Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice

Emily Haney-Caron, Leah Brogan, Amanda NeMoyer, Sharon Kelley and Kirk Heilbrun
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2016, 44 (4) 457-469;
Emily Haney-Caron
Ms. Haney-Caron, Ms. Brogan, and Ms. NeMoyer are Doctoral Candidates and Dr. Heilbrun is Professor, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Kelley is a Research Associate in Law and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
MS, JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leah Brogan
Ms. Haney-Caron, Ms. Brogan, and Ms. NeMoyer are Doctoral Candidates and Dr. Heilbrun is Professor, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Kelley is a Research Associate in Law and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda NeMoyer
Ms. Haney-Caron, Ms. Brogan, and Ms. NeMoyer are Doctoral Candidates and Dr. Heilbrun is Professor, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Kelley is a Research Associate in Law and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
MS, JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon Kelley
Ms. Haney-Caron, Ms. Brogan, and Ms. NeMoyer are Doctoral Candidates and Dr. Heilbrun is Professor, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Kelley is a Research Associate in Law and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
JD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirk Heilbrun
Ms. Haney-Caron, Ms. Brogan, and Ms. NeMoyer are Doctoral Candidates and Dr. Heilbrun is Professor, Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Kelley is a Research Associate in Law and Forensic Psychology, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Changes in DSM-5 Relevant to Juvenile Justice Populations

    DiagnosisDSM-IV-TR CriteriaDSM-5 CriteriaPotential Impact
    Internalizing disorders
        Bipolar disorder I/IIManic episode described as period of “abnormally and persistently elevated, expansive, or irritable mood”Manic episode described using abnormalities in mood and goal-directed activity or energyYouths exhibiting elevated or irritable mood alone (i.e., without increased energy) may be less likely to receive a bipolar disorder diagnosis
    No indication of behavior representing a distinct change.Manic behavior must “represent a noticeable change from usual behavior.”May result in fewer bipolar diagnoses among youths with comorbid diagnoses resulting in high energy and irritable mood
        Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD)N/A (new diagnosis in DSM-5)Characterized by recurring severe temper outbursts and persistently irritable mood between outbursts; excludes coexisting ODD, IED, or bipolar disorderMay result in fewer bipolar disorder diagnoses and therefore reduce use of atypical antipsychotic medications in this population
        Major depressive disorder (MDD)Depressed mood described as feeling sad or emptyDepressed mood described as feeling “sad, empty, or hopeless”May increase MDD diagnosis among youths who suppress the appearance of sadness to better survive in hostile environments
    N/AAdded new specifier: “with anxious distress”May increase attention to anxiety symptoms in youths with MDD, which has been linked to increased suicide risk
    N/AAdded new specifier: “with peripartum onset”May be particularly relevant for diagnosing depression in female justice-involved youths, a growing group in the juvenile justice system
        Persistent depressive disorder (PDD)N/A (new diagnosis in DSM-5)Consolidates dysthymic disorder and chronic MDD from DSM-IV; MDEs can be noted via specifierOverlapping criteria for MDD and PDD may complicate diagnostic picture for youths who lack insight into how long they have experienced these symptoms
        Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)Classified as an anxiety disorderClassified as a trauma- and stressor-related disorderAppears to emphasize the unique characteristics of trauma-related disorders
    Traumatic event must be accompanied by reactions of intense fear, helplessness, or horrorThis requirement has been removed in DSM-5May promote PTSD diagnosis among youths who demonstrate varied immediate reactions to trauma, especially those with repeated exposure
    Included three symptom clusters: re-experiencing, avoidance/numbing, arousalSeparated avoidance and numbing clusters; added persistent negative emotional statesMay better contextualize apparent externalizing behaviors (e.g., substance use) that often arise after exposure to trauma
    Arousal symptom cluster did not include “reckless or self-destructive behavior”DSM-5 has added “reckless or self-destructive behavior” to arousal and reactivity cluster
        Separation anxiety disorderOnset before age 18Onset can be after 18May improve diagnostic accuracy for young adults (18–21) under juvenile court supervision for delinquent acts they committed before age 18
        Somatic symptom disorder (SSD)Somatization disorder; hypochondriasis; pain disorderNo longer requires a specific number of complaints; somatic symptoms no longer must be medically unexplainedMay increase the number of SSD diagnoses among justice-involved youths
    Externalizing disorders
        Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)Onset before 7 years of ageOnset before 12 years of ageGiven potentially confounding influence of other major life events (i.e., puberty, transition to secondary school) occurring around the same stage in development, may promote false positive diagnoses among justice-involved youths
    Excluded autism as a comorbid diagnosisAllows comorbid autism diagnosisMay promote a better understanding of justice-involved youths' social dysfunction, disengagement, and inattention to authority; may also allow for more effective management of youths' disruptive behavior during justice system transitions
    Symptoms must be present in two or more settings (i.e., school, work, home)Allows for symptom observation in additional situations (e.g., with relatives or friends)Reduces emphasis on particular settings where stressors like trauma may better account for symptoms
    N/AAdds severity specifiers (i.e., mild, moderate, severe)May provide more clinically relevant information and assist in identifying treatment needs
        Conduct disorder (CD)N/AAdds “with limited prosocial emotions” specifierMay impress upon juvenile justice decision makers that youths with such a specifier are not amenable to treatment
        Intermittent explosive disorder (IED)Emphasized physical acts of aggression in description of behavioral outburstsIncludes physical, verbal and noninjurious/nondestructive aggression in descriptionMay improve understanding of the increasingly high rates of female youths, who may be more likely than males to engage in other forms of aggression, entering the juvenile justice system for anger-based, violent crimes, such as robbery, aggravated assault, and murder
    Outbursts must be of low frequency/high intensityOutbursts may also be of high frequency/low intensityMay increase IED diagnosis among justice-involved youths; may also improve understanding and treatment of youths who chronically reoffend through aggressive acts not better explained by situational factors (e.g., attainment of basic human needs such as food, money, shelter)
        Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD)N/AProblematic behaviors must occur with at least one nonsibling individualDisregards context-specific variables that may promote delinquency
    Required a pattern of negativistic, hostile, and defiant behaviorGroups symptoms into three types: angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, and vindictivenessEmphasizes oppositional mood or attitude in addition to behavior; increases likelihood of ODD diagnosis
    Required frequency not discussedRequires that symptoms occur at least once per weekDecreases likelihood of ODD diagnosis for youths who occasionally exhibit oppositional behavior
    N/AAdds severity specifiers (i.e., mild, moderate, severe) based on the number of settings in which symptoms occurMay provide more clinically relevant information and assist in identifying treatment needs
        Substance use disorders (SUDs)Recurrent substance use must contribute to distress or impairment in several situations (e.g., legal problems); separate abuse and dependence criteriaRemoves legal difficulties requirement and combines abuse and dependence criteriaMay result in overdiagnosis in justice-involved youths, given that changes do not include specifiers that recognize adolescent physiological sensitivity to, and heterogeneous, subtle patterns of, tolerance and withdrawal
    N/AAdds “risky use” criterion (“recurrent use in situations in which it is physically hazardous”)May overemphasize developmentally normative sensation-seeking and experimentation; may result in overdiagnosing SUDs in justice-involved youths
    Requires the presence of three symptoms in a 12-month periodRequires the presence of two symptoms in a 12-month period
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 44 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 44, Issue 4
1 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice
Emily Haney-Caron, Leah Brogan, Amanda NeMoyer, Sharon Kelley, Kirk Heilbrun
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2016, 44 (4) 457-469;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Diagnostic Changes to DSM-5: The Potential Impact on Juvenile Justice
Emily Haney-Caron, Leah Brogan, Amanda NeMoyer, Sharon Kelley, Kirk Heilbrun
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2016, 44 (4) 457-469;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Impact of Diagnosis on Stages of Juvenile Justice Involvement
    • Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders Among Justice-Involved Youths
    • Impact of DSM-5 Diagnostic Changes on Youth Involvement in the Juvenile Justice System
    • Limitations of Diagnosis for Juvenile Justice Decision Making
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults
  • Legal and Ethics Considerations in Capacity Evaluation for Medical Aid in Dying
  • Mental Health Aftercare Availability for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth in New York City
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law