Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherLegal Digest

Role of Expert Opinion in an Insanity Defense

Jessica Witt, Yuliang Hu and Lisa Anacker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2023, 51 (4) 587-589; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230095L1-23
Jessica Witt
Resident in Psychiatry
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuliang Hu
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Anacker
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 51 no. 4 587-589
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230095L1-23

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online December 8, 2023.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2023 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Jessica Witt, MD
  1. Resident in Psychiatry
  2. Department of Psychiatry
    University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
  1. Yuliang Hu, MD
  1. Resident in Psychiatry
  2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology
    Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota
  1. Lisa Anacker, MD
  1. Adjunct Clinical Assistant Professor
  2. Department of Psychiatry
    University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 51 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 51, Issue 4
1 Dec 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of Expert Opinion in an Insanity Defense
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Role of Expert Opinion in an Insanity Defense
Jessica Witt, Yuliang Hu, Lisa Anacker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2023, 51 (4) 587-589; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.230095L1-23

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Role of Expert Opinion in an Insanity Defense
Jessica Witt, Yuliang Hu, Lisa Anacker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2023, 51 (4) 587-589; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.230095L1-23
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Prosecutor's Argument in Opening and Closing Statements Not Prejudicial to Defendant or Defendant's Insanity Defense in the Absence of a Viable Insanity Defense
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prolonged Segregation of Those Incarcerated with Serious Mental Illness
  • NGMI and Double Jeopardy
  • Limitations on Competency Evaluation Requests
Show more Legal Digest

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • argument
  • insanity defense
  • prosecutorial misconduct

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law