Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleARTICLES

The Biases of Child Sexual Abuse Experts: Believing is Seeing

Thomas M. Horner, Melvin J. Guyer and Neil M. Kalter
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 1993, 21 (3) 281-292;
Thomas M. Horner
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melvin J. Guyer
Ph.D., J.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil M. Kalter
Ph.D.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Experts in clinical evaluations of child sexual abuse were studied using a paradigm that requested them to estimate the likelihood of a 3-year-old child having been sexually molested by her father, as alleged by her mother, when she was two years old. All of the experts claimed special qualifications and experience in the field of diagnosing and treating child sexual abuse victims. Expert-respondents provided two estimates of the likelihood that the child had been molested, the first following a detailed presentation of the clinical case by the actual evaluator of the child (the presentation included opportunities to ask questions ad libitum beyond the presentation material), the second following an extensive discussion of the clinical material with other child experts present. The range of estimated likelihoods that the child had been molested was extreme among the expert respondents. The clinical conference format that was used seemed to provide the experts with no apparent means for eliminating or reducing differences in their clinical opinions. Recommendations concerning how the supervising court should regulate further child-father contacts were similarly varied. The implications of these findings for judicial acceptance of expert testimony in cases of alleged child sexual abuse are discussed.

  • Copyright © 1993, The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 21 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 21, Issue 3
1 Sep 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Biases of Child Sexual Abuse Experts: Believing is Seeing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Biases of Child Sexual Abuse Experts: Believing is Seeing
Thomas M. Horner, Melvin J. Guyer, Neil M. Kalter
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 1993, 21 (3) 281-292;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Biases of Child Sexual Abuse Experts: Believing is Seeing
Thomas M. Horner, Melvin J. Guyer, Neil M. Kalter
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 1993, 21 (3) 281-292;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prearraignment Forensic Evaluations: Toward a New Policy
  • Trading Forensic and Family Commitments
  • Postconcussional Disorder and Loss of Consciousness
Show more ARTICLES

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law