Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

Legal and Ethics Considerations in Reporting Sexual Exploitation by Previous Providers

Michael R. MacIntyre and Jacob M. Appel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online June 2020, 48 (2) 166-175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003911-20
Michael R. MacIntyre
Dr. MacIntyre is a Fellow in the Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Appel is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Education, Director of Ethics Education in Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob M. Appel
Dr. MacIntyre is a Fellow in the Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship Program, University of California, Los Angeles, California. Dr. Appel is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Medical Education, Director of Ethics Education in Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
MD, JD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    States with Laws Outlawing Psychiatrist–Patient and Psychotherapist–Patient Sexual Relationships

    StateLegal Statute Banning RelationshipTerm Used in Law for Therapist
    AlaskaAS § 11.41.420 (2018)Health care worker
    ArizonaAz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1418 (2019)Behavioral health professional
    CaliforniaCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 729 (2019)Physician and surgeon, psychotherapist
    ColoradoC.R.S. 18-3-405.5 (2018)Psychotherapist
    ConnecticutConn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-71 (2019)Psychotherapist
    Delaware11 Del C. § 761 (2019)Health professional
    District of ColumbiaD.C. Code § 22-3015 (2019)Professional services of a medical or counseling nature
    FloridaFla. Stat. § 491.0112 (2019)Psychotherapist
    GeorgiaO.C.G.A § 16-6-5.1 (2018)Practitioner of psychotherapy
    IdahoIdaho Code § 18-919 (2019)Medical care provider, physician, psychotherapist
    Illinois740 ILCS 140 (2019)Psychotherapist
    IowaIowa Code § 709.15 (2018)Counselor or therapist
    Maine17-A M.R.S. § 253 (2019)Psychiatrist, psychologist, or licensed as a social worker
    MichiganMCLS § 750.520e (2019)Mental health professional
    MinnesotaMinn. Stat. § 609.344 (2019)Psychotherapist
    New HampshireRSA 632-A (2019)Actor provides therapy
    New MexicoN.M. Stat. Ann. § 30-9-10; 30-9-11 (2019)Psychotherapist
    New YorkNY CLS Penal § 130.05 (2019); NY CLS Educ § 6530.44 (2019)Health care provider or mental health care provider; in the practice of psychiatry
    North CarolinaN.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.41 (2019)Psychotherapist
    North DakotaN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-20.06.1 (2019)Therapist
    OhioORC Ann. 2907.03 (2018)Mental health professional
    South DakotaS.D. Codified Laws § 22-22-28, 22-22-29 (2019)Psychotherapist
    TennesseeTenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-201 (2019)Therapist
    TexasTex. Penal Code § 22.011 (2017)Mental health services provider
    UtahUtah Code Ann. § 76-5-406 (2018)Health professional
    WashingtonWAC 246-16-100 (2019)Health care provider
    WisconsinWis. Stat. § 940.22 (2019)Physician, therapist
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary of Specific State Laws Addressing Reporting of Psychotherapist Sexual Exploitation Learned During the Course of Treatment

    StateLegal StatuteDuty to PatientPenalty for not Following the Law
    CaliforniaCal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 728. (2019)Must provide and discuss with the patient a brochure published by the state that delineates the rights and remedies for patients who have been involved sexually with their psychotherapists.Failure to comply with this section constitutes unprofessional conduct.
    Rhode IslandRI Gen. Laws Ann. § 5-63.1-2 (2019)Practitioner must ask if patients wants to make a report and must make a report if the patient says yes.Any person required to make a written report under this section who fails to do so shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) and shall be subject to discipline by the appropriate licensing board of registration or equivalent oversight authority.
    TexasTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 81.006 (2017)Clinician has a duty to report. Clinician must inform the patient of this duty and determine whether the patient wants to be anonymous in the report.Subject to disciplinary action by that person's appropriate licensing board and also commits an offense. An offense under this subsection is a Class C misdemeanor.
    VirginiaCode of Virginia § 54.1-2400.4 (2019)The clinician must advise the patient of the patient's right to report such misconduct to the Department of Health Professions. The clinician must provide the department's toll-free complaint hotline number for consumer complaints and explain how to file a report.Civil penalty not to exceed $100.
    WisconsinWis. Stat. § 940.22 (2019)The therapist must explain to the patient the violation that occurred and ask if the patient would like the clinician to file a report. If the patient would like to make a report, the therapist must file a report to the respective licensing department of the sexually exploitive therapist and the district attorney within 30 days.Guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Summary of the Medical Board Policies, Rules, and Laws by State Regarding Mandatory Reporting by Psychiatrists of Sexually Exploitive Therapists, as Discovered During Treatment of a Patient

    StateOfficial Mandated Reporter PolicyStandard for Reporting According to the Statute
    AlabamaNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    AlaskaMandated to report, 12 AAC 40.967 (2019)Facts known to the licensee regarding incompetent conduct as defined by Alaska Stat. § 08.64.326 (2019)
    ArizonaMandated to report, A.R.S. § 32-3251 (2019)Any information that appears to show that a doctor of medicine is or may be medically incompetent, is or may be guilty of unprofessional conduct or is or may be mentally or physically unable safely to engage in the practice of medicine
    ArkansasNo official mandated reportingN/A
    CaliforniaNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardSee Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 729. (2019)
    ColoradoMandated to report, C.R.S. 12-36-118 (2018)Duty to report to the board any licensee known, or upon information and belief, to have violated any of the provisions of C.R.S. 12-36-117(1)
    ConnecticutMandated to report, Conn. Gen. Stat. §20-13d (2019)Has any information which appears to show that a physician is or may be unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill or safety for any of the reasons listed in Conn. Gen. Stat. § 20-13c
    DelawareNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    District of ColumbiaNo official mandated reportingN/A
    FloridaaNo official mandated reportingN/A
    GeorgiaNo official mandated reportingN/A
    HawaiibNo official mandated reportingN/A
    IdahoMandated to report, Idaho Code § 54-1818 (2019)Possessing knowledge of a violation of Idaho Code § 54-1814 (2019) by any other physician and surgeon licensed to practice medicine
    IllinoisNo official mandated reportingN/A
    IndianacMandated to report, 844 IAC 5-2-8 (2019)Personal knowledge based upon a reasonable belief that another practitioner holding the same license has engaged in illegal, unlawful, incompetent or fraudulent conduct in the practice of medicine
    IowaMandated to report, IAC § 653-22.2 (2019)Knowledge means any information or evidence of reportable conduct acquired by personal observation, from a reliable or authoritative source, or under circumstances causing the licensee to believe that wrongful acts may have occurred.
    KansasdNo official mandated reportingN/A
    KentuckyNo official mandated reportingN/A
    LouisianaNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    MaineMandated to report, 24 M.R.S. § 2505 (2019)Reasonable knowledge of acts of the physician … amounting to gross or repeated medical malpractice … that endangers the health or safety of patients, professional incompetence, unprofessional conduct, or sexual misconduct identified by board rule
    MarylandbNo official mandated reportingN/A
    MassachusettsMandated to report, ALM GL ch. 112, § 5F (2019)… shall report to the board any person who there is reasonable basis to believe is in violation of section five, or any of the regulations of the board
    MichiganMandated to report, MCLS § 333.16222 (2019)Knowledge that another licensee or registrant has committed a violation under § 16221, article 7, or article 8
    MinnesotaMandated to report, Minn. Stat. Ann. § 147.111 (2019)Personal knowledge of any conduct which the person reasonably believes constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under § 147.01 to 147.22
    MississippiNo official mandated reportingN/A
    MissouriNo official mandated reportingN/A
    MontanaeMandated to report, MCA 37-3-401 (2019)… shall … report to the board any information that appears to show that … a physician is guilty of unprofessional conduct
    NebraskafNo official mandated reportingN/A
    NevadagNo official mandated reportingN/A
    New HampshireNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    New JerseyMandated to report, N.J.S.A. 45 1-37 (2019)If that health care professional is in possession of information which reasonably indicates that another health care professional has demonstrated an impairment, gross incompetence, or unprofessional conduct
    New MexicoNo official mandated reportingN/A
    New YorkMandated to report NY CLS Pub Health § 230 (2019)Any information … which reasonably appears to show that a licensee is guilty of professional misconduct
    North CarolinaNo clear mandated reporting, per medical boardPer North Carolina medical board, reporting would “depend on each individual case.”
    North DakotaNo official mandated reportingN/A
    OhiohNo official mandated reportingN/A
    OklahomaMandated to report Oklahoma § 435 10-7-4 (2019)Unprofessional conduct includes failure to report to the Board unprofessional conduct committed by another physician.
    OregonMandated to report, ORS § 676.150 (2018)Reasonable cause to believe that another licensee has engaged in prohibited or unprofessional conduct
    PennsylvaniaNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    Rhode IslandMandated reporting at the request of the patientSee Table 2 and RI Gen. Laws Ann. § 5-63.1-2 (2019)
    South CarolinaNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    South DakotabNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    TennesseeNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    TexasMandated to report Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 81.006 (2017)If the patient reports any sexual contact with a previous provider, clinician must report.
    UtahMandated to report, as per Utah medical board citing Utah Code 26-23a-2 (2018) and Utah Rule R156–67 (2019)Any health care provider who treats or cares for any person who has any … injury inflicted by … violation of any criminal statute of this state (referable to Utah Criminal Code 76-5-406 (2019)
    VermontNo official mandated reportingN/A
    VirginiaNo official mandated reportingSee Code of Virginia § 54.1-2400.4 (2019)
    WashingtonNo official mandated reportingN/A
    West VirginiaMandated to report W. Va. Code § 30-3-14 (2019)Report to the board any act of gross misconduct committed by another licensee of the board
    WisconsinMandated reporting at the request of the patient; see Wis. Stat. § 940.22 (2019)See Table 2 and Wis. Stat. § 940.22 (2019)
    WyomingNo official mandated reporting, per medical boardN/A
    • ↵a In Florida, a physician must report a sexually exploitive colleague if aware of misconduct, unless that information was uncovered during a treatment session as per Fla. Stat. § 456.059 (2018). Psychiatrists must maintain patient confidentiality.

    • ↵b Practitioners in Hawaii, South Dakota, and Maryland are encouraged to report sexually exploitive colleagues and are by law allowed, but not required, to break patient confidentiality to do so.

    • ↵c In Indiana, the law only requires mandated reporting to a peer-review committee, but not to the medical board.

    • ↵d In Kansas, a physician must report a sexually exploitive colleague if aware of misconduct, but K.S.A. § 65-4923 (2019) specifically states “[t]his subsection shall not be construed to modify or negate the physician–patient privilege, the psychologist–client privilege, or the social worker–client privilege as codified by Kansas statutes.” Furthermore, a report may only be made based on “direct involvement or observation of the incident.”

    • ↵e In Montana, only psychiatrists are mandated to report sexually exploitive behavior. A psychologist shall only report it with written permission of the client as per ARM 24.189.2305 (2019).

    • ↵f In Nebraska, a physician must report a sexually exploitive colleague if aware of misconduct as per R.R.S. Neb. § 38-1,125 (2019); these reports, however, only apply to “first-hand knowledge of the facts,” and Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-504 (2019) protects information learned from a patient during a course of treatment.

    • ↵g In Nevada, a physician must report a sexually exploitive colleague if aware of misconduct as per Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann § 630.3062 (2019), but NRS § 49.215 (2019) protects communication between the doctor and patient through a privilege held by the patient.

    • ↵h While the state has no mandated reporting, Ohio § 4731.22(F)(S) says anyone “may” report.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 48 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 48, Issue 2
1 Jun 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Legal and Ethics Considerations in Reporting Sexual Exploitation by Previous Providers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Legal and Ethics Considerations in Reporting Sexual Exploitation by Previous Providers
Michael R. MacIntyre, Jacob M. Appel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2020, 48 (2) 166-175; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003911-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Legal and Ethics Considerations in Reporting Sexual Exploitation by Previous Providers
Michael R. MacIntyre, Jacob M. Appel
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jun 2020, 48 (2) 166-175; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003911-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Mental Health and Social Correlates of Reincarceration of Youths as Adults
  • Legal and Ethics Considerations in Capacity Evaluation for Medical Aid in Dying
  • Mental Health Aftercare Availability for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth in New York City
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law