Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

Experience and Opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding PTSD in Criminal Cases

Ziv E. Cohen and Paul S. Appelbaum
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2016, 44 (1) 41-52;
Ziv E. Cohen
Dr. Cohen is Clinical Assistant Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY. Dr. Appelbaum is Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine, and the Law, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and Director, Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul S. Appelbaum
Dr. Cohen is Clinical Assistant Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY. Dr. Appelbaum is Elizabeth K. Dollard Professor of Psychiatry, Medicine, and the Law, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, and Director, Division of Law, Ethics, and Psychiatry, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of Respondent Forensic Psychiatrists

    Characteristic (number responding)Percentage of Group
    Years in practice (n = 172)
        <621 (36)
        6–1012 (21)
        11–2026 (45)
        >2039 (67)
        Fellow2 (3)
    Retaining party (n =176)
        Defense27 (47)
        Prosecution10 (17)
        Both equally44 (78)
        Does not perform criminal forensic evaluations19 (34)
    Retained in a criminal case involving PTSD (n =238)50 (120)
    Number of cases involving PTSD (n = 109)
        1–553 (58)
        6–1017 (18)
        >1030 (33)
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Reported Characteristics of Criminal Defendants in Respondents' Most Recent Cases Involving PTSD

    Combat ExposedNoncombat ExposedTotalCombat vs. Noncombat
    Case occurrences (years ago)(n = 38)(n = 64)(n = 109)χ2 4.53, df = 3, p = .210*
        <134 (13)42 (27)41 (45)
        1–455 (21)38 (24)41 (45)
        4–105 (2)16 (10)13 (14)
        >105 (2)5 (3)5 (5)
    Age(n = 35)(n = 59)(n = 100)χ2 = 0.832, df = 2, p = .660*
        18–3969 (24)61 (36)64 (64)
        40–6428 (10)37 (22)33 (33)
        >653 (1)2 (1)3 (3)
    Gender(n = 36)(n = 64)(n = 106)χ2 = 6.59, df = 1, p = .01†
        M97 (35)78 (50)85 (90)
        F3 (1)22 (14)15 (16)
    Race(n = 37)(n = 63)(n = 106)χ2 = 9.036, df = 1, p = .003†
        White83 (31)63 (40)71 (75)
        Black11 (4)27 (17)22 (23)
        Asian3 (1)5 (3)4 (4)
        Native American/Alaskan0 (0)3 (2)2 (2)
        Other3 (1)2 (1)1 (2)
    Hispanic(n = 33)(n = 65)(n = 107)χ2 = 4.19, df = 1, p = .041†
    6 (2)20 (13)14 (15)
    Armed services veteran(n = 37)(n = 64)(n = 103)χ2 = 54.47, df = 1, p < .0001†
    89 (33)14 (9)42 (43)
    Charges(n = 37)(n = 61)(n = 107)χ2 = 2.63, df = 2, p = .269*
        Homicide30 (11)42 (26)40 (43)
        Other violent59 (22)42 (26)46 (49)
        Nonviolent11 (4)16 (9)14 (15)
    Previous legal claims based on PTSD(n = 37)(n = 64)(n = 107)χ2 = 4.11, df = 1, p = .043†
        Yes35 (13)11 (7)19 (20)
        No54 (20)70 (45)66 (71)
        Don't know11 (4)19 (12)15 (16)
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • ↵* Log-linear regression.

    • ↵† Pearson's goodness of fit.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Etiology of Reported Trauma and Assessment Methods

    Combat ExposedNoncombat ExposedTotalCombat vs. Noncombat
    Nature of trauma(n = 38)(n = 62)(n = 104)χ2 = 132.81, df = 4, p = <.0001*
        Combat100 (38)037 (38)
        Accident08 (5)5 (5)
        Violence victim037 (23)25 (26)
        Witness023 (14)14 (15)
        Sexual/physical abuse032 (20)19 (20)
    Physically injured by trauma†(n = 36)(n = 43)(n = 79)χ2 = 2.1, df = 1, p = .149
        Yes22 (8)34 (16)30 (24)
        No78 (28)66 (27)70 (55)
    TBI Sustained(n = 36)(n = 43)(n = 79)χ2 = 8.5, df = 1, p = .0036‡
        Yes17 (6)9 (4)13 (10)
        No83 (30)82 (35)82 (65)
        Don't know09 (4)5 (4)
    Assessment of reliability(n = 38)(n = 58)(n = 98)χ2 = 6.07, df = 2, p = .048*
        Accurate reporter76 (29)52 (30)60 (59)
        Exaggerating13 (5)26 (15)22 (21)
        Malingering11 (4)22 (13)18 (18)
    Structured assessment of PTSD used§(n = 38)(n = 58)(n = 100)χ2 = .159, df = 1, p = .69
    16 (6)19 (11)18 (18)
    Persons interviewed‖(n = 36)(n = 58)(n = 94)
        Family members44 (16)36 (21)39 (37)χ2 = .632, df = 1, p = .427
        Spouse/partner22 (8)16 (9)18 (17)χ2 = .674, df = 1, p = .412
        Friends19 (7)9 (5)13 (12)χ2 = 2.34, df = 1, p = .126
        Witnesses of trauma6 (2)16 (9)12 (11)χ2 = 2.13, df = 1, p = .144
        Other¶33 (12)19 (11)24 (23)χ2 = 2.48, df = 1, p = .115
        None42 (15)57 (33)53 (50)χ2 = 2.06, df = 1, p = .151
    Documents reviewed‖(n = 36)(n = 58)(n = 94)
        Health records81 (29)88 (51)85 (80)χ2 = 0.953, df = 1, p = .329
        Criminal records50 (18)62 (36)61 (57)χ2 = 1.32, df = 1, p = .250
        Military records67 (24)9 (5)31 (29)χ2 = 35.1, df = 1, p < .0001
        Employment records28 (10)28 (16)30 (28)χ2 = .0004, df = 1, p = .984
        Other#67 (24)64 (37)65 (61)χ2 = .081, df = 1, p = .777
        None8 (3)2 (1)4 (4)χ2 = 2.38, df = 1, p = .155**
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • ↵* Log-linear regression.

    • ↵† Does not include TBI.

    • ↵‡ Chi square test, excluding “don't know” responses.

    • ↵§ SCID, CAPS, and PTSD checklist.

    • ↵‖ Respondents instructed to choose as many categories as applicable.

    • ↵¶ Employer or coworkers, other military personnel, schoolmates, law enforcement, Catholic Archdiocese, prior psychiatric/medical providers, crime witnesses (some categories provided by respondents).

    • ↵# Past litigation records, photographs, school records, workers compensation records, child protective services records, police reports, social security reports, defendant personal writings, jail records, police interrogation videos (some categories provided by respondents).

    • ↵** Fisher's exact test.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Respondents' Findings on Forensic Assessment

    Combat ExposedNon-Combat ExposedTotalCombat vs. Non-Combat
    In mental health treatment at time of alleged offense(n = 37)(n = 63)(n = 103)
        Yes35 (13)14 (9)21 (22)χ2 = 5.088, df = 1, p = .024*
        Treated with medication†35 (13)14 (9)20 (21)χ2 = 5.08, df = 1, p = .024
        Treated with psychotherapy†16 (6)3 (2)8 (8)χ2 = 4.90, df = 1, p = .0270
        No65 (24)79 (50)74 (76)
        Don't know0 (0)6 (4)5 (5)χ2 = 2.45, df = 1, p = .118
    Intoxicated at time of alleged offense(n = 37)(n = 63)(n = 106)
        Yes‡43 (16)38 (24)39 (41)χ2 = .266, df = 1, p = .606
        No46 (17)51 (32)50 (53)
        Don't know11 (4)11 (7)11 (12)χ2 = .002, df = 1, p = .963
    (n = 38)(n = 60)(n = 100)
    PTSD Diagnosis§68 (26)57 (34)61 (61)χ2 = .941, df = 1, p = .332
    Subthreshold PTSD Diagnosis5 (2)8 (5)7 (7)χ2 = .381, df = 1, p = .565
    Other diagnosis‖(n = 38)(n = 64)(n = 104)
        Substance abuse47 (18)31 (20)37 (38)χ2 = 2.65, df = 1, p = .104
        MDD21 (8)17 (11)19 (20)χ2 = .240, df = 1, p = .628
        Psychotic disorder11 (4)3 (2)6 (6)χ2 = 2.40, df = 1, p = .125
        Other¶47 (18)42 (27)43 (45)χ2 = .260, df = 1, p = .610
        None24 (9)14 (9)19 (20)χ2 = .192, df = 1, p = .661
        Don't know8 (3)16 (10)13 (14)χ2 = 1.28, df = 1, p = .258
    Personality disorder(n = 36)(n = 63)(n = 102)
        Yes17 (6)25 (16)23 (23)χ2 = 2.372, df = 1, p = .124
        No61 (22)40 (25)48 (49)
        Don't know22 (8)35 (22)29 (30)χ2 = 1.75, df = 1, p = .186
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • ↵* Chi square test performed on “yes” vs. “no” responses; “don't know” responses were excluded.

    • ↵† Respondents instructed to answer as many as applied.

    • ↵‡ Combat exposed: alcohol 38% (14), crystal meth 5% (2). Noncombat exposed: 29% (18), crack cocaine 13% (8). Total: alcohol 30% (32), crack cocaine 8% (8).

    • ↵§ According to DSM-IV-TR PTSD criteria.

    • ↵‖ Respondents instructed to choose as many diagnoses as applied.

    • ↵¶ Other anxiety disorder, dissociative disorder, bipolar affective disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, pedophilia, intermittent explosive disorder, dysthymic disorder, Tourette's disorder, adjustment disorder, cognitive disorder.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Legal Variables in Respondents' Most Recent Criminal Forensic Case Involving PTSD

    Combat ExposedNoncombat ExposedTotalCombat vs. Noncombat
    Retaining agent(n = 38)(n = 63)(n = 107)χ2 = 1.179, df = 2, p = .56*
        Defense50 (19)53 (34)53 (57)
        Court40 (15)30 (19)33 (35)
        Prosecution11 (4)16 (10)14 (15)
    Defense claim†(n = 35)(n = 59)(n = 97)
        Not guilty by reason of insanity49 (17)25 (15)34 (33)χ2 = 5.24, df = 1, p = .022
        Diminished responsibility37 (13)44 (26)41 (40)χ2 = .434, df = 1, p = .510
    Other legal claims†(n = 28)(n = 48)(n = 79)
        Mitigation86 (24)77 (37)80 (63)χ2 = .832, df = 1, p = .362
        Incompetent to stand trial4 (1)16 (8)11 (9)χ2 = 2.90 df = 1, p = .0883
        Other‡18 (5)15 (7)18 (14)χ2 = .143, df = 1, p = .706
    Stages psychiatric evidence introduced†(n = 37)(n = 62)(n = 107)
        Pretrial68 (25)66 (41)67 (72)χ2 = .022, df = 1, p = .883
        Trial41 (15)36 (22)37 (40)χ2 = .253, df = 1, p = .615
        Sentencing30 (11)40 (25)36 (38)χ2 = .608, df = 1, p = .436
    Expert's opinion on legal claim(n = 37)(n = 58)(n = 98)
        Valid60 (22)47 (27)50 (49)χ2 = 1.510, df = 1, p = .220
        Invalid40 (15)53 (31)50 (49)
    Opposing expert retained(n = 37)(n = 60)(n = 101)
        Yes24 (9)38 (23)34 (34)χ2 = 2.03, df = 1, p = .154
        No35 (13)25 (15)29 (29)
        Don't know22 (8)23 (14)23 (23)χ2 = .0382, df = 1, p = .845
        Not applicable19 (7)13 (8)15 (15)χ2 = .546, df = 1, p = .460
    Agreement between opposing experts(n = 9)(n = 23)(n = 34)
        PTSD present
            Yes89 (8)26 (6)41 (14)χ2 = 6.801, df = 1, p = .014§
            No11 (1)48 (11)41 (14)
            Don't know0 (0)26 (6)18 (6)χ2 = 2.89, df = 1, p = .0891
        Legal claim
            Yes56 (5)35 (8)41 (14)χ2 = 1.16, df = 1, p = .282
            No33 (3)39 (9)38 (13)
            Don't know11 (1)26 (6)21 (7)χ2 = .849, df = 1, p = .357
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • ↵* Log-linear regression.

    • ↵† Respondents instructed to select as many as applied.

    • ↵‡ Plea-bargaining and charges dropped.

    • ↵§ Fisher's exact test.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Legal Outcomes Reported by Respondents Regarding the Most Recent Criminal Case Involving PTSD as a Legal Claim

    Combat Exposed % (n)Noncombat Exposed % (n)Total % (n)Combat vs. Noncombat
    Went to trial(n = 37)(n = 64)(n = 108)
        Yes32 (12)41 (26)39 (42)χ2 = .400, df = 1, p = .527
        No41 (15)38 (24)37 (40)
        Unknown27 (10)22 (14)24 (26)χ2 = .344, df = 1, p = .558
    Type of trial(n = 12)(n = 26)(n = 41)
        Judge17 (2)39 (10)29 (12)χ2 = 2.25, df = 1, p = .134
        Jury83 (10)53 (14)66 (27)
        Don't know0 (0)8 (2)5 (2)χ2 = .974, df = 1, p = .324
    Outcome*(n = 36)(n = 56)(n = 95)
        NGRI11 (4)5 (3)7 (7)χ2 = 1.02, df = 1, p = .313
        Lesser charge19 (7)27 (15)23 (22)χ2 = .775, df = 1, p = .379
        Guilty38 (14)39 (22)40 (38)χ2 = .009, df = 1, p = .924
        GBMI3 (1)01 (1)χ2 = 1.56, df = 1, p = .212
        Charges dismissed8 (3)4 (2)5 (5)χ2 = .952, df = 1, p = .329
        Innocence0 (0)2 (1)1 (1)χ2 = .660, df = 1, p = .416
        Don't know21 (8)23 (13)23 (22)χ2 = .012, df = 1, p = .912
    Mitigation(n = 36)(n = 55)(n = 94)
        Yes39 (14)25 (14)30 (28)χ2 = 3.05, df = 1, p = .081
        No14 (5)27 (15)22 (21)
        Don't know33 (12)36 (20)35 (33)χ2 = .035, df = 1, p = .851
        Not applicable†14 (5)11 (6)13 (12)
    • Data are expressed as the percentage of the group of respondents (n).

    • ↵* Respondents instructed to choose as many as applied.

    • ↵† Defendant found innocent, NGRI, or charges dismissed.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 44 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 44, Issue 1
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experience and Opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding PTSD in Criminal Cases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Experience and Opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding PTSD in Criminal Cases
Ziv E. Cohen, Paul S. Appelbaum
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2016, 44 (1) 41-52;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Experience and Opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding PTSD in Criminal Cases
Ziv E. Cohen, Paul S. Appelbaum
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2016, 44 (1) 41-52;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Attitudes of Forensic Fellowship Psychiatry Directors towards an Applicant Match
  • Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States
  • Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law