Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherREGULAR ARTICLE

Forensic and Civil Psychiatric Inpatients: Development of the Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire

Andrew Shiva, Sara C. Haden and Jeannie Brooks
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2009, 37 (2) 201-213;
Andrew Shiva
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara C. Haden
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeannie Brooks
PsyD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Principal Component Analysis Factor Loadings and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Standardized Parameter Estimates of the Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire Items in Forensic and Civil Inpatient Samples

    ISQ ItemsPrincipal Components AnalysisConfirmatory Factor Analysis
    Forensic Inpatient Sample (n = 213) FactorsCivil Inpatient Sample (n = 208) FactorsForensic Inpatient Sample (n = 214) FactorsCivil Inpatient Sample (n = 208) Factors
    1234123123412
    1. The food is okay here.0.19−0.050.230.440.100.790.06
    2. I get enough to eat.+−0.030.820.020.41*
    3. I have enough chances to exercise.0.100.040.050.52+
    4. The public rooms (e.g., day room, dining room) and hallways are generally clean.−0.000.440.230.25+0.69*
    5. My room is okay.0.220.700.080.06+0.87*
    6. My bathroom is okay.0.180.850.080.01+0.73*
    7. The showers are okay.0.000.760.150.09+0.49*
    8. I have enough privacy when I need it.++
    9. It is quiet enough on the unit.++++
    10. I am comfortable here.+0.340.670.020.59*
    11. The staff is working to help me.+0.360.670.020.78*
    12. There is enough to do here during the day to keep me busy.+0.210.480.320.74*
    13. I feel safe here.++
    14. I am encouraged to talk with other patients++
    15. There is enough time to spend with friends and family when they visit me.++
    16. I have access to the telephone when I need it.0.070.110.050.830.18−0.000.870.67*
    17. The amount of time I can spend on the telephone is okay.−0.040.18−0.010.810.100.180.860.85*
    18. When I first got here, I was seen by the medical staff in a reasonable amount of time.0.190.080.740.17+0.48*
    19. The staff made an effort to explain to me why I was sent here.+0.530.270.14
    20. I understand (i.e., it has been explained) why I am taking medication.0.850.060.050.130.690.21−0.050.83*
    21. I feel that it is important for me to take medication.0.820.070.12−0.000.650.12−0.040.59*
    22. I am able to get medications in a reasonable amount of time when I need them.0.74−0.010.090.230.710.15−0.060.70*
    23. The side effects of my medication were explained to me.0.730.250.200.100.680.170.230.70*0.64*
    24. The doctors used medication too often to help patients calm down.++
    25. My treatment plan was discussed with me during my stay.0.550.170.25−0.03+++0.55*
    26. There should be more opportunities for therapy on the unit.++++
    27. I feel like I'm in danger here.++
    28. The rules of the prison/civil unit were explained to me when I got here.0.210.230.730.03+++0.73*
    29. My rights as a patient were explained to me when I got here.0.120.170.840.060.65−0.050.160.84*0.63*
    30. I feel bored during the day.++
    31. My medical (nonpsychiatric) needs were met during my stay on the unit.+++0.520.140.050.63*
    32. There are enough opportunities for therapy on the unit.+0.500.180.130.72*
    33. I received enough therapy while I was here.+0.580.170.230.61*
    34. This is a good place for me to discuss my problems.+0.580.240.120.60*
    35. The food is bad here.++
    36. Group therapy was helpful to me.++
    37. Medications were used by the doctors to help patients calm down only when it was necessary.+0.520.010.250.43*
    38. I have learned new things about myself while I was here.++
    39. I have emotional problems.++
    40. I wanted to receive more therapy while I was here.++++
    41. I am satisfied with my care here.++++
    • Bold indicates items loads on respective factor. +, item was dropped due to failing-item analysis; ++, item was dropped due to low loadings; +++, item was dropped due to double loadings.

    • * p <.01.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Forensic Inpatient Sample: F-ISQ Scale Descriptive Statistics From Principal Components and Confirmatory Factor Analyses Factor Structures

    ScaleRangeMean (SD)
    PCA (n = 213)
        Medication and treatment0–4.002.52 (.78)b
        Physical environment0.75–4.002.76 (0.57)a
        Unit rules and procedures0–4.002.52 (0.73)b
        Satisfaction with activities0.75–4.002.56 (0.65)b
    CFA (n = 214)
        Medication0–4.002.67 (0.77)b
        Physical environment1.00–4.002.89 (0.51)a
        Telephone access0–4.002.61 (0.84)b
        Unit rules and procedures0–4.002.51 (0.68)b
    • a,b Significant differences in paired sample t tests.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Forensic Sample: F-ISQ Principal Components Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Factor Intercorrelations

    12345678910
    Factor 11.000.18*0.100.39*0.67*0.45*0.32*0.34*0.27*0.32*
    Factor 20.30*1.000.35*0.34*0.71*0.35*0.45*0.38*0.49*0.32*
    Factor 30.40*0.39*1.000.29*0.53*0.48*0.60*0.52*0.51*0.53*
    Factor0.23*0.26*0.23*1.000.76*0.44*0.58*0.60*0.41*0.60*
    Total0.80*0.65*0.69*0.60*1.000.60*0.66*0.62*0.56*0.60*
    PCSQ total0.34*0.22*0.26*0.35*0.43*1.000.65*0.62*0.56*0.60*
    IESQ total0.26*0.28*0.33*0.24*0.39*0.66*1.000.98*0.90*0.92*
    IESQ-SPA0.27*0.25*0.33*0.23*0.38*0.64*0.97*1.000.82*0.88*
    IESQ-SE0.150.29*0.23*0.27*0.32*0.53*0.89*0.77*1.000.75*
    IESQ-ST0.26*0.24*0.30*0.20*0.36*0.65*0.91*0.83*0.76*1.00
    • PCA intercorrelations located on left side of 1.00 correlations, n = 213. CFA intercorrelations located on right side of 1.00 correlations, n = 214. PCSQ, Psychiatric Case Satisfaction Questionnaire; IESQ, Inpatient Evaluation of Service Questionnaire; SPA, staff-patient alliance; SE, satisfaction with environment; ST, satisfaction with treatment.

    • * p < .01.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Civil Inpatient Sample: C-ISQ Scale Descriptive Statistics from Principal Components and Confirmatory Factor Analyses Factor Structures

    ScaleRangeMean (SD)
    PCA (n = 208)
        Needs and opportunities0.36–4.002.63 (0.62)b
        Food and comfort0.25–4.002.63 (0.69)b
        Telephone access0.–4.002.79 (0.84)a
    CFA (n = 208)
        Needs and opportunities0.50–4.002.56 (0.61)
        Food and comfort0.75–4.002.55 (0.66)
    • a,b Significant differences in paired sample t test results.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Civil Sample: C-ISQ Principal Components Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Factor Intercorrelations

    123456789
    Factor 11.000.62*—0.96*0.51*0.61*0.52*0.53*
    Factor 20.45*1.00—0.82*0.53*0.61*0.58*0.62*0.50*
    Factor 30.31*0.22*1.00——————
    Total0.94*0.68*0.48*1.000.57*0.67*0.66*0.61*0.57*
    PCSQ total0.57*0.54*0.22*0.64*1.000.65*0.62*0.54*0.69*
    IESQ total0.60*0.54*0.34*0.67*0.71*1.000.98*0.91*0.93*
    IESQ-SPA0.58*0.51*0.35*0.65*0.69*0.98*1.000.82*0.87*
    IESQ-SE0.50*0.54*0.29*0.59*0.58*0.91*0.82*1.000.78*
    IESQ-ST0.57*0.47*0.26*0.61*0.76*0.92*0.88*0.76*1.00
    • PCA intercorrelations located on left side of 1.00 correlations, n = 208. CFA intercorrelations located on right side of 1.00 correlations, n = 208. —, no factor 3 for CFA, only factors 1 and 2 confirmed in civil sample. PCSQ, Psychiatric Case Satisfaction Questionnaire; IESQ, Inpatient Evaluation of Service Questionnaire; SPA, staff-patient alliance; SE, satisfaction with environment; ST, satisfaction with treatment.

    • * p < .01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 37 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 37, Issue 2
June 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Forensic and Civil Psychiatric Inpatients: Development of the Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Forensic and Civil Psychiatric Inpatients: Development of the Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Andrew Shiva, Sara C. Haden, Jeannie Brooks
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2009, 37 (2) 201-213;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Forensic and Civil Psychiatric Inpatients: Development of the Inpatient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Andrew Shiva, Sara C. Haden, Jeannie Brooks
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2009, 37 (2) 201-213;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Satisfaction Among Psychiatric Inpatients
    • Measures of Patient Satisfaction
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Study Limitations
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law