Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleSpecial Article

Demographic, Criminogenic, and Psychiatric Factors That Predict Competency Restoration

Lori H. Colwell and Julie Gianesini
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2011, 39 (3) 297-306;
Lori H. Colwell
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Gianesini
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic Characteristics

    DemographicM (SD), n (%)
    Age at discharge, M (SD)37.9 (11.0)
    Ethnicity, n (%)
        Caucasian28 (39.4)
        African American34 (47.9)
        Hispanic/Latino3 (4.2)
        Asian2 (2.8)
        Arab/Middle Eastern1 (1.4)
        Other3 (4.2)
    Education, n (%)
        Less than high school26 (36.6)
        High school diploma/equivalent22 (31.0)
        Some college18 (25.4)
        College degree3 (4.2)
        Post-college education2 (2.8)
    • N = 71. Other ethnicities were Pakistani, Albanian, and Polish.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Legal and Psychiatric Histories

    CharacteristicM (SD), n (%)
    Prior involvement with legal system, n (%)
        Yes66 (93.0)
        No5 (7.0)
    Prior conviction for violence, n (%)
        Yes35 (51.5)
        No36 (48.5)
    Age at first arrest, M (SD)23.3 (9.7)
    Prior convictions, M (SD)4.9 (7.0)
    Prior incarcerations, M (SD)2.6 (3.7)
    Controlling offense, n (%)
        Felony54 (81.7)
        Misdemeanor13 (18.3)
    Maximum exposure, M (SD)38.9 (55.9)
    Prior mental health treatment, n (%)
        Yes62 (87.3)
        No9 (12.7)
    Prior hospitalizations, M (SD)4.0 (6.9)
    Prior episodes of incompetency, n (%)
        None46 (64.8)
        One14 (19.7)
        Two or more11 (15.5)
    • N = 71.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Current Psychiatric Characteristics

    CharacteristicM (SD), n (%)
    Primary Axis I diagnosis, n (%)
        Psychosis36 (53.7)
        Mood/anxiety11 (16.4)
        Substance abuse9 (13.4)
        Cognitive/other4 (5.6)
        No diagnosis7 (9.9)
    Primary Axis II diagnosis, n (%)
        Personality disorder21 (29.6)
        Borderline intellectual functioning8 (11.3)
        Mental retardation5 (7.0)
        Deferred16 (22.5)
        No diagnosis21 (29.6)
    Prescribed medications, n (%)
        Yes53 (74.6)
        No18 (25.4)
    Acceptance of medications, n (%)
        Accepted voluntarily32 (60.4)
        Initially resistant but ultimately accepted13 (24.5)
        Administered involuntarily or not at all8 (15.1)
    Seclusion/restraint, n (%)
        None61 (85.9)
        One7 (9.9)
        Two2 (2.8)
        Three1 (1.4)
    GAF at discharge, M (SD)44.3 (8.4)
    • N = 71.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Competent Versus Nonrestorable Defendants

    VariableCompetentNonrestorabletp
    Prior hospitalizations3.06 (3.67)7.12 (12.21)−2.09.04*
    Prior incarcerations2.16 (2.50)4.29 (6.09)−2.03.05*
    Prior incompetencies1.35 (0.66)1.94 (0.90)−2.90.01*
    IQ score87.96 (12.87)69.67 (13.12)3.62<.001*
    Medications prescribed1.91 (1.01)3.07 (0.88)−3.83<.001*
    Length of stay98.92 (54.54)173.18 (106.79)−3.70<.001*
    GAF at discharge47.39 (6.48)35.65 (8.08)6.03<.001*
    • * Significant at p < .05. Data are expressed as the mean (SD).

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Competent Versus Nonrestorable Defendants

    VariableCompetentNonrestorableχ2pp
    Psychosis13.46<.01*
        Yes21 (56.8)16 (43.2)
        No28 (96.6)1 (3.4)
    Borderline intellectual functioning14.75<.01*
        Yes2 (22.2)7 (77.8)
        No47 (82.5)10 (17.5)
    Mental deficiency8.32<.01*
        Yes1 (20.0)4 (80.0)
        No48 (78.8)13 (21.3)
    Personality disorder5.86.02*
        Yes18 (98.0)1 (5.3)
        No31 (66.0)16 (34.0)
    Prior incompetencies7.65.02*
        None37 (84.1)7 (15.9)
        Yes, 17 (63.6)4 (36.4)
        Yes, >15 (45.5)6 (54.5)
    • N = 49.

    • * Significant at p < .05. Data are the number of subjects (percentage of the entire group.)

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Hierarchical Logistic Regression Analysis for Demographic, Criminogenic, Historical Clinical, and Current Treatment Variables Predicting Restoration

    PredictorB (SE)WaldpOR (95% CI)
    Demographic
        Age at discharge0.12 (0.07)3.17.081.12 (0.99–1.28)
        Minority status0.74 (1.65)0.20.652.10 (0.08–53.24)
        Education−0.24 (0.87)0.08.780.79 (0.14–4.34)
    Criminogenic
        Prior incarcerations−0.22 (0.25)0.80.370.80 (0.49–1.31)
        Offense class−1.05 (0.68)2.36.120.35 (0.09–1.34)
        Maximum exposure−0.01 (0.04)0.08.780.99 (0.92–1.07)
    Historical clinical
        Primary Axis I−0.98 (0.94)1.10.290.37 (0.06–2.35)
        Primary Axis II−0.49 (0.66)0.54.460.61 (0.17–2.26)
        Prior hospitalizations0.28 (0.15)3.39.071.32 (0.98–1.77)
        Prior incompetency2.71 (1.27)4.55.0315.02 (1.25–181.20)*
        IQ class−2.16 (1.26)2.95.090.12 (0.01–1.36)
    Current treatment
        Days until medicated0.05 (0.02)4.80.031.05 (1.01–1.09)*
        Attendance2.94 (1.35)4.73.0318.81 (1.34–264.92)*
        Participation−1.77 (1.23)2.09.150.17 (0.02–1.88)
        Seclusion/restraint−0.91 (1.73)0.27.600.41 (0.01–12.02)
    R2 = 0.45*
    • Values listed are for final model (Block 4); OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; offense class, current controlling (most serious) offense.

    • * Significant at p < .05.

    • View popup
    Table 7

    Correlations Among Predictor Variables and Length of Stay

    AgePrisonClassMaxHospISTIQDaysAttendPartS/RObserveGAF
    LOS0.23−0.09−0.11−0.19−0.060.06−0.37*0.130.19−0.15−0.070.26*−0.39*
    • Age, age at discharge; Prison, number of prior incarcerations; Class, controlling offense class; Max, maximum exposure; Hosp, # of prior hospitalizations; IST, # of prior incompetencies; IQ, Full Scale IQ score; Days, days until medicated; Attend, group attendance; Part, group participation; S/R, episodes of seclusion/restraint; Observe, # of days on special observation; GAF, GAF at discharge

    • * Significant at p < .05.

    • View popup
    Table 8

    Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis for Demographic, Criminogenic, Historical Clinical, and Current Treatment Variables Predicting Length of Stay

    PredictorB (SE)βptPart r
    Demographic
        Age at discharge0.87 (3.34)0.15.810.260.07
        Minority status15.66 (50.04)0.11.770.310.08
        Education−1.77 (39.29)−0.03.97−0.05−0.01
    Criminogenic
        Prior incarcerations−20.06 (18.31)−1.61.32−1.10−0.29
        Offense class−25.04 (34.31)−0.49.50−0.73−0.19
        Maximum exposure0.76 (1.74)0.44.680.440.12
    Historical clinical
        Prior hospitalizations7.88 (6.95)1.28.311.130.30
        Prior incompetency66.90 (70.11)0.87.380.950.25
        IQ class45.36 (73.64)0.68.570.620.16
    Current treatment
        Days until medicated0.76 (0.54)0.60.221.240.37
        Attendance−9.03 (36.68)−0.09.82−0.25−0.06
        Participation7.36 (48.51)0.08.890.150.04
        Seclusion/restraint0.63 (78.50)0.01.990.01<0.01
    R2 = 0.66
    • Values listed are for final model (Block 4); offense class refers to current controlling (most serious) offense.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 39 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 39, Issue 3
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Demographic, Criminogenic, and Psychiatric Factors That Predict Competency Restoration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Demographic, Criminogenic, and Psychiatric Factors That Predict Competency Restoration
Lori H. Colwell, Julie Gianesini
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 297-306;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Demographic, Criminogenic, and Psychiatric Factors That Predict Competency Restoration
Lori H. Colwell, Julie Gianesini
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 297-306;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Competent Versus Incompetent Defendants
    • Restorable Versus Nonrestorable Defendants
    • Competency Restoration
    • The Present Study
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • AAPL Practice Guideline for Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Defendants Raising the Insanity Defense
  • Commentary: Building a Developmental-Ecological Model of Criminal Culpability During Adolescence
  • But He Knew It Was Wrong: Evaluating Adolescent Culpability
Show more SPECIAL ARTICLE

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law