Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model

Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao and Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2019, 47 (2) 217-223; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003834-19
Scott E. Kirkorsky
Dr. Kirkorsky is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow at the University of California-Davis. Dr. Shao is a Forensic Psychiatrist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia. Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanda Shao
Dr. Kirkorsky is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow at the University of California-Davis. Dr. Shao is a Forensic Psychiatrist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia. Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix.
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph D. Bloom
Dr. Kirkorsky is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow at the University of California-Davis. Dr. Shao is a Forensic Psychiatrist practicing in Atlanta, Georgia. Dr. Bloom is Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Evolution of the Arizona Guilty Except Insane Defense

    Trial PhaseBefore 19931993: Addition of PSRB2007: Addition of Corrections
        TestMental disease or defect resulted in not knowing the nature or quality of the act or that the act was wrongMental disease or defect of such severity he did not know criminal act was wrong; exclusions for impulsive acts and antisocial behaviors
        EvidenceClear and convincing
        Burden of proofDefendant
        VerdictNot responsible for criminal conduct by reason of insanityGuilty except insane
    Post-verdict
        JurisdictionCourtNot serious: Court
    Serious: PSRB*
    Not serious: Court (until release hearing)
    Serious: Incarceration in the Department of Corrections under the jurisdiction of PSRB
        Possible length of jurisdictionWhen criteria for discharge† is met, the person is no longer mentally ill or dangerousNot serious: Up to 75 days (discharge or civil commitment may follow)
    Serious: Length of presumptive sentence
        Initial commitmentArizona State Hospital
        Length of initial evaluation periodCourt hearing within 50 days; subsequent hearings no sooner than 6 months; for a serious offense, cannot be released for at least 120 days‡
    A release hearing may be held whenever the secure mental health facility petitions the court
    Not serious: Up to 75 days
    Serious: PSRB hearing 120 days after initial commitment; no sooner than 6 months thereafter
    Disposition
        Not seriousCriteria same for Serious or Not Serious (see below)Continued hospitalization or civil commitment for persistent mental disease or defect
    Discharge when a defendant proves by clear and convincing evidence he no longer suffers from mental disease or defect
        Serious
            Continued hospitalizationSuffering from mental disease/defect or dangerPSRB finds applicant still suffers from a mental disease or defect and is dangerous
            Conditional releaseGranted by court based on same criteria for conditional release used in civil commitmentPSRB finds applicant still suffers from mental disease or defect but is not dangerous (requires a treatment plan to be in place)
            Unconditional release#Not applicableApplicant proves to PSRB by clear and convincing evidence “he no longer suffers from a mental disease or defect” and is not dangerous
            DischargeApplicant proves he is no longer suffering from mental disease or defect and no longer dangerousNot applicable: There is no mechanism for a person adjudicated guilty except insane to be discharged from insanity jurisdiction prior to the end of the presumptive sentence
            Transfer to correctionsNot applicablePSRB finds person no longer needs treatment, but “is dangerous or has a propensity to reoffend”
    • Arizona Guilty Except Insane Defense (A.R.S. 13-502, 13-3994). PSRB, Psychiatric Security Review Board.

    • ↵* Treatment facility may petition the court to hold a hearing at any time.

    • ↵† Discharge: no longer under insanity jurisdiction.

    • ↵‡ Serious Offense: Case involves death or threat of death or serious physical injury to another person determined by trial court.

    • # Unconditional Release: Termed “release” in the statute. Person remains under jurisdiction of the PSRB, but with less stringent supervision and presumably no requirement of a supervised treatment plan.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 47 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 47, Issue 2
1 Jun 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model
Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao, Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2019, 47 (2) 217-223; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003834-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Migration of Arizona's Post-Insanity Defense Procedures to a Modified GBMI Model
Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao, Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2019, 47 (2) 217-223; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003834-19
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Arizona's PSRB from 1993 to 2007
    • Modified GBMI from 2007 to the Present
    • The System in Practice
    • GBMI
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Attitudes of Forensic Fellowship Psychiatry Directors towards an Applicant Match
  • Suicide Prevention Effects of Extreme Risk Protection Order Laws in Four States
  • Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law