Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

Ethics in Forensic Psychiatry Publishing

Reena Kapoor, John L. Young, Jacquelyn T. Coleman, Michael A. Norko and Ezra E. H. Griffith
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2011, 39 (3) 332-341;
Reena Kapoor
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John L. Young
MD, MTh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacquelyn T. Coleman
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Norko
MD, MAR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ezra E. H. Griffith
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Ethics Dilemmas in Psychiatric Publishing Identified by Walter et al.30,31

    Type of Ethics DilemmaExamples
    Redundant publicationIdentical (or near-identical) papers relating to antidepressant trials were published by the same research group in two different journals.
    Two papers by the same authors about neurotransmitter levels in schizophrenia appeared in different publications around the same time, with contradictory results.
    Publication of fraudulent researchA researcher who reported that tranquilizers were more harmful to children with mental retardation than stimulants was later found never to have conducted any studies.
    PlagiarismA graduate student plagiarized an entire paper on the differential diagnosis of dementia.
    A section of an article on insulin binding in anorexia nervosa was copied by a referee of the paper.
    An academic psychiatrist resigned after it was discovered that he had plagiarized large sections of articles that he had reviewed.
    An article reporting on a treatment for tics and ADHD was copied from an earlier article on another treatment for the same disorders.
    A paper on equine-facilitated psychotherapy for children was copied from a Master's thesis.
    AuthorshipAn author published an article on genetics of schizophrenia in “Nature” without naming some co-investigators as authors.
    Insensitive use of languageTerms such as “schizophrenogenic mother,” “refrigerator parent,” and “adolescent turmoil” may unintentionally cast blame or normalize abnormal behavior.
    Conflict of interestA study suggesting a link between autism and the MMR vaccine was published by a researcher who did not disclose that the study was funded by lawyers representing parents of children who had allegedly been harmed by vaccine.
    BiasAcademic rivalry and different conceptual approaches between authors, reviewers, and editors may lead to bias.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 39 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 39, Issue 3
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ethics in Forensic Psychiatry Publishing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ethics in Forensic Psychiatry Publishing
Reena Kapoor, John L. Young, Jacquelyn T. Coleman, Michael A. Norko, Ezra E. H. Griffith
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 332-341;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Ethics in Forensic Psychiatry Publishing
Reena Kapoor, John L. Young, Jacquelyn T. Coleman, Michael A. Norko, Ezra E. H. Griffith
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 332-341;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Method
    • Results and Analysis
    • Discussion and Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Benefits of Correctional Psychiatry Teaching and Clinical Exposure for Third-Year Medical Students
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law