Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Article CommentaryAnalysis and Commentary

Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence

Sarah L. Miller and Stanley L. Brodsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2011, 39 (3) 396-401;
Sarah L. Miller
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stanley L. Brodsky
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Influences on Violence Prediction: A Self-Assessment Guide

    Evaluator-Specific Influences
            Have I had any past adverse consequences from making inaccurate predictions?
            Have I ever had an evaluee commit suicide? Homicide?
            What are my attitudes on sentencing? Toward the criminal justice system?
            What is my level of confidence in conducting risk assessments?
            How strong is my need for approval? My need to be “right”?
            At any time, did I think what it would mean for me if I was wrong?
            Have colleagues or supervisors ever commented on personal attitudes that seem to affect my work?
    Case-Specific Influences
        Personal attitudes
            What biases do I have toward people who commit this crime? People who come from this background? This kind of victim?
            At any time, did I find myself feeling emotionally involved in this case? Feeling excessively emotionally detached?
            What kinds of reactions/feelings did I have toward the evaluee?
            Could the confirmation bias have been in play? Did I review my notes over the course of the case to combat this?
            Could I have fallen subject to illusory correlations between evaluee responses and risk?
        Ambiguity/uncertainty
            What would it mean for me if this person did poorly upon release? Was violent upon release? What would it mean for my employer?
            As I was interpreting the data, was there any time that I paused and was uncertain about making a decision or conclusion?
            Was I sufficiently concerned that I consulted with a colleague or shared information with a significant other? Should I have consulted?
            What was my gut instinct in this case? Did I follow it? Did I question it?
        Case limitations
            What are the limitations of my findings? Are they the standard limitations of risk evaluations or were there unique ones?
            What would a good lawyer ask me on cross examination? How would I answer?
        External forces
            Am I aware of any external pressures on the outcomes or conclusion of this case?
            How much has this case been in the media? How has it been portrayed?
    Context-Specific Influences
            Are there implicit norms where I work? Do they have a component of conservative prediction?
            Do co-workers talk in terms of consequences to themselves?
            Is there an institutional policy that outlines how to deal with ambiguity/uncertainty? That outlines my liability coverage?
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 39 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 39, Issue 3
1 Sep 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence
Sarah L. Miller, Stanley L. Brodsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 396-401;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Risky Business: Addressing the Consequences of Predicting Violence
Sarah L. Miller, Stanley L. Brodsky
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2011, 39 (3) 396-401;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Risks of Inaccuracy
    • Overprediction in Context
    • What Informs Our Work So Far?
    • Evaluator Self-Assessment
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law