Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

Psychiatric Evidence and Due Process in Firearms Rights Restoration

Liza H. Gold and Donna Vanderpool
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2018, 46 (3) 309-321; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003768-18
Liza H. Gold
Dr. Gold is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Arlington, VA. Ms. Vanderpool is Vice President for Risk Management, Professional Risk Management Services, Inc., Arlington, VA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna Vanderpool
Dr. Gold is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Arlington, VA. Ms. Vanderpool is Vice President for Risk Management, Professional Risk Management Services, Inc., Arlington, VA.
MBA, JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    States With Statutory Mental Health Evidence Requirements (Other Than Mental Health Records)

    State and StatuteFA*Risk Assessment† Specifically RequiredType of Professional SpecifiedEvidence SpecificationsTime Limits
    Delaware
    DE ST 11 §1448A
    YesYesMedical doctor or psychiatrist licensed in DECertificate that person no longer has a mental disorder that “interferes with or handicaps the person from handling deadly weapons” AND Board has authority to require petitioner “undergo a clinical evaluation and risk assessment.”No
    Georgia
    GA ST §16–11-129
    NoYes: danger to others
    No: danger to self
    Superintendent of any mental hospital or treatment centerOptional
    Court may require any such person to sign a waiver authorizing the superintendent of any mental hospital or treatment center to make to the judge a recommendation regarding whether such person is a threat to the safety of others.
    No
    Hawaii
    HI ST §134–6.5
    YesNoNoMedical documentation that petitioner is no longer adversely affected by condition that resulted in adjudication or commitment and is not likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety.No
    Indiana
    IN ST §33–23-15–2
    Maine
    ME ST 15 §393
    Yes
    No
    No
    No
    Psychiatrist or psychologist licensed in IN
    Independent psychologist or psychiatrist licensed in ME
    Recent mental health evaluation.
    Report specifically stating that circumstances that led to involuntary commitment have changed, that applicant is not likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety, and that granting relief will not be contrary to the public interest.
    Note: State maintains list of providers willing to conduct evaluations.
    No
    No
    Maryland
    MD ST Pub Saf §5–133.3
    YesYesBoard certified in psychiatry or psychologyForm stating: 1) length of time applicant has not had symptoms that cause applicant to be a danger to the applicant or others; 2) length of time that applicant has been compliant with mental illness treatment plan; 3) opinion as to whether applicant, because of mental illness, would be a danger to self if allowed to possess a firearm and reasons for the opinion; and 4) opinion as to whether applicant, because of mental illness, would be a danger to others or poses risk to public safety if allowed to possess a firearm.Form must be completed within 30 days of submission of application
    Note: State law provides immunity for professional in providing opinion/certification.
    Massachusetts
    MA ST 123 §36C
    YesNoLicensed physician or clinical psychologistOptional:
    Court may consider evidence that person no longer has the disease or condition that caused the disability or that disease or condition has been successfully treated for a period of 3 consecutive years.
    No
    Minnesota
    MN ST §624.713
    NoNoLicensed medical doctor or clinical psychologistOptional:
    Court may consider evidence that person no longer has the disease or condition that caused the disability or that disease or condition has been successfully treated for a period of 3 consecutive years.
    No
    New York
    NY ST Ment.Hyg. §7.09
    NY ADC 14 NYCRR 543.5
    YesYesQualified psychiatrist, defined as board certified or board eligibleOptional:
    Applicant may provide an evaluation, which should include opinion, and basis for opinion, as to whether applicant's record and reputation are such that “applicant will or will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety” and whether granting relief “would be contrary to public interest” AND
    Psychiatric evaluation performed no earlier than 90 days before filing application
    “the Office reserves the right to request that the applicant undergo a clinical evaluation and risk assessment.”
    Oklahoma
    21 OK ST §1290.27
    Oregon
    OR ST §166.274
    OR ADC §859–300-0050
    Yes
    Yes
    No
    Yes
    No
    1. Licensed psychiatrist or psychologist, but not petitioner's current or previous provider
    2. Optional: Letter from current mental health practitioner
    Psychological or psychiatric evidence whether petitioner is a danger to self or others.
    1. An independent forensic mental health assessment which shall include, at a minimum, an opinion and a basis for that opinion, of petitioner's interpersonal violence and risk of self-harm.
    2. Optional: Records may also include letter from petitioner's current treating mental health practitioner, if any. Letter may contain the petitioner's current medical health diagnosis, list of currently prescribed psychiatric medicines and dosage, history of compliance with medication, and any other information practitioner deems relevant to petitioner possessing a firearm.
    No
    Must be performed no more than 90 days before submission of petition
    Rhode Island
    RI ST § 11–47-63
    NoYesMedical doctor or psychiatrist licensed in RICertificate that person no longer has a mental disorder “which interferes or handicaps the person from handling deadly weapons” ANDNo
    “Board shall have the authority to require that the petitioner undergo a clinical evaluation and risk assessment.”
    South Carolina
    SC ST §23–31-1030
    YesYes“Department of Mental Health” or “physician licensed in SC specializing in mental health”Current evaluation [documented on form] presented by petitioner specifically addressing whether, due to mental defectiveness or mental illness, petitioner poses a threat to self or the safety of the public.No
    Utah
    UT ST §76–10-532
    YesNoLicensed psychiatristMental health evaluation to include statement regarding: 1) nature of commitment, finding, or adjudication that resulted in restriction on petitioner's ability to purchase or possess a dangerous weapon; 2) petitioner's previous and current mental health treatment; 3) petitioner's previous violent behavior, if any; 4) petitioner's current mental health medications and medication management; 5) length of time petitioner has been stable; 6) external factors that may influence petitioner's stability; 7) ability of petitioner to maintain stability with or without medication; and 8) whether the petitioner is dangerous to public safety.Evaluation within 30 days prior to filing petition
    West Virginia
    WV ST §61–7A-5
    YesNoLicensed psychologist or psychiatristCertificate of mental health examination that supports that petitioner is competent and not likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety.Mental health examination within 30 days prior to filing
    • ↵* Federally approved.

    • ↵† Defined as dangerous to self or others.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 46 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 46, Issue 3
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Psychiatric Evidence and Due Process in Firearms Rights Restoration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Psychiatric Evidence and Due Process in Firearms Rights Restoration
Liza H. Gold, Donna Vanderpool
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2018, 46 (3) 309-321; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003768-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Psychiatric Evidence and Due Process in Firearms Rights Restoration
Liza H. Gold, Donna Vanderpool
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2018, 46 (3) 309-321; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003768-18
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Mental Illness, Firearms Regulation, and RFD Programs
    • Mental Health Evidence for RFD Hearings
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mental Health Aftercare Availability for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth in New York City
  • Attitudes of Forensic Fellowship Psychiatry Directors towards an Applicant Match
  • Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law