capacity to Consent to Voluntary Hospitalization: Searching for a Satisfactory Zinermon Screen
Show more ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law