Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticlePractice Resource: Prescribing in Corrections

AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial

Barry W. Wall, Peter Ash, Emily Keram, Debra A. Pinals and Christopher R. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2018, 46 (3 Supplement) S4-S79; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003778-18
Barry W. Wall
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Ash
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily Keram
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debra A. Pinals
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher R. Thompson
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Competence to Stand Trial Report: Sample Format

    1. Identifying information

    2. Source of referral, reason for referral, and statement of the charges

    3. Relevant legal standards and criteria

    4. Informed consent/statement of nonconfidentiality

    5. Dates and durations of examinations

    6. Sources of information: third-party information including records reviewed, collaterals sources interviewed

    7. Relevant background information

      • (a) Family history

      • (b) Personal history

      • (c) Education history

      • (d) Employment history

      • (e) Religious history

      • (f) Military history

      • (g) Sexual, marital, and relationship history

      • (h) Medical history

      • (i) Drug and alcohol history

      • (j) Legal history (juvenile and adult crimes and civil matters)

      • (k) Psychiatric history

    8. Relevant physical examination, imaging studies, and laboratory tests

    9. Psychological testing and assessment instruments administered; dates completed as well as any repeated testing, including notation regarding any nonstandard instruction or administration

    10. Current mental status examination (during the evaluation)

    11. Competence examination data

    12. Clinical conclusions and diagnoses that are relevant to competency

    13. Medicolegal conclusions including expert opinion on competence if formulated

    14. Opinion on restorability and commitability, if formulated

    15. Formulation and basis for the expert opinion(s)

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Learning Formats in a Competence Restoration Curriculum

    EducationBasic knowledge of the trial process, including the roles of the courtroom personnel, pleas, plea bargaining, charges, sentencing, and how to assist one's attorney
    Anxiety reductionTwo one-hour sessions per week with a psychologist to teach defendants anxiety management techniques suitable for use in court
    Guest lecturesWeekly meetings with court personnel (judges, defense attorneys, prosecutors, and probation officers) who speak to the defendants and answer questions
    Mock trialsRole-playing by defendants of various courtroom personnel in a scripted mock trial, with discussions led by clinical staff
    Video moduleVideotapes of actual courtroom proceedings watched by defendants, with discussions led by clinical staff
    Postrestoration moduleDiscussion of court experiences between incompetent defendants and defendants who have been to court
    Current legal eventsReview and discussion of news stories involving criminal trials
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Key Features of State Statutes

    JurisdictionSource of LawDefinition of IncompetenceWho May EvaluateTest for RestorabilityStatutory Provision for Involuntary Treatment for Competence RestorationWhere Restoration May OccurMaximum Time for Restoration
    AlabamaARCrp § 11.1 to 11.8Cannot consult with counsel with a reasonable degree of rational understanding of the facts and legal proceedingsPsychiatrist or psychologist appointed by commissioner of Dept. of MH/MRSubstantial probability of restoration in a reasonable timeNot specifiedDept. of MH/MR, or outpatient (if defendant is not dangerous and can consent to treatment)Indefinite, with annual review
    AlaskaAlaska Stat. § 12.47.100 to 110Cannot understand proceedings or assist with defenseQualified psychologist or psychiatristSubstantial probability of regaining competence in a reasonable timeNot specifiedCustody of the Commissioner of Health and Social Services180 days; 360 days if defendant is charged with violent crime and is presently dangerous
    ArizonaAriz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4501 to 17Cannot understand the nature and object of proceedings or assist with defenseTwo or more mental health experts, including at least one psychiatristSubstantial probability defendant will regain competence within 21 months of original finding of incompetenceDefendant is incompetent to refuse treatment and should be subject to involuntary treatmentProgram designated by county board of supervisors; Arizona State Hospital; jail; outpatient program; any court-approved facilityThe lesser of 21 months or the maximum sentence for the offense
    ArkansasArk. Code Ann. § 5-2-301 to 311Cannot understand proceedings or assist effectively in own defenseQualified psychiatrist or psychologistNot specifiedNot specifiedCustody of Director of Dept. of Human ServicesOne year
    CaliforniaCa. Penal Code § 1367 to 1376Cannot understand the nature of criminal proceedings or rationally assist counsel in conducting defensePsychiatrist, licensed psychologist, or any expert the court deems appropriateSubstantial likelihood that defendant will regain mental competence in the foreseeable futureDefendant lacks capacity and needs treatment; without medication, serious harm will resultState hospital; public or private facility; outpatient programFelony: lesser of 3 years or the maximum sentence for the most serious offense
    Misdemeanor: lesser of 1 year or the maximum sentence for the most serious offense
    ColoradoColo. Rev. Stat. § 16-8-110 to 115Cannot understand the nature and course of proceedings; or participate or assist in defense; or cooperate with defense counselNot specifiedSubstantial probability that defendant will be restored to competency within the foreseeable futureNot specifiedCustody of Dept. of Human Services; outpatient treatment at or under the supervision of a facilityMaximum term of confinement for offenses charged
    ConnecticutConn. Gen Stat. § 54-54 to 56dCannot understand proceedings or assist in defensePsychiatrist or clinical team (psychiatrist, psychologist, and either social worker or nurse)Substantial probability that the defendant, if provided with treatment, will regain competence within maximum period of any placement order permittedInvoluntary medication will render defendant competent; no less intrusive means to achieve adjudication; proposed treatment is narrowly tailored to minimize intrusion on liberty and privacy interests and will not cause unnecessary risk to defendant's health; seriousness of alleged crime is such that state interest in achieving adjudication overrides defendant's interest in self-determinationCustody of the Commissioner of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Commissioner of Children and Families or Commissioner of Mental Retardation, or any appropriate mental health facility or treatment programMaximum sentence that defendant could receive if convicted, or 18 months, whichever is less
    DelawareDel. Code. Ann. tit. 11, § 404Cannot understand the nature of proceedings, give evidence, or instruct counselNot specifiedNot specifiedNot specifiedDelaware Psychiatric CenterNot specified
    FloridaFla. Stat. Ann. § 916.12-145; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.210 to 215Does not meet Dusky criteriaAt least two mental health professionals, unless one opines that the defendant is incompetent and findings are stipulated toSubstantial probability that defendant's illness will respond to treatment and defendant will regain competence in reasonably foreseeable futureNot specifiedDefendants are committed for restoration only if incompetent and civilly committable. Otherwise, restoration occurs in community, correctional facility, or another facilityFelony: 5 years; misdemeanor: 1 year
    GeorgiaGa. Code Ann. § 17-7-130; Echols v. State, 255 S.E.2d. 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)Cannot participate intelligently in defendant's TrialNot specifiedSubstantial probability of attaining competence to stand trial in foreseeable futureNot specifiedDept. of Human ResourcesOne year
    HawaiiHaw. Rev. Stat. § 700-403 to 406; State v. Kotis, 984 P.2d 78 (Haw. 1999)Lacks capacity to understand proceedings or assist in defenseThree qualified psychiatrists in felony cases and 1 qualified psychiatrist in nonfelony casesSubstantial likelihood of becoming fit to proceed in the future“Detention, care, and treatment” may include a court order authorizing involuntary administration of antipsychotic drugsCustody of the Director of HealthNot specified
    IdahoIdaho Code Ann. § 18- 210 to 212Lacks capacity to understand proceedings or to assist with defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability defendant will be fit to proceed within foreseeable futureDefendant lacks capacity to give informed consentState hospital, institution, mental health center or Dept. of CorrectionsTwo hundred seventy days
    Illinois725 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/104- 11 to 104- 23Cannot understand nature and purpose of proceedings or assist in defenseOne or more licensed physicians, clinical psychologists, or psychiatristsLikelihood of attaining fitness within 1 year if provided with treatmentNot specifiedDept. of Human Services, or other appropriate public or private facility or treatment programOne year
    IndianaInd. Code § 35-36-3 to 4Cannot understand proceedings and assist in preparation of defenseTwo or 3 disinterested psychiatrists or psychologists; at least 1 must be psychologistSubstantial probability of attaining competence in foreseeable futureNot specifiedDivision of Mental Health and AddictionSix months
    IowaIowa Code § 812.3 to 812.9Cannot appreciate charge, understand proceedings, or assist effectively in defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability accused will regain capacity within a reasonable timeSomatic treatment is necessary and appropriate to restore defendant and defendant will not consent; director of facility may request order authorizing treatmentDangerous defendants: Dept. of Human Services or Dept. of Corrections for placement at Iowa Medical and Classification Center. Others: outpatient treatmentLesser of maximum term of confinement for alleged criminal offense, or 18 months
    KansasKan. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. § 22-3301 to 3306Cannot understand nature and purpose of proceedings, or cannot make or assist in making a defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability of attaining competence in foreseeable futureNot specifiedState security hospital; any appropriate county or private institutionSix months
    KentuckyKy. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 504.060, 504.090 to 110Cannot appreciate nature and consequences of proceedings or participate rationally in defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability of attaining competency in 360 daysNot specifiedTreatment facility; forensic psychiatric facility; Cabinet for Health and Family Services facilityMisdemeanor: 60 days; felony: not specified
    LouisianaLa. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 641-649Lacks capacity to understand proceedings or to assist in defenseSanity commissionMental capacity is likely to be restored within 90 days as a result of treatmentNot specifiedJail; Feliciana Forensic FacilityMaximum sentence defendant could receive if convicted
    MaineMe. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 101-B; State v. Lewis, 584 A.2d 622 (Me. 1990)Cannot understand nature and object of charges, comprehend condition in reference thereto, or cooperate with counsel to conduct a rational, reasonable defenseState Forensic Service; independent psychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability defendant will be competent in foreseeable futureNot specifiedCustody of Dept. of Health and Human ServicesOne year
    MarylandMd. Code Ann., Crim. proc. § 3-101 to 3-108; Sangster v. State, 541 A.2d 637 (Md. Ct. App. 1988)Cannot understand the nature of proceedings and assist in defenseHealth Dept. or community forensic screening programNot specifiedNot specifiedFacility that Health Department designatesTen years for capital case, 5 years for felony
    MassachusettsMass. Gen. Laws ch. 123, § 15-17; Commonwealth v. Vailes, 275 N.E.2d 893 (Mass. 1971)Does not meet Dusky criteriaOne or more qualified physicians psychologists for initial evaluationNot specifiedNot specifiedIf civilly commitable, hospitalization for treatmentMaximum time of imprisonment that person would serve before becoming eligible for parole for most serious charge
    MichiganMich. Comp. Laws § 330.2020 to 330.2044Cannot understand nature and object of proceedings or assist rationally in defenseCenter for Forensic Psychiatry; facility certified by Dept. of Mental HealthLikelihood of Defendant's attaining competence, if treatment for statutory time frameTo maintain the competence of the defendant to stand trial, pending and during trialDept. of Mental Health or any inpatient mental health facility if commitment is necessary for effective treatmentLesser of 15 months or one-third of maximum sentence
    MinnesotaMinn. R. Crim. P. Rule 20.01Cannot consult with defense counsel with reasonable degree of rational understanding or cannot understand proceedings and participate in defenseLicensed physician or consulting psychologist, knowledgeable, trained, and practicing in the diagnosis/treatment of the alleged impairmentSubstantial probability that with treatment or otherwise the defendant will ever attain competenceNot specifiedDefendant is civilly committed; place is not specifiedThree years, except for murder, for which time frame is not specified
    MississippiMiss. Uniform Rules of Circuit and County Court practice Rule 9.06; Gammage v. State, 510 So.2d 802 (Miss. 1987)Cannot consult with lawyer with reasonable degree of rational understanding; lacks rational and factual understanding of proceedingsPsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability of becoming competent in the foreseeable futureDefense attorney may authorize treatmentMississippi State Hospital or other appropriate mental health facilityWithin a reasonable time
    MissouriMo. Rev. Stat. § 552.020Cannot understand proceedings and assist in defensePsychiatrists, psychologists, or physicians with 1 year's training or experience in treating the mentally retarded or mentally illSubstantial probability of attaining fitness to proceed in forseeable futureNot specifiedCommitment to the Director of the Dept. of Mental HealthNot specified
    MontanaMont. Code Ann. § 46-14-103, 202, 206, 221, and 222Cannot understand proceedings and assist in defenseAt least 1 qualified psychiatrist, licensed clinical psychologist, or advanced-practice RNAppears that defendant will become fit to proceed in reasonably foreseeable futureOverriding justification for medically appropriate treatmentDept. of Public Health and Human Services, for placement in appropriate mental health or residential facilityIf court determines that so much time has elapsed since the commitment of the defendant that it would be unjust to resume the criminal proceedings, the court may dismiss the charge
    NebraskaNeb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1823Cannot understand nature and object of the proceedings, comprehend own condition in reference to such proceedings, and make a rational defensePhysician, psychiatrist, or psychologistSubstantial probability of becoming competent in the foreseeable futureNot specifiedState hospital for the mentally ill or other appropriate state- owned or -operated facilitySix months initial, maximum length not specified
    NevadaNev Rev. Stat. § 178.399 to 178.460Does not meet Dusky criteriaTwo psychiatrists, 2 psychologists, or 1 psychiatrist and 1 psychologist, certified by Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services of the Department of HHSSubstantial probability that treatment can restore competence and that defendant will attain competence or receive pronouncement of judgment in forseeable futureInvoluntary administration of medication if appropriate for treatment to restore competenceCommitted to Administrator of Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services, or outpatient treatmentLesser of 10 years or longest period of incarceration provided for alleged crime
    New HampshireN.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 135:17Does not meet Dusky criteriaPsychiatrist on staff of any public institution, or private psychiatristReasonable likelihood that defendant can be restored to competence through appropriate treatment within 12 monthsNot specifiedState mental health system; secure psychiatric unit; or outpatient treatmentTwelve months
    New JerseyN.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:4-5, 4-6Cannot understand proceedings and assist with defenseAt least 1 qualified psychiatrist or licensed psychologistSubstantially probable that defendant could regain competence within foreseeable futureNot specifiedCustody of Commissioner of Human Services for inpatient treatment if defendant is dangerous, or outpatient treatmentInitial 3 months, maximum time frame not indicated
    New MexicoN.M. Stat. § 31-9-1 to 31-9-1.5Does not meet Dusky criteriaPsychologist, psychiatrist, or other professional recognized by district court as an expertProbability of defendant's attaining competence within 9 months of original finding of incompetenceNot specifiedDept. of Health in a secure, locked facilityMaximum sentence defendant would have received if convicted
    New YorkN.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 730.10 to 730.70Cannot understand proceedings and assist with defenseTwo qualified psychiatrists (psychiatrist or psychologist); if 2 psychiatrists disagree, a 3rd psychiatrist is appointedNot specifiedNot specifiedFacility designed by Commissioner of Mental Health or MR/DDTwo-thirds of maximum term for highest-class felony charged
    North CarolinaN.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A 1001-1009Cannot understand nature and object of proceedings, comprehend situation in reference to the proceedings, and assist with defense in a rational or reasonable mannerImpartial medical experts, including forensic psychiatrists approved under rules of the Commission for Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities, and Substance Abuse ServicesLikelihood of defendant's gaining capacity to proceed, to the extent that the hospital, institution, or individual can make such a judgmentNot specifiedCivil commitment to hospital or other institution; if given bail, custody of designated person or organization agreeing to supervise defendantMaximum term of confinement for the crime charged or 5 years (misdemeanor) or 10 years (felony) from date of incapacity to proceed
    North DakotaN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-04-04 to 04-09Cannot understand proceedings and assist with defensePsychiatrist or licensed psychologistWhether defendant will attain fitness to proceed or ability to effectively communicate with counsel in the foreseeable futureNot specifiedCivil commitmentMaximum period for which the defendant could be sentenced
    OhioOhio Rev. Code Ann § 2945.37-39Cannot understand nature and objective of proceedings and assist with defensePsychiatrist, or licensed clinical psychologist who satisfies the satutory criteria or works for a certified forensic centerLikelihood of being restored to competence within 1 year if treatedMedication is necessary to restore competence; defendant lacks capacity to give informed consent or refuses medicationState hospital; MR/DD facility; community mental health or Mental retardation facility; psychiatrist or other MI/MR professionalThirty or 60 days for misdemeanors; 6 months for lesser felonies; 12 months for major felonies
    OklahomaOkla.Stat. tit. 22, § 1175.1 to 1175.8Cannot understand nature of charges and proceedings, and effectively and rationally assist with defensePsychiatrist, psychologist, or licensed mental health professional with forensic trainingWhether person can attain competence within reasonable period of time if given treatment, therapy, or trainingCourt shall order defendant to undergo treatment, therapy, or give training that will restore competenceDept. of Mental Health and Substance Abuse ServicesLesser of maximum sentence for most serious offense charged, or 2 years
    OregonOr. Rev. Stat. § 161.360 to 161.370Cannot understand nature of proceedings, assist and cooperate with counsel, and participate in defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability in foreseeable future that defendant will have capacity to stand trialNot specifiedState hospital; outpatient treatment; secure intensive community inpatient facility for juvenilesSo much time has elapsed that it would be unjust to resume criminal proceedings
    PennsylvaniaPa. Stat. Ann. § 7402-7406Cannot understand the nature or object of proceedings and participate and assist in defenseAt least 1 psychiatristSubstantial probability of attaining competence in the foreseeable futureCourt is reasonably certain that involuntary treatment will restore competenceNot specifiedLesser of maximum sentence imposed for the crime charged or 10 years. For murder, no limit on restoration period
    Rhode IslandR.I. Gen. Laws § 40.1-5.3-3Cannot understand character and consequences of proceedings, or cannot properly assist with defensePhysicianWhether defendant will regain competence within maximum period of placementNot specifiedDangerous defendants: facility established pursuant to § 40.1- 5.3-1, or to general wards of the Institute of Mental Health; outpatient treatmentTwo-thirds of maximum sentence for most serious offense charged
    South CarolinaS.C. Code Ann. § 44-23-410 to 460Cannot understand proceedings or assist defenseTwo psychiatrists designated by the Dept. of Mental Health or Dept. of Disabilities and Special NeedsSubstantial probability of attaining competence in forseeable futureNot specifiedAppropriate facility of Dept. of Mental Health or Dept. of Disabilities and Special NeedsMaximum period to which the person could have been sentenced if convicted as charged
    South DakotaS.D. Codified Laws § 23A- 10A-1 to 16Cannot understand nature and consequences of proceedings and assist properly in defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability that in the foreseeable future defendant will attain capacity to permit the trial to proceedNot specifiedHuman Services Center; state developmental centers; adjustment training center mental health center; or other facility approved by Dept. of Human ServicesMaximum penalty allowable for most serious charge
    TennesseeTenn. Code Ann. § 33-7-301 to 302Does not meet Dusky criteriaCommunity mental health center, licensed private practitioner, or outpatient evaluation by state hospitalNot specifiedNot specifiedForensic services unit or community-based serviceNot specified
    TexasTex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 46B.001 to 171Does not meet Dusky criteriaPsychiatrist or psychologistWhether defendant will obtain competence in foreseeable futureMedication is medically appropriate and in defendant's best interest; state has compelling interest in defendant's being competent; no less invasive means of obtaining competence; medication will not unduly prejudice the defendant's rights or defense theories at trialCommunity, mental health or MR facilityMaximum term for offense on which defendant would be tried
    UtahUtah Code Ann. § 77-15-1 to 6Unable to have rational and factual understanding of proceedings him or potential punishment, or cannot consult with counsel and participate in proceedings with a reasonable degree of rational understandingAt least 2 mental health experts not involved in the current treatment of the defendantSubstantial probability that the defendant may become competent in forseeable futureNot specifiedDept. of Human ServicesMaximum period of incarceration that defendant could receive if convicted
    VermontVt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4814-4822Does not meet Dusky criteriaDesignated mental health professionalNot specifiedNot specifiedCustody of Commissioner of Developmental and Mental Health ServicesIndeterminate, as long as person is civilly committable
    VirginiaVa. Code Ann. § 19.2-169.1 to 169.3Cannot understand proceedings or assist attorney with defensePsychiatrists, psychologists or master-level psychologistsRestorable in foreseeable futureNot specifiedOutpaitent; hospital designated by the Commissioner of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuses ServicesLesser of maximum sentence if convicted of charges or 5 years
    WashingtonWash. Rev. Code § 10.77.010 to 10.77.092Cannot understand nature of proceedings and assist with defenseAt least 2 qualified experts or professional personsFuther treatment is likely to restore competenceFor serious offensesState hospital; other facility as determined by department or under guidance and control of professional personMaximum possible penal sentence for any offense charged, or 180 days
    West VirginiaW. Va. Code § 27-6A-1 to 5Cannot participate substantially in defense and understand nature and consequences of trialOne or more psychiatrists, or psychiatrist and psychologistSubstantial likelihood that defendant will attain competence within 6 monthsNot specifiedMental health facilityNine months
    WisconsinWis. Stat. § 971.13Cannot understand the proceedings or assist with defenseOne or more psychiatrists having specialized knowledge and deemed appropriate by court to evaluate and report on defendantLikelihood that defendant, if treated, may be restored to competence within statutory time periodCourt may order defendant to receive medication for duration of criminal proceedingsDept. of Health and Family Services for placement in appropriate institutionLesser of 12 months or maximum sentence for most serious offense
    WyomingWyo. Stat. Ann. § 7-11-301 to 303Cannot comprehend situation, understand the nature and object of proceedings, conduct defense rationally, or cooperate with counsel to use available defensesLicensed psychiatrist, or other physician with forensic training, or licensed psychologist with forensic trainingSubstantial probability that accused will regain fitness to proceedNot specifiedState hospital or other facility designated by the courtNot specified
    U.S. Federal18 U.S.C.S. § 4241Cannot understand nature and consequences of proceedings and assist properly with defensePsychiatrist or psychologistSubstantial probability that in the foreseeable future, defendant will become competentSell v. United States (2003)Custody of Attorney General for treatment in a suitable facilityInitial hospitalization for four months; thereafter, for “reasonable period of time”
    US MilitaryU.C.M.J. § 876b; R.C.M. 706, 909; 18 U.S.C.S. § 4241Cannot understand nature of proceedings or conduct or cooperate intelligently in defenseA board of 1 or more persons; each member must be physician or psychologist; normally, at least one member is psychiatrist or psychologistSame as federal lawSell v. United States (2003)Same as federal lawSame as federal law
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 46 (3 Supplement)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 46, Issue 3 Supplement
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial
Barry W. Wall, Peter Ash, Emily Keram, Debra A. Pinals, Christopher R. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2018, 46 (3 Supplement) S4-S79; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003778-18

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
AAPL Practice Resource for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial
Barry W. Wall, Peter Ash, Emily Keram, Debra A. Pinals, Christopher R. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2018, 46 (3 Supplement) S4-S79; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003778-18
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Statement of Intent and Development Process
    • Overview
    • Definitions
    • I. Background
    • II. Special Topics in Recent U.S. Case Law
    • III. Agency Relationships
    • IV. Ethics
    • V. Cultural Considerations
    • VI. The Interview
    • VII. Collateral Data
    • VIII. Assessment Instruments
    • IX. Formulating the Forensic Opinion
    • X. Preparing the Written Report
    • XI. The Adjudicative Competence of Minors
    • XII. Restoration of Competence to Stand Trial
    • XIII. Summary
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Resource for Prescribing in Corrections
  • AAPL Practice Resource for Prescribing in Corrections
Show more Practice Resource: Prescribing in Corrections

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law