Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

A Retrospective Analysis of Rates of Malingering in a Forensic Psychiatry Practice

Lillian J. Svete, William W. Tindell, Christopher J. McLouth and Timothy S. Allen
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2025, 53 (1) 26-34; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240083-24
Lillian J. Svete
Dr. Svete is a PGY-4 resident in psychiatry, and Dr. Allen is Assistant Professor, Forensic Psychiatry, College of Medicine, and Dr. McLouth is a Biostatistician and Assistant Professor, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Dr. Tindell is a psychiatrist, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
William W. Tindell
Dr. Svete is a PGY-4 resident in psychiatry, and Dr. Allen is Assistant Professor, Forensic Psychiatry, College of Medicine, and Dr. McLouth is a Biostatistician and Assistant Professor, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Dr. Tindell is a psychiatrist, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. McLouth
Dr. Svete is a PGY-4 resident in psychiatry, and Dr. Allen is Assistant Professor, Forensic Psychiatry, College of Medicine, and Dr. McLouth is a Biostatistician and Assistant Professor, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Dr. Tindell is a psychiatrist, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy S. Allen
Dr. Svete is a PGY-4 resident in psychiatry, and Dr. Allen is Assistant Professor, Forensic Psychiatry, College of Medicine, and Dr. McLouth is a Biostatistician and Assistant Professor, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Dr. Tindell is a psychiatrist, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Univariate (Unadjusted) Relationships between Malingering and Demographic and Clinical Factors

    Total SampleNo MalingeringMalingeringTest Statisticp-Value
    n = 1,300n = 983 (75.6%)n = 317 (24.4%)
    Age, mean (SD)45.7 (14.9)45.7 (12.6)45.1 (10.5)0.730.467
    Sex, n (%)———6.050.014
     Male808 (62.2)593 (73.4)215 (26.6)——
     Female491 (37.8)390 (79.4)101 (20.6)——
    Education, mean (SD)12.812.8 (2.6)12.2 (2.4)3.93<.001
    Education, n (%)———18.46<.001
     <12 years181 (14.0)133 (73.5)48 (26.5)——
     12 years or GED646 (5.0)470 (72.8)176 (27.2)——
     Some college254 (19.6)190 (74.8)64 (25.2)——
     College graduate215 (16.6)187 (87.0)28 (13.0)——
    Race, n (%)———0.710.877
     White1,183 (91.3)895 (75.7)288 (24.3)——
     Black71 (5.4)52 (73.2)19 (26.8)——
     Hispanic22 (1.7)18 (81.8)4 (18.2)——
     Other19 (1.5)14 (73.7)5 (26.3)——
    Case type, n (%)———20.250.003
     Criminal16 (1.2)12 (75.0)4 (25.0)——
     Disability19 (1.5)16 (84.2)3 (15.8)——
     Fitness for duty33 (2.5)32 (97.0)1 (3.0)——
     Head injury527 (40.5)382 (72.5)145 (27.5)——
     Personal injury126 (9.7)109 (86.5)17 (13.5)——
     Worker’s compensation573 (44.1)427 (74.5)146 (25.5)——
     Other5 (0.4)4 (80.0)1 (20.0)——
    Lifetime presence of mental illness, n (%)———3.90.048
     No94 (7.2)79 (84.0)15 (16.0)——
     Yes1,206 (92.9)904 (75.0)302 (25.0)——
    Number of DSM-5 diagnostic categories met, n (%)———11.470.009
     094 (7.2)79 (84.0)15 (16.0)——
     1498 (38.3)393 (78.9)105 (21.1)——
     2454 (34.9)331 (72.9)123 (27.1)——
     ≥3254 (19.5)180 (70.9)74 (29.1)——
    • DSM-5 = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; GED = general equivalency diploma; SD = standard deviation. Not all comparisons utilize 1,300 observations, as some data were missing.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Comparison of Malingering Scales

    No MalingeringMalingering
    nn = 983n = 317
    Tests taken1,3009 (9–9)11 (10–11)
    TOMM-T21,24550 (49–50)40 (31–47)
     TOMM-T2 ≤ 4562 (6.7%)225 (71.9%)
    TOMM-R28146 (38–49)34 (29–40)
     TOMM-R ≤ 4530 (45.5%)202 (94.0%)
    VSVT-EZ1,22724 (24–24)22 (20–24)
     VSVT-EZ ≤ 70 (0%)5 (1.6%)
    VSVT-DIF1,22722 (18–24)10 (7–15)
     VSVT-DIF ≤ 712 (1.3%)100 (32.1%)
    LMT4390.96 (0.84–1)0.73 (0.6–0.87)
     LMT ≤ 93%78 (42.6%)228 (89.1%)
    MMPI F-r1,24974 (61–92)111 (92–120)
     MMPI F-r ≥ 100129 (13.7%)208 (67.1%)
    MMPI Fp-r1,24951 (42–59)68 (59–77)
     MMPI Fp-r ≥ 1006 (0.64%)40 (12.9%)
    MMPI Fs1,24966 (50–75)91 (74–115)
     MMPI Fs ≥ 10028 (3.0%)120 (38.7%)
    MMPI FBS-r1,24977 (67–86)90.5 (83–99)
     MMPI FBS-r ≥ 10018 (1.9%)73 (23.6%)
    MMPI RBS1,24980 (67–88)105 (92–114)
     MMPI RBS ≥ 10094 (10.0%)195 (62.9%)
    MMPI L-r1,24957 (52–66)62 (52–66)
     MMPI L-r ≥ 1000 (0%)0 (0%)
    • LMT = Letter Memory Test; MMPI F-r = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Infrequent Responses; MMPI FBS-r = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Fake Bad Scale Responses; MMPI Fp-r = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Infrequent Psychopathology Responses; MMPI Fs = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Infrequent Somatic Responses; MMPI L-r = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Underreporting Lie Responses; MMPI RBS = Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Response Bias Scale; TOMM-R = Test of Memory Malingering, Retention trial; TOMM-T2 = Test of Memory Malingering, Trial 2; VSVT-DIF = Victoria Symptom Validity Test, Difficult subscale; VSVT-EZ = Victoria Symptom Validity Test, Easy subscale.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Association Between Demographic and Clinical Factors and Malingering

    Odds Ratio (95% CI)Statisticp-Value
    Age1 (0.99–1.01)1.540.214
    Sex—2.40.121
     Female0.8 (0.6–1.06)——
     MaleRef——
    Education—11.050.0009
     Less than college2.16 (1.37–3.39)——
     College graduateRef——
    Race—1.270.737
     Black1.16 (0.66–2.04)——
     Hispanic0.58 (0.19–1.76)——
     Other1.11 (0.38–3.19)——
     WhiteRef——
    Referral type—13.160.001
     Personal attorney0.48 (0.32–0.72)——
     None0.47 (0.13–1.79)——
     Opposing attorneyRef——
    Case type—7.140.028
     Worker’s compensation1.47 (0.88–2.48)——
     Head injury1.90 (1.13–3.19)——
     OtherRef——
    Number of DSM-5 diagnostic categories met—10.440.015
     00.47 (0.25–0.89)——
     10.68 (0.47–0.98)——
     20.96 (0.67–1.38)——
     ≥3Ref ——
    • CI = confidence interval; DSM-5 = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition; GED = general equivalency diploma.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Retrospective Analysis of Rates of Malingering in a Forensic Psychiatry Practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Retrospective Analysis of Rates of Malingering in a Forensic Psychiatry Practice
Lillian J. Svete, William W. Tindell, Christopher J. McLouth, Timothy S. Allen
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2025, 53 (1) 26-34; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240083-24

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A Retrospective Analysis of Rates of Malingering in a Forensic Psychiatry Practice
Lillian J. Svete, William W. Tindell, Christopher J. McLouth, Timothy S. Allen
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2025, 53 (1) 26-34; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240083-24
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Hunger Strikes After Restricted Housing Reform
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • malingering
  • performance validity test
  • symptom validity test
  • education
  • psychiatric diagnosis
  • gender

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law