A Judge's Three Worlds: Proof, Philosophy, and the Prison

  • Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
  • June 1988,
  • 16
  • (2)
  • 123-130;

Abstract

Tensions between the world of science and the world of law may arise because of their differing viewpoints and philosophies. Disagreements may center around such questions as what constitutes proof, around human behavior, and around the use of the insanity defense in criminal cases. The just deserts model is examined and is criticized as being harsh and possibly unrealistic in today's society.

Footnotes

  • This paper was presented at the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Philadelphia, October 18, 1986.

Loading
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Article Alerts
  • Email Article
  • Citation Tools
  • Request Permissions
  • Share