Article Figures & Data
Tables
- Table 1
Univariate Analyses With Judges' Decisions as the Dependent Variable, Arranged Roughly From the Strongest Relation to the Weakest
Variable χ2 p φ Odds Ratio Likelihood of Transfer (%) Evaluator opinion 47.83 <.001 0.55 12.21 77 Amenability to treatment 39.59 <.001 0.53 12.54 72.4 Risk to public safety 27.20 <.001 −0.45 7.69 78.4 (low risk) DJS involvement, two groupings 26.27 <.001 −0.41 5.88 74.3 (no DJS involvement) History of offenses 23.41 <.001 −0.38 7.52 82.9 (no history) Emotional maturity 6.66 <.01 −0.34 4.18 67.6 (immature) Enrolled in school 11.04 <.001 0.26 2.94 63.6 Substance use 7.44 <.006 −0.22 2.54 57.9 (not using) Weapon 6.74 <.009 −0.21 3.85 75 Age at evaluation 4.52 <.05 0.17 1.97 58.5 (younger) Age at offense 3.88 <.050 0.16 1.87 57.8 (younger) Gender 3.98 <.050 −0.16 2.56 69.6 (female) DJS involvement, three groupings 29.64 <.001 NA NA NA Employment history 3.80 <.06 0.16 1.92 60.3 Children 3.66 <.06 −0.16 2.27 35.7 (with children) -
The original sample was 200. The number included in the analyses varied from 161 to 58 because various data were missing in the reviewed evaluations.
-
- Table 2
Univariate Analyses With Evaluators' Recommendations as the Dependent Variable, Arranged Roughly From the Strongest Relation to the Weakest
Variable χ2 p φ Odds Ratio Likelihood of Transfer (%) Amenability to treatment 94.19 <.001 0.82 141.56 89.7 Risk to public safety 58.23 <.001 −0.66 62.50 96.1 (low risk) Emotional maturity 30.14 <.001 −0.72 40.00 84.8 (immature) DJS involvement, three groupings 50.54 <.001 NA NA NA DJS involvement, two groupings 44.33 <.001 −0.54 13.16 87.1 (no history) History of offenses 24.61 <.001 −0.39 10.99 90.2 (no history) Enrolled in school 16.59 <.001 0.32 3.91 74 Age at offense 16.05 <.001 0.32 3.75 72.3 (younger) Substance use 8.93 <.003 −0.24 2.75 65.4 (younger) Weapon 7.54 <.006 −0.22 5.15 85 Age at evaluation 8.48 <.004 0.23 2.57 68.3 (younger) Children 6.15 <.02 −0.20 2.87 35.7 Race 5.49 <.02 −0.19 8.70 NA -
The original sample was 200. The number included in the analyses varied from 161 to 58 because various data were missing in the reviewed evaluations.
-