Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

Expert Witness Confidence and Juror Personality: Their Impact on Credibility and Persuasion in the Courtroom

Robert J. Cramer, Stanley L. Brodsky and Jamie DeCoster
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2009, 37 (1) 63-74;
Robert J. Cramer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley L. Brodsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie DeCoster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  •   Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Manipulated confidence by perceived credibility.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Manipulated confidence by perceived credibility subscales.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Juror Personality and Expert Witness Credibility Analyses

    Dependent VariablePersonality Set (F(5,282) = )Significant Personality Domains t(282) = )
    Confidence1.28 (p = .27)
 (R2 change = .02)None
    Likability1.01 (p = .41)
 (R2 change = .02)Extroversion
 (2.06, p = .04)
    Trustworthiness2.65 (p = .02)
 (R2 change = .04)*Extroversion
 (3.21, p = .001)
    Knowledge1.44 (p = .21)
 (R2 change = .03)Extroversion
 (2.45, p = .02)
    Total credibility1.85 (p = .10)
 (R2 change = .03)†Extroversion
 (2.67, p = .008)
    Total credibility w/o confidence2.05 (p = .07)
 (R2 change = .04)†Extroversion
 (3.00, p = .003)
    • The set of control variables was not significant in all analyses. All effect size values represent the impact of set two (personality variables).

    • * Significant set.

    • † Significant trend.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 37 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 37, Issue 1
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expert Witness Confidence and Juror Personality: Their Impact on Credibility and Persuasion in the Courtroom
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expert Witness Confidence and Juror Personality: Their Impact on Credibility and Persuasion in the Courtroom
Robert J. Cramer, Stanley L. Brodsky, Jamie DeCoster
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2009, 37 (1) 63-74;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Expert Witness Confidence and Juror Personality: Their Impact on Credibility and Persuasion in the Courtroom
Robert J. Cramer, Stanley L. Brodsky, Jamie DeCoster
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2009, 37 (1) 63-74;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Expert Witness Credibility
    • Confidence: Definition and Associated Characteristics
    • Juror Personality Traits as Predictors of Decision-making
    • Expert Witness Testimony and Jury Sentencing
    • The Present Study
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Effects of Online Distance Learning on Violence Risk Knowledge and Competencies
  • Profiling Homicides Based on Impulsive or Proactive Natures in Male Schizophrenia Patients
  • Elder Financial Exploitation in the Digital Age
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2023 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law