Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleAnalysis and Commentary

Legal Implications of Psychiatric Assessment for Medical Aid in Dying

Hira Hanif, Dale E. McNiel, Lois Weithorn and Renée L. Binder
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online July 2024, JAAPL.240042-24; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240042-24
Hira Hanif
Dr. Hanif is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow, Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology, and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Dr. Weithorn is a Professor of Law and the Harry & Lillian Hastings Research Chair, University of California Hastings College of Law, San Francisco, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dale E. McNiel
Dr. Hanif is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow, Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology, and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Dr. Weithorn is a Professor of Law and the Harry & Lillian Hastings Research Chair, University of California Hastings College of Law, San Francisco, CA.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lois Weithorn
Dr. Hanif is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow, Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology, and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Dr. Weithorn is a Professor of Law and the Harry & Lillian Hastings Research Chair, University of California Hastings College of Law, San Francisco, CA.
PhD, JD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renée L. Binder
Dr. Hanif is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow, Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology, and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director of the Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA. Dr. Weithorn is a Professor of Law and the Harry & Lillian Hastings Research Chair, University of California Hastings College of Law, San Francisco, CA.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Provisions for Mental Health Assessments in Medical Aid and Dying Legislation

    Legal MAIDYear EffectiveMental Health Assessment Requirement
    Oregon Death With Dignity Act261997“If in the opinion of the attending physician or consulting physician a patient may be suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment.”27
    Washington Death With Dignity Act282009“If, in the opinion of either the attending qualified medical provider or the consulting qualified medical provider, a patient may be suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment.”29
    Baxter v. Montana30a2009No legislation
    Vermont Patient Choice and Control at the End-of-Life Act312013“The physician either verified that the patient did not have impaired judgment or referred the patient for an evaluation by a psychiatrist, psychologist, or clinical social worker licensed in Vermont for confirmation that the patient was capable and did not have impaired judgment.”32
    California End of Life Option Act332016“If there are indications of a mental disorder, the physician shall refer the individual for a mental health specialist assessment.”34
    Colorado Proposition 106 End of Life Options Act352017“Refer the individual to a licensed mental health professional…if the attending physician believes that the individual may not be mentally capable of making an informed decision.”36
    DC Death with Dignity Act372017“If, in the opinion of the attending physician or consulting physician, a patient may be suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment.”38
    Hawai'i Our Care, Our Choice Act392019“The attending provider shall refer the patient for counseling. No medication . . . shall be prescribed until the person performing the counseling determines that the patient is capable, and does not appear to be suffering from undertreatment or nontreatment of depression or other conditions which may interfere with the patient’s ability to make an informed decision.”40
    An Act to Enact the Maine Death with Dignity Act92019“If, in the opinion of the attending physician or the consulting physician, a patient may be suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment.”41
    New Jersey Bill A1504 Aid in Dying for the Terminally Ill Act82019“If, in the medical opinion of the attending physician or the consulting physician, a patient…may not be capable, the physician shall refer the patient to a mental health care professional to determine whether the patient is capable.”42
    New Mexico Elizabeth Whitefield End of Life Options Act102021“If an individual has a current history of a mental health disorder or an intellectual disability that could cause impaired judgment…or if, in the opinion of the prescribing health care provider or consulting health care provider, an individual currently has a mental health disorder or an intellectual disability that may cause impaired judgment…”43
    • MAID, medical aid in dying. Data for this table were retrieved from the individual statutes.8,–,10,26,27,29–33

    • ↵aIn its 2009 decision Baxter v. Montana, the Montana Supreme Court ruled that assisted suicide did not violate Montana legal precedent or state statutes, but there is no legal protocol in place.30

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Shared Characteristics of Medical Aid in Dying Legislationa

    Eligibility Criteria
     Minimum age requirement of 18 years
     Residency requirementb
     Able to independently formulate and convey healthcare decisions
     Must be diagnosed with a terminal illness with an anticipated life expectancy of six months or less
    Clinician Requirements
     Licensed in the jurisdictionc
     Provide a diagnosis for the patient indicating a terminal illness anticipated to result in death within six months or fewer
     A clinician offering consultation is required to confirm both the terminal diagnosis and prognosis, in addition to ensuring that the patient has the capacity to make the decision
     As necessary, a recommendation for consultation with a mental health professional must be initiatedd
     Must provide the patient with counseling regarding available alternatives
    Additional Safeguards
     Two oral requests with a time interval in betweene
     A written request with a witness present
     The patient can withdraw the request at any given moment
     Healthcare professionals are not under any obligation to engage or partake
     The application of the law should not affect the standing of a patient’s health, life, or annuity insurance policies
    • Data for this table were retrieved from the individual statutes.8,–,10,26,28,31,33,35,37,39

    • ↵aMontana has legal MAID via court ruling, but there is no legal protocol in place, and therefore, the criteria in this table do not apply to Montana.30

    • ↵bOregon and Vermont do not have a residency requirement. There is ongoing litigation surrounding New Jersey’s residency requirement.26,31,84

    • ↵cIn New Mexico (10), Washington (28), and Hawaii (39), non-physician advanced practice professionals are authorized prescribers. Colorado’s statute, newly amended in 2024, will also permit this practice. once the amended law takes effect (35).

    • ↵dRefer to Table 1.

    • ↵eThis time frame ranges from 48 hours to 20 days.8,–,10,26,28,31,33,35,37,39 New Mexico does not have an oral request requirement.10 Oregon specifies that patients with less than 15 days left to live can skip the 15-day waiting period.26

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Medical Aid in Dying Litigation and Forensic Psychiatry

    Wrongful Death or Negligence Claims
     Allegations that a healthcare provider failed to comply with the legal requirements or safeguards or that the patient’s decision was influenced by coercion or mental incapacity. A forensic mental health professional may be asked to assess the deceased’s mental state, decision-making capacity, and the circumstances leading to their choice.
    Informed Consent Disputes
     Disagreements regarding whether the patient was able to provide informed consent for MAID may call for a forensic mental health professional to evaluate the patient’s capacity to make an informed choice.
    Coercion or Undue Influence Claims
     In situations where there are allegations of coercion or undue influence, a forensic mental health professional may be asked to assess the patient’s vulnerability and the extent of external pressures, helping to determine the validity of these claims.
    Compliance with Legal Safeguards
     A forensic mental health professional may be called upon to evaluate whether healthcare providers or institutions followed the legal safeguards for MAID, ensuring that the process adhered to the law and ethical standards.
    Wrongful Termination
     In cases where clinicians face wrongful termination for their engagement in or avoidance of MAID, a forensic mental health professional may be called upon to assess the mental and emotional state of the terminated clinician and to determine whether the clinician’s mental health was affected by the termination.
    • MAID, medical aid in dying.

Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 53 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 53, Issue 2
1 Jun 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Legal Implications of Psychiatric Assessment for Medical Aid in Dying
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Legal Implications of Psychiatric Assessment for Medical Aid in Dying
Hira Hanif, Dale E. McNiel, Lois Weithorn, Renée L. Binder
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jul 2024, JAAPL.240042-24; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240042-24

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Legal Implications of Psychiatric Assessment for Medical Aid in Dying
Hira Hanif, Dale E. McNiel, Lois Weithorn, Renée L. Binder
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jul 2024, JAAPL.240042-24; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240042-24
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Shifting Attitudes
    • Statutory Provisions in the United States
    • Assessing MAID for Mental Illness
    • Legal Controversies
    • Roles of Mental Health Experts
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Determining the Goals Toward Which Forensic Mental Health Practice Should Aspire
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MAID
  • medical aid in dying
  • assisted death
  • physician-assisted death
  • physician-assisted suicide

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law