Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Article CommentaryCommentary

Acquittal by Reason of Insanity Is a Positive Outcome for Defendants Who Cannot Be Restored

Joy Stankowski
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online April 2020, JAAPL.200002-20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200002-20
Joy Stankowski
Dr. Stankowski is Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, and Lead Chief Clinical Officer and Director of the Center for Forensic Excellence, Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare, OH, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, 1756 Sagamore Road, Northfield, OH 44067.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

JAAPL.200002-20
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200002-20
PubMed 
32321738

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online April 22, 2020.

Article Versions

  • You are currently viewing a Latest version of this article (April 22, 2020 - 09:35).
  • View the most recent version of this article
Copyright & Usage 
© 2020 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Joy Stankowski, MD
  1. Dr. Stankowski is Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, and Lead Chief Clinical Officer and Director of the Center for Forensic Excellence, Northcoast Behavioral Healthcare, OH, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, 1756 Sagamore Road, Northfield, OH 44067.
  1. E-mail: joy.stankowski{at}mha.ohio.gov.

Next
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Acquittal by Reason of Insanity Is a Positive Outcome for Defendants Who Cannot Be Restored
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Acquittal by Reason of Insanity Is a Positive Outcome for Defendants Who Cannot Be Restored
Joy Stankowski
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Apr 2020, JAAPL.200002-20; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200002-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Acquittal by Reason of Insanity Is a Positive Outcome for Defendants Who Cannot Be Restored
Joy Stankowski
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Apr 2020, JAAPL.200002-20; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200002-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Recovery in a Forensic Setting
    • Recovery and Conditional Release
    • Concern of Dangerousness
    • Resistance to Recovery
    • IST/NR versus NGRI
    • Improving Recovery
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Determining the Goals Toward Which Forensic Mental Health Practice Should Aspire
  • Flexibility and Innovation in Decisional Capacity Assessment
  • Forensic Neurology and the Role of Neurologists in Forensic Evaluations
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law