Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

Commentary: Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Robert P. Granacher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2008, 36 (3) 323-328;
Robert P. Granacher Jr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Variant 1: Minor or Mild Acute Closed Head Injury (GCS ≥ 13), Without Risk Factors or Neurologic Deficit*

    Radiologic Exam ProcedureAppropriateness RatingComments
    CT, head, without contrast7Known to be low-yield
    X-ray and/or CT, cervical spine5
    MRI, head, without contrast4
    CT, head, without and with contrast3
    CTA, head and neck3Rarely indicated with mild trauma
    CT, head, without and with contrast2
    INV, cerebral angiography1
    NUC, SPECT1
    PET1
    CT, head, xenon-enhanced1
    US, transcranial Doppler1
    • Appropriateness Criteria Scale: 1 = least appropriate; 9 = most appropriate. CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CTA, computed tomographic angiography; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography; US, ultrasound; MRA, magnetic resonance angiography; INV, invasive; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    • * Head Trauma: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for Neuroimaging.23

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Variant 2: Minor or Mild Acute Closed Head Injury, Focal Neurologic Deficit and/or Risk Factors*

    Radiologic Exam ProcedureAppropriateness RatingComments
    CT, head, without contrast9
    MRI, head, without contrast6For problem solving
    X-ray and/or CT, cervical spine6
    MRA, head and neck5If vascular injury is suspected; for problem solving
    CTA, head and neck5If vascular injury is suspected; for problem solving
    MRI, head, without and with contrast3
    CT, head, without and with contrast2
    INV, cerebral angiograph1
    NUC, SPECT1
    PET1
    CT, head, xenon-enhanced1
    US, transcranial Doppler1
    X-ray, skull1
    • Appropriateness Criteria Scale: 1 = least appropriate; 9 = most appropriate. Abbreviations are as defined in Table 1.

    • * Head Trauma: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for Neuroimaging.23

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Variant 5: Subacute or Chronic Closed Head Injury With Cognitive and/or Neurologic Deficit(s)*

    Radiologic Exam ProcedureAppropriateness RatingComments
    MRI, head, without contrast8
    CT, head, without contrast6
    MRA, head and neck4For selected cases
    CTA, head and neck4For selected cases
    NUC, SPECT4For selected cases
    PET4For selected cases
    MRI, head, without and with contrast3
    fMRI, head2
    X-ray, skull2
    X-ray and/or CT, cervical spine2Assuming there are no spinal neurologic deficits
    CT, head, without and with contrast2
    INV, cerebral angiography1
    CT, head, xenon-enhanced1
    US, transcranial Doppler1
    • Appropriateness Criteria Scale: 1 = least appropriate; 9 = most appropriate. Abbreviations are as defined in Table 1.

    • * Head Trauma: American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria for Neuroimaging.23

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 36 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 36, Issue 3
September 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Commentary: Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Commentary: Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Robert P. Granacher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 323-328;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Commentary: Applications of Functional Neuroimaging to Civil Litigation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Robert P. Granacher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 323-328;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Controversies Regarding Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Potential Pitfalls in the Forensic Application of Functional Neuroimaging to Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Summary
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law