Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

Making Consent More Informed: Preliminary Results From a Multiple-Choice Test Among Probation-Referred Marijuana Users Entering a Randomized Clinical Trial

Daniel B. Rounsaville, Karen Hunkele, Caroline J. Easton, Charla Nich and Kathleen M. Carroll
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2008, 36 (3) 354-359;
Daniel B. Rounsaville
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Hunkele
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caroline J. Easton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charla Nich
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen M. Carroll
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Informed-Consent Quiz: Item Response Frequencies

    Variablen%
    1. How many therapy sessions will you be asked to attend if you decide to participate?
        a. 4 Sessions21.5
        b. 0 Sessions0
        c. 8 Sessions*12797.7
        d. None of the above10.8
    2. Which of the following best describes the requirements for participation in the study?
        a. I can choose to participate in the study, and I can dropout at any time.*10681.5
        b. I can choose to participate but have to stay in the study.75.4
        c. I have to participate because of probation.86.2
        d. None of the above96.9
    3. Which of the following are treatment types that you may receive according to the luck of the draw?
        a. Drug counseling (standard treatment at the clinic)10.7
        b. Motivational interviewing0
        c. Drug counseling and rewards for attending sessions and providing marijuana-free urine samples3224.6
        d. Any of the above*9774.6
    4. Whom can you contact if you have any questions about the study?
        a. Kathleen Carroll, Ph.D.118.5
        b. Rajita Sinha, Ph.D.21.5
        c. Caroline Easton, Ph.D.64.6
        d. Any of the above*11185.4
    • n = 130, Range of weeks in treatment is 0 to 8. Range of quiz questions is 1 to 4.

    • * Correct response.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Relationships Between Informed-Consent Quiz Scores and Treatment Outcome Indicators

    VariableTotal Quiz ScoreVoluntary Nature of Participation Item
    Weeks in treatment0.060.01
    Days of marijuana use during treatment−0.19*−0.24*
    Percent marijuana positive urine specimens submitted−0.14−0.19*
    Longest continuous period of abstinence from marijuana, urine confirmed−0.22**−0.25**
    • n = 130, Range of weeks in treatment is 0 to 8. Range of quiz questions is 1 to 4.

    • * p <.05.

    • ** p <.01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 36 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 36, Issue 3
September 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Making Consent More Informed: Preliminary Results From a Multiple-Choice Test Among Probation-Referred Marijuana Users Entering a Randomized Clinical Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Making Consent More Informed: Preliminary Results From a Multiple-Choice Test Among Probation-Referred Marijuana Users Entering a Randomized Clinical Trial
Daniel B. Rounsaville, Karen Hunkele, Caroline J. Easton, Charla Nich, Kathleen M. Carroll
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 354-359;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Making Consent More Informed: Preliminary Results From a Multiple-Choice Test Among Probation-Referred Marijuana Users Entering a Randomized Clinical Trial
Daniel B. Rounsaville, Karen Hunkele, Caroline J. Easton, Charla Nich, Kathleen M. Carroll
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2008, 36 (3) 354-359;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law