Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Book ReviewBOOK REVIEWS

Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook

Jennifer Piel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online February 2011, 39 (1) 134-135;
Jennifer Piel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

By Charles Patrick Ewing. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, John & Sons, Inc., 2008. 280 pp. $45.00 paperback.

Five of Waneta Hoyt's six children were presumed to have died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) when they were between 6 and 28 months old. This pattern was believed to be a medical anomaly until the early 1990s, when a New York State prosecutor came across a journal report, written 20 years prior, that described the deaths. When the prosecutor became convinced that Hoyt's children were killed by one of their relatives, he alerted law enforcement officials who invited Ms. Hoyt to participate in a research project on SIDS. During the interview with police officers, Ms. Hoyt admitted killing her five children; she later recanted her confession. Her attorney retained forensic psychologist Charles Patrick Ewing to ascertain whether Ms. Hoyt had waived her Miranda rights and whether her confession was voluntary.

The Hoyt case is one of 10 high-profile trials described in Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook. Ewing has been retained by prosecutors and defense attorneys to testify in more than 600 cases, but he testified as a defense expert in 9 of the 10 cases in this book. Professor Ewing teaches law at the State University of New York and has authored several books about forensic psychology, including expert witness testimony. He says that he wrote this book to share his experiences as an expert witness with students and colleagues.

Ewing includes an abundance of legal, psychological, and personal details about each case that make the book fascinating to read. The material is presented in a case-study format that includes the basic facts of the case; legal charges; prosecution and defense team strategies; matters pertaining to the mental health experts, including Ewing's role in the trial; and outcomes, including instances when the court found his testimony unpersuasive. One aspect of the book that may be appealing to forensic mental health practitioners is Ewing's critiques of how forensic evaluators are examined and cross-examined by attorneys. He bases his commentary on excerpts from trial transcripts. The cases selected by Ewing also illustrate important forensic concepts, including Miranda warnings and confessions, the insanity defense, amnesia and malingering, battered woman's syndrome, and child sexual-abuse allegations.

Mental health expert testimony, contends Ewing, can help attorneys explain the psychology of certain defendants. The author illustrates this concept in his discussion of the trial of Charline Brundidge who killed her chronically abusive husband while he was in bed and proffered a defense of battered woman's syndrome. Ewing says, “[T]he expert can explain to the jury, why, despite the fact that the batterer was not beating the woman at the moment of the killing the woman nevertheless feared that if she did not kill him, she would be killed or seriously injured” (pp 32–3). He also describes how the expert may be able to explain the reasonableness of the woman's fear.

The book's final chapter contains lessons Ewing has learned over three decades as an expert witness. Among other points, he says that, in many cases, expert witnesses have little influence on the jury. “My 30-plus years of forensic work, which includes the cases described in this book, has led me to suspect that often the influence of expert witnesses (myself included) is not as great as many people seem to think” (p 251). He reminds readers how difficult it can be for juries to appreciate the expert's testimony. The heinous facts of the case, he asserts, are often so “compellingly awful” that it is unlikely that any expert witness could sway a jury.

Overall, Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook presents forensic material in an educational and engaging manner. The book will be of interest to individuals wanting to learn more about forensic mental health testimony, including psychiatry residents and students of mental health law. The trials described by Ewing highlight forensic concepts in a way that will stay with readers. Experienced forensic mental health professionals will also enjoy the text, which offers a seasoned practitioner's perspectives on the role of an expert witness. Ewing is a gifted storyteller, whose clear writing style makes the book very readable.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 39 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 39, Issue 1
February 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook
Jennifer Piel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Feb 2011, 39 (1) 134-135;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Trials of a Forensic Psychologist: A Casebook
Jennifer Piel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Feb 2011, 39 (1) 134-135;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussion Syndrome: The New Evidence Base for Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Assessment of Malingered Neuropsychological Deficits
Show more BOOK REVIEWS

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law