Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherJOURNAL ARTICLE

Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants

SE Riley
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 1998, 26 (2) 223-240;
SE Riley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Competency to stand trial adjudication is a decision point in the criminal justice system at which gender bias may result in different outcomes for female defendants as compared with males. However, this is an unexplored research area that lacks well-designed studies. The goals of this investigation, which used the largest known sample of U.S. female competency to stand trial defendants studied thus far, are to further understand this group of offenders and to address the gender bias issue as observed in a major southwestern urban court system. Multivariate logistic regression analyses on selected data for 157 female defendants and 187 of their male counterparts examined (1) variations within gender categories and (2) differences between men and women. The results of the within models showed some similarities, but also clear differences, in the determinants of court dispositions. The analyses failed to show an overall pattern of association between gender and competency adjudication. The influence of gender showed considerable variability across psychotic symptoms involving hallucinations and/or delusions: women with psychotic symptomatology were at high risk of being adjudicated incompetent. This study demonstrates how reliable data on female competency to stand trial defendants can assist the interface of the mental health and criminal justice systems in their adherence to the legal standard of competency. It also highlights the following research needs: (1) increased sample sizes of female evaluees; and (2) richer data sets with more and better information on how gender influences specific psychotic symptomatology, type of crime, and legally functional abilities.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 26 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 26, Issue 2
1 Jun 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants
SE Riley
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 1998, 26 (2) 223-240;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Competency to stand trial adjudication: a comparison of female and male defendants
SE Riley
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 1998, 26 (2) 223-240;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Police responses to persons with mental illness: does the label matter?
  • Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological, educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles awaiting execution in Texas
  • Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law