Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherLegal Digest

Interpretation of the “One-Expert Rule” in Malpractice Litigation

Collin Shumate and Joseph R. Simpson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2024, 52 (1) 108-109; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230123L2-23
Collin Shumate
Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph R. Simpson
Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry (Voluntary) Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesKeck School of Medicine of USCUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, California
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 52 no. 1 108-109
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230123L2-23

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online March 11, 2024.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2024 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Collin Shumate, MD
  1. Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
  1. Joseph R. Simpson, MD, PhD
  1. Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry (Voluntary)

    Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
    Keck School of Medicine of USC
    University of Southern California
    Los Angeles, California

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 52 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 52, Issue 1
1 Mar 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Interpretation of the “One-Expert Rule” in Malpractice Litigation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Interpretation of the “One-Expert Rule” in Malpractice Litigation
Collin Shumate, Joseph R. Simpson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2024, 52 (1) 108-109; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.230123L2-23

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Interpretation of the “One-Expert Rule” in Malpractice Litigation
Collin Shumate, Joseph R. Simpson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2024, 52 (1) 108-109; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.230123L2-23
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Arizona Supreme Court Considers Whether a Treating Physician Can Answer Hypothetical Questions as a Fact Witness
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Prolonged Segregation of Those Incarcerated with Serious Mental Illness
  • NGMI and Double Jeopardy
  • Limitations on Competency Evaluation Requests
Show more Legal Digest

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • expert witness
  • fact witness
  • expert testimony
  • independent expert
  • one-expert rule

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law