Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Article CommentaryAnalysis and Commentary

Problem-Solving Court Policies on Cannabis Use

Nathaniel P. Morris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2019, JAAPL.003883-19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003883-19
Nathaniel P. Morris
Dr. Morris is a Resident in Psychiatry at the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Examples of Problem-Solving Court Policies Toward Cannabis Use

    Court Policy Toward Cannabis UseSample Court Rules for ParticipantsSample Court Responses to Cannabis Use
    Abstinence-based approachDo not use or possess any drugs or alcohol … do not even think about applying for a [medical cannabis] card.65Take corrective actions.
    As a participant in the Adult Drug Treatment Court, you are agreeing not to use alcohol and other drugs … defendants with certificates for medical [cannabis] are not eligible for admission. A participant who obtains a certificate will be dismissed from the Court.67Corrective actions may include verbal warnings, increased court visit frequency, stricter drug test scheduling, delays of program graduation, brief stays in detention, or referral back to traditional criminal court.
    Tolerance-based approachThis court does not encourage cannabis use given its health risks and illegal status under federal law; however, we do not take punitive actions against participants in our court for using cannabis.*Do not take corrective actions.
    This court does not monitor participants for cannabis use.*Potentially educate participant about the health effects of cannabis use.
    Adaptive approachAs a participant in Drug Court, you are agreeing to not use alcohol, illegal drugs, or unauthorized medication. This includes medical [cannabis] unless authorized by the court.90Tailor response to individual participant's needs.
    Use of prescribed medical [cannabis] is presumptively prohibited and shall be reviewed by the Court on a case by case basis.92Consider whether participant has valid medical indication for cannabis use. Evaluate whether cannabis use appears to be harmful or helpful for the participant.
    • ↵* Proposed, rather than actual, examples of court rules for participants.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Problem-Solving Court Policies on Cannabis Use
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Problem-Solving Court Policies on Cannabis Use
Nathaniel P. Morris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2019, JAAPL.003883-19; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003883-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Problem-Solving Court Policies on Cannabis Use
Nathaniel P. Morris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2019, JAAPL.003883-19; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003883-19
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Types of Problem-Solving Courts
    • Prevalence of Cannabis Use
    • Eligibility Criteria
    • Identification of Cannabis Use
    • Responding to Participants' Cannabis Use
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law