Abstract
Death row prisoners may elect to forgo appeals, thus hastening execution. There are many reasons for such a decision, including depression, psychosis, incompetence, conditions in prison, and others. Due to the gravity of the sentence, and the states' duty to ensure fairness, some jurisdictions impose restrictions on the waiver. An inmate who lacks trial competence may be subject to a habeas corpus hearing and the appointment of a "next friend," often a family member. Moreover, the Constitution forbids execution of the "insane." The decision, then, may be taken out of the inmate's hands. The author outlines the various tests for competence to waive appeals. The Pennsylvania case of Gary Heidnik (In re Heidnik, 112 F.3d 105 (3rd Cir. 1997); and In re Heidnik, 720 A.2d 1016 (Pa. 1998)) illustrates the issues surrounding waiver of appeals that concern psychiatrists, attorneys, and judges. Following a discussion of Heidnik and related cases, the author offers a proposal for a classification of types of inmates requesting waiver.
