Public Evaluations of Unrepresented Defendants

  • Robert D. Miller
  • Jonathan Olin
  • Gary Beven
  • and Jonathan Covey
  • Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
  • March 1995,
  • 23
  • (1)
  • 93-103;

Abstract

Previous articles have addressed the ethical and legal issues involved when private psychiatrists perform forensic evaluations on criminal defendants before the defendants have access to counsel; but there have been few studies addressing evaluations requested through public facilities and by clinicians other than psychiatrists. The authors present the results of a detailed study of defendants admitted for evaluations of competency to proceed to a forensic inpatient unit in one state, as well as data from a national survey of state forensic facilities. The studies were designed to measure the incidence of unrepresented defendants in a population referred for competency evaluation, as well as to examine the reasons for such occurrences. The data reveal that court-ordered evaluations of unrepresented defendants are rare, but continue to exist.

Footnotes

  • Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the AAPL, San Antonio, TX, October 24, 1993.

View Abstract
Loading
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Article Alerts
  • Email Article
  • Citation Tools
  • Request Permissions