Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Whose DNA Is It Anyway? European Court, Junk DNA, and the Problem With Prediction

Sameer P. Sarkar and Gwen Adshead
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2010, 38 (2) 247-250;
Sameer P. Sarkar
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gwen Adshead
MB, BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 38 no. 2 247-250
PubMed 
20542946

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online June 11, 2010.

Copyright & Usage 
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Sameer P. Sarkar, MD and
  2. Gwen Adshead, MB, BS
  1. Dr. Sarkar is a Consultant Forensic and General Adult Psychiatrist in private practice in London, UK. Dr. Adshead is a Consultant in Forensic Psychotherapy, West London Mental Health Trust, Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berkshire, UK. The views expressed are based on publicly available information and the authors’ own experience and expertise in this field and do not rely on restricted information, which is only available to the NDNAD Ethics Group, or has been restricted in the interest of National Security. The views expressed are the authors’ and also do not represent those of West London Mental Health Trust
  1. Address correspondence to: Sameer P. Sarkar, MD, PO Box 3544, Wokingham, Berkshire, RG40 9FA, UK. E-mail: spsarkar{at}talktalk.net

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 38 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 38, Issue 2
June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Whose DNA Is It Anyway? European Court, Junk DNA, and the Problem With Prediction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Whose DNA Is It Anyway? European Court, Junk DNA, and the Problem With Prediction
Sameer P. Sarkar, Gwen Adshead
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2010, 38 (2) 247-250;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Whose DNA Is It Anyway? European Court, Junk DNA, and the Problem With Prediction
Sameer P. Sarkar, Gwen Adshead
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2010, 38 (2) 247-250;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DNA Profiling and Retention of Samples
    • New Developments in Genetic Identification Markers
    • Ancestral DNA, Ethnicity, and Function Creep
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law