In “Dissociative Identity Disorder: Medicolegal Challenges,” (JAAPL 2011;39(3):402–6), the author reported the court's finding in State v. Darnall, 614 P.2d 120 (Or. Ct. App. 1980) on page 403. The court did not make a finding that the defendant was “most likely malingering,” as was stated in the text. The original text of the article on this point has been removed, and an accurate statement of the court's finding has been inserted in the version of the article now available online. Readers of the 2011 print version are notified regarding this correction.
Footnotes
Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.
- © 2023 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
