Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
EditorialEDITORIAL

On Humanizing the Expert Witness: A Proposed Narrative Approach to Expert Witness Qualification

Michael Lamport Commons, Thomas Gordon Gutheil and James T. Hilliard
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2010, 38 (3) 302-304;
Michael Lamport Commons
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Gordon Gutheil
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James T. Hilliard
JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 38 no. 3 302-304
PubMed 
20852213

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online September 17, 2010.

Copyright & Usage 
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Michael Lamport Commons, PhD,
  2. Thomas Gordon Gutheil, MD and
  3. James T. Hilliard, JD
  1. Dr. Commons is Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Dr. Gutheil is Professor of Psychiatry and Co-founder, Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Mr. Hilliard is a partner in the law firm of Connor and Hilliard, Walpole, MA
  1. Address correspondence to: Thomas G. Gutheil, MD, 6 Wellman Street, Brookline, MA 02446. E-mail: gutheilg{at}cs.com

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 38 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 38, Issue 3
September 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
On Humanizing the Expert Witness: A Proposed Narrative Approach to Expert Witness Qualification
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
On Humanizing the Expert Witness: A Proposed Narrative Approach to Expert Witness Qualification
Michael Lamport Commons, Thomas Gordon Gutheil, James T. Hilliard
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2010, 38 (3) 302-304;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
On Humanizing the Expert Witness: A Proposed Narrative Approach to Expert Witness Qualification
Michael Lamport Commons, Thomas Gordon Gutheil, James T. Hilliard
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2010, 38 (3) 302-304;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Sample Narratives
    • Legal Support for The Narrative Approach
    • The Question of Relevance
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Challenges and Opportunities for Forensic Mental Health in Immigration Courts
  • State Hospital Rotations Allow Residents to Regain the Longitudinal Experiences of Yesteryear
  • Medical Misogyny and the Implications of Not Believing Women
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law