Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherSPECIAL ARTICLE

Assessing Presidential Stalkers and Assassins

Robert T. M. Phillips
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2006, 34 (2) 154-164;
Robert T. M. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Comparison of Clarke Typology and the Exceptional Case Study Project

    ClarkeECSP
    Attackers onlyAttackers and approachers
    TypologyNo typology
    Offers some comparative understandingOffers little comparative understanding
    Focus on attempted and successful assassinations onlyFocus on attempted and successful assassinations only
    No White House casesNo White House cases
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Five Descriptive Categories of Presidential Stalkers or Assassins

    MotiveDelusional Thinking or Active PsychosisHarm IntentAnimus Toward POTUS*
    ResentfulRetributionNoneYesYes
    Pathologically obsessedRetribution orPersonal gainPersecutory orGrandioseYesYes (Retribution)No (Personal gain)
    Infamy seekerPolitical statementNoneYesNot necessarily
    Intimacy seekerRealization of fanaticized relationshipErotomanicNoNo
    NuisanceTo provide help to or seek help from the PresidentGrandiose, narcissistic, or dependent; may be actively psychoticNoNo
    or
    Attention seekerTo see or be seen with the PresidentNoneNoNo
    • * President of the United States.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 34 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 34, Issue 2
June 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing Presidential Stalkers and Assassins
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Assessing Presidential Stalkers and Assassins
Robert T. M. Phillips
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2006, 34 (2) 154-164;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Assessing Presidential Stalkers and Assassins
Robert T. M. Phillips
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2006, 34 (2) 154-164;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Comparing and Integrating the Existing Classifications
    • Case Examples
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • AAPL Practice Guideline for Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Defendants Raising the Insanity Defense
  • But He Knew It Was Wrong: Evaluating Adolescent Culpability
  • Commentary: Building a Developmental-Ecological Model of Criminal Culpability During Adolescence
Show more SPECIAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law