Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

MMPI-2 Item Endorsements in Dissociative Identity Disorder vs. Simulators

Bethany L. Brand, Gregory S. Chasson, Cori A. Palermo, Frank M. Donato, Kyle P. Rhodes and Emily F. Voorhees
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2016, 44 (1) 63-72;
Bethany L. Brand
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory S. Chasson
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cori A. Palermo
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank M. Donato
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle P. Rhodes
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily F. Voorhees
Dr. Brand is Professor of Psychology, Dr. Chasson is Assistant Professor, Clinical Psychology, Ms. Palermo is a Graduate Research Assistant, Mr. Donato is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Mr Rhodes is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, and Ms. Voorhees is an Undergraduate Research Assistant, Department of Psychology, Towson University, Towson, MD. MMPI-2 items were used with permission from the University of Minnesota Press and have been abbreviated to prevent copyright infringement. Please refer to item numbers while using this article in clinical practice.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Group Differences on the F Scale

    ItemItem ThemeDID Group Endorsement DirectionDID Group Endorsement (%)Coached Group Endorsement (%)Uncoached Group Endorsement (%)DID vs. CDID vs. UNC vs. UN
    χ2ORχ2ORχ2OR
    12Sexual difficultyMost9076.659.73.6613.23*6.084.78
    24DelusionsLeast5.727.332.89.74*6.2513.25*8.150.53
    66Lack of regard for laws/enforcementLeast1.928.949.315.61*21.1932.70*50.476.20*0.42
    126Rejection of laws/enforcementLeast3.816.953.75.2934.13*0.0321.67*5.72
    138Delusions of persecutionLeast7.539.053.716.04*7.8228.40*14.233.15
    144Delusions of persecutionLeast7.737.749.314.64*7.2523.60*11.651.96
    150Self-destructivenessMost75.572.750.70.127.65*0.347.39*2.59
    162Delusions of persecutionLeast1.929.941.816.33*22.1525.71*37.332.23
    168DissociationMost84.990.968.71.114.2611.33*4.57
    180Awareness of psychological problemsMost77.480.559.70.194.217.52*2.79
    216Delusions of persecutionLeast5.729.952.211.50*7.1029.67*18.237.45*0.39
    228Delusions of persecutionLeast7.537.764.215.03*7.4039.83*21.9510.08*0.34
    252Sensory dullingLeast7.535.141.813.09*6.6217.75*8.800.69
    270Sadism towards animalsLeast7.519.538.83.5815.42*7.776.57*0.38
    • DID group (n = 53); coached group (C; n = 77); uncoached group (UN; n = 67). Least indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 least endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale. Most indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 most endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale.

    • ↵* p < .015 (α was adjusted by using false-discovery rate procedure).

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Group Differences on the FB Scale

    ItemItem ThemeDID Group Endorsement DirectionDID Group Endorsement (%)Coached Group Endorsement (%)Uncoached Group Endorsement (%)DID vs. CDID vs. UNC vs. UN
    χ2ORχ2ORχ2OR
    311DissociationMost62.383.165.27.21*2.980.116.09*2.63
    323Sadistic towards loved onesLeast1.929.947.016.33*22.1530.39*46.064.42
    383Lack of family supportMost59.684.252.29.76*0.280.6517.09*0.21
    387Possible alcohol abuseLeast7.538.243.915.37*7.5619.43*9.600.49
    395Pervasive fearMost41.568.473.19.25*3.0512.25*3.840.38
    463Pervasive fearMost49.184.263.118.29*5.542.348.23*3.12
    478Hatred of familyLeast9.440.340.914.90*6.4714.81*6.650.01
    489Substance abuseLeast5.735.539.415.61*9.1818.15*10.830.23
    501Viewing others as unable to helpLeast5.753.951.532.39*0.05128.85*0.060.08
    506Suicidal ideationMost81.179.260.60.075.875.94
    516DepressionMost47.275.354.510.78*3.420.646.81*2.54
    525Possible depressionMost62.384.462.78.30*3.280.0028.86*3.22
    528Lack of self-blame for problemsLeast7.742.957.618.76*9.0031.57*16.293.08
    540Substance abuseLeast9.455.849.329.03*12.1421.68*9.320.62
    • DID group (n = 53); coached group (C; n = 77); uncoached group (UN; n = 67). Least indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 least endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale. Most indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 most endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale.

    • ↵* p < .015 (α was adjusted using false discovery rate procedure).

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Group Differences on the Fp Scale

    ItemItem ThemeDID Group Endorsement DirectionDID Group Endorsement (%)Coached Group Endorsement (%)Uncoached Group Endorsement (%)DID vs. CDID vs. UNC vs. UN
    χ2ORχ2ORχ2OR
    51Unwilling to admit to normal flawsLeastDID: 3.8C: 19.5UN: 43.36.81*0.1624.11*0.059.57*3.15
    66Lack of regard for laws/enforcementLeastDID: 1.9C: 28.9UN: 49.315.61*21.1932.70*50.476.20*0.42
    93Unwilling to admit to normal flawsLeastDID: 1.9C: 13.0UN: 25.44.9912.80*0.063.61
    114Antisocial urgesLeastDID: 9.4C: 41.6UN: 50.715.91*6.8323.02*9.891.22
    126Rejection of laws/enforcementLeastDID: 3.8C: 16.9UN: 53.75.2934.13*0.0321.67*5.72
    162Delusions of persecutionLeastDID: 1.9C: 29.9UN: 41.816.33*22.1525.71*37.332.23
    193Magical thinking and behaviorLeastDID: 9.4C: 41.6UN: 58.215.91*6.8330.32*13.373.97
    216Delusions of persecutionLeastDID: 5.7C: 29.9UN: 52.211.50*7.1029.67*18.237.45*0.39
    228Delusions of persecutionLeastDID: 7.5C: 37.7UN: 64.215.03*7.4039.83*21.9510.08*0.34
    270Sadism towards animalsLeastDID: 7.5C: 19.5UN: 38.83.5815.42*7.776.57*0.38
    282Sleep abnormalitiesMostDID: 22.6C: 75.3UN: 64.235.06*10.4320.57*6.122.13
    291Lack of romantic loveMostDID: 18.9C: 57.1UN: 41.818.94*5.737.19*3.093.38
    294Physiological activationMostDID: 13.2C: 32.5UN: 47.86.28*3.1616.11*6.013.50
    322Fear of dangerous objectsMostDID: 30.2C: 61.0UN: 40.911.96*3.621.465.80
    323Sadistic towards loved onesLeastDID: 1.9C: 29.9UN: 47.016.33*22.1530.39*46.064.42
    336Mind controlMostDID: 13.7C: 42.1UN: 64.611.55*4.5730.33*11.487.12*0.40
    387Possible alcohol abuseLeastDID: 7.5C: 38.2UN: 43.915.37*7.5619.43*9.600.49
    478Hatred of familyLeastDID: 9.4C: 40.3UN: 40.914.90*6.4714.81*6.650.01
    501Viewing others as unable to helpLeastDID: 5.7C: 53.9UN: 51.532.39*0.05128.85*0.060.08
    555Fearful at homeMostDID: 20.8C: 70.1UN: 57.630.61*8.9616.45*5.182.44
    • DID group (n = 53); coached group (C; n = 77); uncoached group (UN; n = 67). Least indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 least endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale. Most indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 most endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale.

    • ↵* p < .015 (α was adjusted using false discovery rate procedure).

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Group Differences on the Sc Scale

    ItemItem ThemeDID Group Endorsement DirectionDID Group Endorsement (%)Coached Group Endorsement (%)Uncoached Group Endorsement (%)DID vs. CDID vs. UNC vs. UN
    χ2ORχ2ORχ2OR
    12Sexual difficultyMostDID: 90.0C: 76.6UN: 59.73.6613.23*6.084.78
    138Delusions of persecutionLeastDID: 7.5C: 39.0UN: 53.716.04*7.8228.40*14.233.15
    165Poor memoryMostDID: 83.0C: 79.2UN: 55.20.2910.42*3.969.49*0.32
    168DissociationMostDID: 84.9C: 90.0UN: 68.71.114.2611.33*4.57
    180Awareness of psychological problemsMostDID: 77.4C: 80.5UN: 59.70.194.217.52*2.79
    210Dislikes travelLeastDID: 18.9C: 44.2UN: 43.98.97*0.298.39*0.300.001
    229DissociationMostDID: 83.0C: 93.5UN: 71.63.592.1412.33*5.70
    252Sensory dullingLeastDID: 7.5C: 35.1UN: 41.813.09*6.6217.75*8.800.69
    277LonelinessMostDID: 75.5C: 83.1UN: 61.21.152.758.72*3.12
    290Does not worry about careerLeastDID: 17.0C: 37.7UN: 41.86.49*0.348.54*0.290.26
    291Lack of romantic loveLeastDID: 18.9C: 57.1UN: 41.818.94*5.737.19*3.093.38
    292Family traumaMostDID: 84.9C: 83.1UN: 58.20.0710.04*0.2510.91*3.54
    323Sadistic towards loved onesLeastDID: 1.9C: 29.9UN: 47.016.33*22.1530.39*46.064.42
    332MasochismLeastDID: 11.3C: 27.3UN: 46.24.8516.71*6.715.46
    • DID group (n = 53); coached group (C; n = 77); uncoached group (UN; n = 67). Least indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 least endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale. Most indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 most endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale.

    • ↵* p < .015 (α was adjusted using false discovery rate procedure).

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Group Differences on the D Scale

    Item #Item ThemeDID Group Endorsement DirectionDID Group Endorsement (%)Coached Group Endorsement (%)Uncoached Group Endorsement (%)DID vs. CDID vs. UNC vs. UN
    χ2ORχ2ORχ2OR
    10Difficulty functioning at workMostDID: 79.2%C: 59.7%UN: 49.3%5.4611.36*3.931.59
    56Less happy than othersMostDID: 96.2%C: 89.6%UN:76.1%1.949.38*0.134.70
    68Not sadistic towards animalsMostDID: 84.9%C: 71.4%UN: 55.2%3.2112.05*4.564.08
    73Low self-confidenceMostDID: 90.6%C: 88.2%UN: 68.7%0.198.37*0.238.17*3.40
    127Vulnerable to criticismMostDID: 90.6%C: 68.8%UN: 73.1%8.56*0.235.800.32
    142Neurological conversion symptomsLeastDID: 23.1%C: 61.0%UN: 65.7%18.02*0.1921.32*0.160.33
    143Weight changesMostDID: 78.8%C: 51.9%UN: 49.3%9.61*3.4510.90*3.840.10
    165Poor memoryMostDID: 83.0%C: 79.2%UN: 55.2%0.2910.42*3.969.49*0.32
    223More anxious than othersMostDID: 79.2%C: 63.6%UN: 49.3%3.6411.36*3.933.02
    248Blame people who take advantage of othersMostDID: 90.6%C: 63.6%UN: 43.9%12.02*5.4927.98*12.255.56
    260Not humored by sexual jokesLeastDID: 17.0%C: 40.3%UN: 23.9%7.99*0.300.854.37
    • DID group (n = 53); coached group (C; n = 77); uncoached group (UN; n = 67). Least indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 least endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale. Most indicates that the item was 1 of the top 10 most endorsed items by the DID group in that particular scale.

    • ↵* p < .015 (α was adjusted using false discovery rate procedure).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 44 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 44, Issue 1
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MMPI-2 Item Endorsements in Dissociative Identity Disorder vs. Simulators
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MMPI-2 Item Endorsements in Dissociative Identity Disorder vs. Simulators
Bethany L. Brand, Gregory S. Chasson, Cori A. Palermo, Frank M. Donato, Kyle P. Rhodes, Emily F. Voorhees
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2016, 44 (1) 63-72;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
MMPI-2 Item Endorsements in Dissociative Identity Disorder vs. Simulators
Bethany L. Brand, Gregory S. Chasson, Cori A. Palermo, Frank M. Donato, Kyle P. Rhodes, Emily F. Voorhees
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2016, 44 (1) 63-72;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Materials
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Legal and Ethics Considerations in Capacity Evaluation for Medical Aid in Dying
  • Mental Health Aftercare Availability for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth in New York City
  • Attitudes of Forensic Fellowship Psychiatry Directors towards an Applicant Match
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law