Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

The Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittees: Three Decades of Decision-Making

Barbara E. McDermott, Charles L. Scott, David Busse, Felecia Andrade, Michelle Zozaya and Cameron D. Quanbeck
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2008, 36 (3) 329-336;
Barbara E. McDermott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles L. Scott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Busse
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felecia Andrade
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle Zozaya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cameron D. Quanbeck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Z-score differences in indicators between decades.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Items by Category

    Summary AreaIncluded Items
    Treatment complianceFollows rules
    Willing to work with CONREP
    Accepts need for medications
    Medication compliant
    Treatment responsivenessParticipates in treatment groups
    Free of symptoms
    Accepts treatment plan
    Has received maximum benefit
    Met discharge goals
    Illness responds to medications
    InsightInsight regarding instant offense
    Insight regarding mental illness
    Insight regarding reason for admission
    Shows remorse for victim
    Substance-related problemsNegative drug screens
    Takes responsibility for drug use
    Understands connection between drug use and crime/admission
    Has a relapse prevention plan
    Aggressive behaviorStatement by treatment team
    Statement by patient
    Statement of assault-free time period
    Structured risk assessmentsPCL-R
    HCR-20
    VRAG
    Other structured risk assessment
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Demographic/Clinical Characteristics of the Sample

    Characteristicsn (%) or M (SD)
    Primary diagnosis
        Schizophrenia36 (44)
        Schizoaffective/bipolar28 (35)
        Substance use9 (11)
        Other psychotic4 (5)
        Other disorders4 (5)
    Gender
        Male69 (85)
        Female12 (15)
    Ethnicity
        African American19 (24)
        Caucasian51 (63)
        Hispanic8 (10)
        Other3 (4)
    Education level
        Less than high school26 (39)
        High school graduate17 (25)
        Greater than high school24 (36)
    Marital status
        Never married45 (56)
        Married7 (9)
        Widowed4 (5)
        Separated/divorced25 (31)
    Index offense
        Murder14 (17)
        Assault38 (47)
        Sex offense4 (5)
        Theft15 (18)
        Miscellaneous10 (12)
    Illness variables
        Psychiatric history (yes)55 (82)
        Age at onset22.3 (10.4)
        Number of admissions3.2 (1.9)
        Length of first admission5.1 (3.60)
        Total length of stay10.5 (7.0)
        Length of studied admission3.8 (2.4)
        Age at index offense34.4 (10.9)
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Differences in Unstandardized Scores on Release Decision Documentation and Admissions Between Decades

    Decade 1 (n = 19)Decade 2 (n = 35)Decade 3 (n = 26)Total (n = 80)p
    Indicators*
        Compliance0.32 (0.30)0.33 (0.27)0.63 (0.26)0.42 (0.30)<.01
        Aggression0.25 (0.24)0.20 (0.25)0.35 (0.23)0.26 (0.24)<.10
        Treatment response0.38 (0.18)0.40 (0.19)0.52 (0.20)0.43 (0.20)<.05
        Insight0.12 (0.23)0.20 (0.27)0.32 (0.32)0.22 (0.29)<.10
        Substance use0.08 (0.19)0.20 (0.24)0.37 (0.24)0.22 (0.25)<.01
        Formal risk0.00 (0.00)0.00 (0.00)0.10 (0.29)0.03 (0.17)<.05
    Admission details
        Number of admissions4.11 (2.47)2.83 (1.65)2.96 (1.75)3.16 (1.94)<.10
        Length of first admission7.07 (3.20)3.96 (3.25)5.39 (3.92)5.14 (3.65)<.01
        Total length of stay15.24 (8.46)9.25 (6.70)9.18 (5.01)10.59 (7.05)<.01
        Length of studied admission4.82 (2.25)2.95 (2.08)4.39 (2.63)3.86 (2.41)<.01
    • Data are expressed as the mean (SD).

    • * Range is 0 to 1, with 1 indicating all records contained documentation of all relevant indicators, 0 indicating no records contained documentation.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 36 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 36, Issue 3
September 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittees: Three Decades of Decision-Making
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittees: Three Decades of Decision-Making
Barbara E. McDermott, Charles L. Scott, David Busse, Felecia Andrade, Michelle Zozaya, Cameron D. Quanbeck
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 329-336;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Conditional Release of Insanity Acquittees: Three Decades of Decision-Making
Barbara E. McDermott, Charles L. Scott, David Busse, Felecia Andrade, Michelle Zozaya, Cameron D. Quanbeck
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 329-336;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law