Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherJOURNAL ARTICLE

Patterns of denial in sex offenders: a replication study

P Gibbons, J de Volder and P Casey
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2003, 31 (3) 336-344;
P Gibbons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J de Volder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P Casey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To assess whether a robust typology of sex offenders could be established based on the patterns of denial displayed, a previously developed semistructured interview method was used to assess denial in a mixed group of convicted rapists and child molesters. Cluster analysis was used to establish homogeneous groups of sex offenders based on the pattern of denial in each case, with a three-cluster solution emerging as the most appropriate, confirming previous research. The denial groups were compared in relation to objective offense characteristics to assess whether a consistent typology of offenders emerged. Each of the four groups of offenders identified (three groups emerging from the cluster analysis and an "absolute denier" group) corresponded closely with the previously identified typology. However, the authors failed to replicate previously identified differences between the denial groups in relation to independent variables such as offense type. Each group contained both rapists and child molesters and was found to differ quantitatively rather than qualitatively in the pattern of the denial expressed, with attributional style being the most consistent form of denial present in all groups. The authors conclude that denial consists of at least two continuous dimensions, rather than being a dichotomous phenomenon. Differences in the patterns of denial displayed by rapists and child molesters were found to be primarily quantitative rather than qualitative.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 31 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 31, Issue 3
1 Sep 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of denial in sex offenders: a replication study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patterns of denial in sex offenders: a replication study
P Gibbons, J de Volder, P Casey
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2003, 31 (3) 336-344;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Patterns of denial in sex offenders: a replication study
P Gibbons, J de Volder, P Casey
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2003, 31 (3) 336-344;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Sequestration of lay witnesses and experts
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder in the forensic psychiatric setting
  • Alcoholic blackout for criminally relevant behavior
Show more JOURNAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law