Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

An Analysis of Risk-Assessment Driven Security Restraint Use during the Transport of Forensic Patients

Tobias D. Wasser, Bentley A. Strockbine, Lori L. Hauser, Merrill A. Mathew, Brian Gay, Hal E. Smith and Charles C. Dike
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online January 2022, JAAPL.210050-21; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.210050-21
Tobias D. Wasser
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bentley A. Strockbine
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lori L. Hauser
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Merrill A. Mathew
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Gay
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hal E. Smith
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
MPS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles C. Dike
Whiting Forensic Hospital, Middletown, CT. , Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Hartford, CT.
MBChB, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The risk assessment for transportation form.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Fraction of transports that required restraints by race and legal status.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic and Legal Status Factors Related to Use of Restraint during Transport

    Transports, nRestraint UsedNo Restraint Used
    Total transports802443 (55.2)359 (44.8)
    Gender
     Male683377 (55.2)306 (44.8)
     Female11966 (55.5)53 (44.5)
    Age
     < 60 years568357 (62.9)211 (37.1)
    ≥  60 years or older23486 (36.8)148 (63.2)
    Race
     White359177 (49.3)182 (50.7)
     Black277169 (61.0)108 (39.9)
     Hispanic15890 (57.0)68 (43.0)
     Alaska Native11 (100.0)0 (0.0)
     Asian or Pacific Islander76 (85.7)1 (14.3)
    Legal Status
     Voluntary4910 (20.4)39 (79.6)
     Civil14656 (38.4)90 (61.6)
     Competency397275 (69.3)122 (30.7)
     NGRI20597 (47.3)108 (52.7)
     Other55 (100.0)0 (0.0)
    Legal status by security level
     Maximum
      Voluntary2710 (37.0)17 (63.0)
      Civil8048 (60.0)32 (40.0)
      Competency141131 (92.9)10 (7.1)
      NGRI15297 (63.8)55 (36.2)
      Other55 (100.0)0 (0.0)
     Enhanced (Medium)
      Voluntary220 (0.0)22 (100.0)
      Civil668 (12.1)58 (87.9)
      Competency256144 (56.3)112 (43.7)
      NGRI530 (0.0)53 (100.0)
      Other00 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    Legal status by race
     White
      Voluntary160 (0.0)16 (100.0)
      Civil8121 (25.9)60 (74.1)
      Competency161108 (67.1)53 (32.9)
      NGRI9946 (46.5)53 (53.5)
      Other22 (100.0)0 (0.0)
     Black
      Voluntary188 (44.4)10 (55.6)
      Civil3920 (51.3)19 (48.7)
      Competency14794 (63.9)53 (36.1)
      NGRI7145 (63.4)26 (36.6)
      Other22 (100.0)0 (0.0)
     Hispanic
      Voluntary152 (13.3)13 (86.7)
      Civil2514 (56.0)11 (44.0)
      Competency8670 (81.4)16 (18.6)
      NGRI324 (12.5)28 (87.5)
      Other00 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    • Data are presented as n (%).

    • Voluntary = voluntary civil patient; Civil = civilly committed patient; Competency = patient admitted for competency restoration; NGRI = individual acquitted by reason of mental disease or defect (not guilty by reason of insanity); Other = individual hospitalized for other court-ordered evaluation.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Diagnostic Categories Related to Use of Restraint during Transport

    DiagnosisRestraint UsedNo Restraint UsedTotal
    Neurodevelopmental13 (68.4)6 (31.6)19 (2.4)
    Schizophrenia spectrum254 (55.9)200 (44.1)454 (56.6)
    Bipolar and related41 (68.3)19 (31.7)60 (7.5)
    Depressive22 (84.6)4 (15.4)26 (3.2)
    Obsessive-compulsive and related1 (33.3)2 (66.7)3 (0.4)
    Trauma and stressor-related12 (80.0)3 (20.0)15 (1.9)
    Disruptive, impulse control, and conduct11 (73.3)4 (26.7)15 (1.9)
    Substance-related and addictive16 (39.0)25 (61.0)41 (5.1)
    Neurocognitive37 (36.3)65 (63.7)102 (12.7)
    Personality13 (37.1)22 (62.9)35 (4.4)
    Paraphilic3 (37.5)5 (62.5)8 (1.0)
    No diagnosis20 (83.3)4 (16.7)24 (3.0)
    • Data are presented as n (%).

    • No diagnosis = no primary psychiatric diagnosis recorded at time of transport.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Risk Factor Categories Related to Use of Restraint during Transport

    Risk Factor CategoryRestraint UsedNo Restraint Used
    Behaviorala819 (78.3)227 (21.7)
    Historicalb173 (75.9)55 (24.1)
    Legal/socialc122 (81.9)27 (18.1)
    Protectived41 (9.4)397 (90.6)
    • Data are presented as n (%). Multiple risk factor rationales were identified for each transport occurrence; the total number of risk factors is therefore higher than the total sample size of 802 transports.

    • ↵a Behavioral risk factors included danger to self, danger to others, clinical instability, impulsivity, current aggression, limitation on communication/threatening/harassment, treatment noncompliance, recent substance use/withdrawal, and recent violence/elopement ideation.

    • ↵b Historical risk factors included any history of violence or elopement, unsuccessful temporary leave or conditional release, and unknown history.

    • ↵c Legal/social risk factors included felony charges, pending return to corrections, protective/restraining order, high bond or incarceration exposure, and significant pending community/family events.

    • ↵d Protective factors included significant clinical stability, treatment compliance, fear of leaving the hospital, and geriatric status or being medically compromised.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 2
1 Jun 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Analysis of Risk-Assessment Driven Security Restraint Use during the Transport of Forensic Patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An Analysis of Risk-Assessment Driven Security Restraint Use during the Transport of Forensic Patients
Tobias D. Wasser, Bentley A. Strockbine, Lori L. Hauser, Merrill A. Mathew, Brian Gay, Hal E. Smith, Charles C. Dike
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2022, JAAPL.210050-21; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210050-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
An Analysis of Risk-Assessment Driven Security Restraint Use during the Transport of Forensic Patients
Tobias D. Wasser, Bentley A. Strockbine, Lori L. Hauser, Merrill A. Mathew, Brian Gay, Hal E. Smith, Charles C. Dike
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2022, JAAPL.210050-21; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.210050-21
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
  • A Retrospective Analysis of Rates of Malingering in a Forensic Psychiatry Practice
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • restraint
  • forensic hospitals
  • risk assessment
  • transportation

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law