Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

Controlling for Confirmation Bias in Child Sexual Abuse Interviews

William O’Donohue and Olga Cirlugea
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2021, JAAPL.200109-20; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200109-20
William O’Donohue
University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olga Cirlugea
University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Bernet’s Taxonomy of Mechanisms by Which False Statements may Occur

    MechanismDefinition
    True allegationEstimated around 90% of the time.
    Parental misinterpretation and suggestionThe parent has taken an innocent remark or neutral piece of behavior, inflated it into something worse, and inadvertently induced the child to endorse his or her interpretation (p 904).
    Misinterpreted physical conditionA parent who is vindictive or overly anxious or a mental health professional who is misinformed may jump to the conclusion that a child’s injury or illness was caused by sexual abuse rather than accepting a more benign explanation (p 905).
    Parental delusionThe parent is a severely disturbed, paranoid person. He or she has actively shared a distorted world view with the child, who now shares the same delusion (p 905).
    Parental indoctrinationThe parent fabricated the allegation and instructed the child in what to say (p 905).
    Interviewer suggestionPrevious interviewers may have inadvertently contaminated the evidence by asking leading or suggestive questions (p 905).
    FantasyThe child may have confused fantasy and reality (p 905).
    DelusionAlthough rare, delusions about sexual activities may occur in older children and adolescents in the context of a psychotic illness (p 905).
    MisinterpretationA misinterpretation may also cause a false belief, but it is derived from something that actually happened in the first place (p 905).
    MiscommunicationA false allegation of abuse may arise out of a simple verbal misunderstanding (p 906).
    ConfabulationThe concept of confabulation usually implies that the patient fabricates statements or stories in response to questions about events that the person did not actually recall (p 906).
    Pseudologica phantasticaCalled fantasy lying and pathological lying . . . defined as telling false stories without discernible or adequate motive and with such zeal that the subject may become convinced of the truth (p 906).
    • From Reference 60.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 1
1 Mar 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Controlling for Confirmation Bias in Child Sexual Abuse Interviews
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Controlling for Confirmation Bias in Child Sexual Abuse Interviews
William O’Donohue, Olga Cirlugea
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2021, JAAPL.200109-20; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200109-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Controlling for Confirmation Bias in Child Sexual Abuse Interviews
William O’Donohue, Olga Cirlugea
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online May 2021, JAAPL.200109-20; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200109-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Evaluating Interviewer Bias
    • Mitigating Confirmation Bias
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • forensic interviews
  • error
  • confirmation bias
  • suggestibility
  • psychometrics

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law