Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

The New Research Ethic: Will Oversight Requirements Sink Forensic Research?

Philip J. Candilis, Rasim Arikan, Sheila B. Noone and Jacob C. Holzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2005, 33 (3) 361-367;
Philip J. Candilis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rasim Arikan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheila B. Noone
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob C. Holzer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 33 no. 3 361-367
PubMed 
16186201

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online September 26, 2005.

Copyright & Usage 
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Philip J. Candilis, MD,
  2. Rasim Arikan, MD,
  3. Sheila B. Noone, PhD and
  4. Jacob C. Holzer, MD
  1. Dr. Candilis and Dr. Holzer are Assistant Professors of Psychiatry, and Dr. Noone is Director of Clinical Research Operations and Oversight, Office of Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA. Dr. Arikan is attending psychiatrist at Worcester State Hospital, Worcester, MA
  1. Address correspondence to: Philip J. Candilis, MD, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655. E-mail: philip.candilis{at}umassmed.edu

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 33 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 33, Issue 3
1 Sep 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The New Research Ethic: Will Oversight Requirements Sink Forensic Research?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The New Research Ethic: Will Oversight Requirements Sink Forensic Research?
Philip J. Candilis, Rasim Arikan, Sheila B. Noone, Jacob C. Holzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2005, 33 (3) 361-367;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The New Research Ethic: Will Oversight Requirements Sink Forensic Research?
Philip J. Candilis, Rasim Arikan, Sheila B. Noone, Jacob C. Holzer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2005, 33 (3) 361-367;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Recent Problems in Research Oversight
    • New Standards for Research Oversight
    • Response of Psychiatric Organizations
    • Funding the New Oversight Movement
    • Conclusions
    • Addendum
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law