Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Article CommentaryAnalysis and Commentary

Evaluating Competency for Execution after Madison v. Alabama

Alexander H. Updegrove and Michael S. Vaughn
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2020, 48 (4) 530-535; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200003-20
Alexander H. Updegrove
Dr. Updegrove is Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas. Dr. Vaughn is Professor, Institute for Legal Studies in Criminal Justice, Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Vaughn
Dr. Updegrove is Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas. Dr. Vaughn is Professor, Institute for Legal Studies in Criminal Justice, Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 48 no. 4 530-535
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200003-20
PubMed 
32675330

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online December 23, 2020.

Article Versions

  • Latest version (July 16, 2020 - 09:49).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2020 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Alexander H. Updegrove, PhD and
  2. Michael S. Vaughn, PhD
  1. Dr. Updegrove is Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas. Dr. Vaughn is Professor, Institute for Legal Studies in Criminal Justice, Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
  1. Address correspondence to: Michael S. Vaughn, PhD. E-mail: mvaughn{at}shsu.edu.
View Abstract

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 48 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 48, Issue 4
1 Dec 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluating Competency for Execution after Madison v. Alabama
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evaluating Competency for Execution after Madison v. Alabama
Alexander H. Updegrove, Michael S. Vaughn
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2020, 48 (4) 530-535; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200003-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evaluating Competency for Execution after Madison v. Alabama
Alexander H. Updegrove, Michael S. Vaughn
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2020, 48 (4) 530-535; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200003-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Ford v. Wainwright
    • Panetti v. Quarterman (2007)
    • Madison v. Alabama (2019)
    • Best Practices for Evaluators
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • competency for execution
  • insanity
  • capital punishment
  • dementia

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law