Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

Purpose and Utility of Child Custody Evaluations

The Attorney's Perspective

Erika M. Waller and Anasseril E. Daniel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2005, 33 (2) 199-207;
Erika M. Waller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anasseril E. Daniel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Attorney Perspectives on Seeking an Evaluation

    Item% Endorsing Truen
    I have represented clients in custody litigation/law suits.9859
    I have served as a guardian ad litem.9559
    I have sought an evaluation by a mental health professional as an advocate of the parent:9559
    I prefer to have all parties involved in the evaluation [versus just one parent or the child(ren)].9558
    I have sought an evaluation by a mental health professional as an advocate of the child.8359
    A mental health professional is the best person to conduct a custody evaluation.7352
    In custody litigation, joint custody is most commonly sought.6156
    In custody litigation, sole custody is most commonly sought.4055
    In custody litigation, modification of custody is most commonly sought.3354
    In custody litigation, change of visitation is most commonly sought.2853
    Obtaining an evaluation is limited by the following factors:
        Lack of resources of clients9859
        Excessive cost8658
        Lack of available experts6458
        Lack of faith in such evaluation2357
        Undue delay in completing the evaluation1656
    The following individuals usually respond unfavorably to the request for a custody evaluation:
        Custodial parent4753
        Mother2553
        Father2254
        Noncustodial parent1554
        Child(ren)1052
    A custody evaluation usually helps the child(ren).8354
    A custody evaluation usually has little impact on the child(ren).4053
    A custody evaluation usually harms the child(ren).253
    It is my opinion that custody award should be guided by:
        Best-interest standard9556
        Preference for joint custody6253
        Preference for sole custody to the more suitable parent1251
        Tender-years presumption (young children should go to mothers)453
    • Percentages have been rounded.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Attorney Evaluation Process Expectations and Perceived Utility

    Item% Endorsing Truen
    I expect the following from the evaluation:
        Review of pertinent medical/psychological records10054
        Interview of the parent(s)10056
        Interview of the child(ren)10056
        Interview of significant others (e.g., stepparents)9856
        Assessment of the parent-child relationship (e.g., interaction observation)9856
        Provision of a written report9856
        Parenting skills assessment9656
        Psychological testing of the parent(s) (e.g., personality testing)9154
        Psychological testing of the child(ren)8953
        Participation in deposition or court testimony8956
        Substance abuse assessment8856
        Assessment of child's parental preference8455
        Review of pertinent legal documents6954
        Provision of a verbal summary6856
        Drug screening6554
        Psychological testing of significant others6552
    I expect the following from the evaluation report:
        Description of the quality of the parent-child relationship10056
        Description of the psychological/psychiatric functioning of the parent(s)9855
        Description of the psychological/psychiatric functioning of the child(ren)9654
        Determination of whether abuse has occurred9155
        Clear unequivocal recommendation as to the custody/visitation7556
    I find the following parts of the report helpful:
        Conclusions/summary (e.g., diagnoses)10059
        Recommendations regarding custody/visitation9556
        Recommendations regarding psychological/psychiatric treatment9557
        Background information regarding the parent(s) and/or child(ren)9158
        Qualitative (i.e., verbal) findings of psychological testing9158
        Specific recommendations regarding visitation schedule8455
        Quantitative (i.e., numerical) findings of psychological testing7957
        Background information regarding the separation/divorce and custody/visitation dispute7756
    The evaluation plays a large role in my determination to proceed to trial or negotiate a settlement8956
    I generally use the report to negotiate a settlement8154
    I generally use the report to proceed to trial6253
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Descriptive Statistics Regarding Rankings of Factors That Prompt Child Custody Evaluations

    FactorMean RankingRangen
    Sexual abuse allegations2.96 (2.37)1–1054
    Physical abuse or neglect allegations2.98 (1.74)1–954
    Parental fitness (mental illness/alcoholism/instability)3.12 (1.67)1–755
    Parental conflict/lack of compliance with court orders4.41 (2.07)1–1153
    Clear bias of the child/alienation issues4.53 (2.27)1–1052
    Domestic violence5.12 (1.90)2–1054
    Unclear child preference7.74 (2.43)1–1150
    Parental relocation7.90 (2.11)1–1150
    Parental remarriage issues8.26 (1.71)2–1150
    Parental sexual orientation8.42 (2.87)1–1149
    Grandparent or adoption issues9.38 (1.75)5–1150
    • Data in parentheses are standard deviations.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 33 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 33, Issue 2
1 Jun 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Purpose and Utility of Child Custody Evaluations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Purpose and Utility of Child Custody Evaluations
Erika M. Waller, Anasseril E. Daniel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2005, 33 (2) 199-207;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Purpose and Utility of Child Custody Evaluations
Erika M. Waller, Anasseril E. Daniel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2005, 33 (2) 199-207;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Method
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law