Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
LetterLetters

Letters

Neil S. Kaye
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2021, 49 (3) 459; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.210071-21
Neil S. Kaye
Hockessin, DE
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • physician-assisted suicide
  • ethics
  • palliative care

Dear Editor:

In response to Dr. Anfang's editorial supporting physician-assisted suicide (PAS),1 I offer these opposing comments.

Physicians have adhered to codes of ethics since the 5th century BCE. Included are the Oath of Hippocrates and the oath of the great physician Maimonides. The United States of America was founded in 1776. Thomas Percival introduced our country's first medical ethics standards in 1803. These codes, adopted by the American Medical Association in 1847, are revised continuously, most recently in 2008. What has never changed is the requirement that physicians focus 100 percent of their efforts on healing.

Physicians are terrible at predicting death. After six months, fewer than 33 percent of predictions are correct. PAS relies on the physician informing patients of their life expectancy. If we can't do that with even a 50 percent accuracy, how can we assume the role of physician-advisor in helping a patient decide to commit suicide instead of seeking additional treatment or compassionate palliative care?

The myth that physicians can provide a speedy and pain-free death needs to be confronted with reality. Nothing in our training teaches us how to help people kill themselves. There are no courses in medical school, no CMEs, no conferences, no journals, and no controlled experiments to guide us. We are trained to heal, not to harm, and certainly not to kill (as is done in veterinary school.)

The American “experiment” with PAS, begun in Oregon, shows that the average time to death is 2 hours, but has been as long as 140 hours. Of these individuals, 10 percent vomited up the drugs they took, 2 percent awakened from their comas, and 33 percent took 30 hours to die. Although 25 percent were depressed, only 2 percent were ever referred for psychiatric treatment.2,3 And there is a “contagion effect”; Oregon's overall suicide rate is now 40 percent above the U.S. average.4 “Normalizing” suicide is not a message we should broadcast. More than 40,000 people kill themselves annually without involving physicians. Clearly, there is no great need to corrupt the medical profession by encouraging doctors to be handmaidens of self-inflicted death.

The most recent revision of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics states: “PAS occurs when a physician facilitates a patient's death by providing the necessary means and/or information to enable a patient to perform the life-ending act. Permitting physicians to engage in assisted suicide ultimately causes more harm than good. PAS is fundamentally incompatible with the physician's role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.”5

Physicians must aggressively respond to the needs of patients at the end of life. Physicians should not abandon a patient once it is determined that cure is impossible; must respect patient's autonomy; must provide emotional support and communicate effectively; and must provide comfort care and appropriate pain control.

Helping people kill themselves is not and should never be part of a treatment plan. Death is not just a medical event. It is a life event with dimensions in the physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual realms. Death is not a problem that can be solved with a prescription.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2021 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Anfang SA
    : One psychiatrist's perspective on physician-assisted death. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 49:9–11, 2021
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority: Oregon Death with Dignity Act – 2019 Data Summary, February 25, 2020. Available at: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/providerpartnerresources/evaluationresearch/deathwithdignityact/documents/year22.pdf. Accessed April 30, 2021
  3. 3.↵
    1. Al Rabadi L,
    2. LeBlanc M,
    3. Bucy T,
    4. et al
    : Trends in medical aid in dying in Oregon and Washington. JAMA Netw Open 2:e198648, 2019
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jones D,
    2. Paton D
    : How does legalization of physician-assisted suicide affect rates of suicide? South Med J 108:599–604, 2015
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    American Medical Association: AMA principles of Medical Ethics, Opinion 5.7. 2018. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/physician-assisted-suicide. Accessed April 30, 2021
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 49 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 49, Issue 3
1 Sep 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letters
Neil S. Kaye
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 459; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210071-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Letters
Neil S. Kaye
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2021, 49 (3) 459; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210071-21
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • physician-assisted suicide
  • ethics
  • palliative care

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law