Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Pro Se Competence in the Aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards

Douglas R. Morris and Richard L. Frierson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2008, 36 (4) 551-557;
Douglas R. Morris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard L. Frierson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 36 no. 4 551-557
PubMed 
19092075

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online December 17, 2008.

Copyright & Usage 
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Douglas R. Morris, MD and
  2. Richard L. Frierson, MD
  1. Dr. Morris is Volunteer Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. Dr. Frierson is Professor of Clinical Neuropsychiatry, Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship Director, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC
  1. Address correspondence to: Douglas R. Morris, MD, Logansport State Hospital, IRTC #832, 1098 South State Road 25, Logansport, IN 46947. E-mail: drdmo{at}hotmail.com

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 36 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 36, Issue 4
December 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pro Se Competence in the Aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pro Se Competence in the Aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards
Douglas R. Morris, Richard L. Frierson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2008, 36 (4) 551-557;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Pro Se Competence in the Aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards
Douglas R. Morris, Richard L. Frierson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2008, 36 (4) 551-557;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Indiana v. Edwards
    • Supreme Court Decision
    • Analysis
    • Research on Pro Se Defendants
    • Competency to Stand Trial Pro Se
    • Protection of Defendants’ Rights
    • Professional Guidelines
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law