Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherJOURNAL ARTICLE

The psychologically vulnerable witness: an emerging forensic consulting role

RI Simon
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2001, 29 (1) 33-41;
RI Simon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The role of witness consultant is emerging as forensic psychiatrists and psychologists provide valuable input as participants in witness development teams. Anecdotally, retained experts also have undertaken a witness consultant role when asked or pressured to do so by the retaining attorney. Forensic psychiatrists and psychologists with extensive treatment and testimony experience may be of assistance to attorneys in preparing psychologically vulnerable clients and nonparty witnesses to tell their stories effectively at trial. In addition to litigation, other venues of witness consultation include administrative, congressional, and state legislative proceedings. In litigation, the witness consultant works directly with the attorney in support of the attorney's counselor role with the client. As an agent of the attorney, the identity of the witness consultant is shielded by the attorney-client privilege. The witness consultant does not meet face to face with the witness unless otherwise indicated. Collateral sources of information are used in providing witness consultation. The witness consultant can identify and provide management techniques for the psychological issues that threaten to impair a witness's ability to testify effectively. The consultant also may be able to assist the attorney who is experiencing difficulty in his or her relationship with a client or a nonparty witness.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 29 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 29, Issue 1
1 Mar 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The psychologically vulnerable witness: an emerging forensic consulting role
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The psychologically vulnerable witness: an emerging forensic consulting role
RI Simon
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2001, 29 (1) 33-41;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The psychologically vulnerable witness: an emerging forensic consulting role
RI Simon
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2001, 29 (1) 33-41;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Police responses to persons with mental illness: does the label matter?
  • Ethics questions raised by the neuropsychiatric, neuropsychological, educational, developmental, and family characteristics of 18 juveniles awaiting execution in Texas
  • Missouri overrules the United States Supreme Court on capital punishment for minors
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law