Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Electroconvulsive Therapy: Administrative Codes, Legislation, and Professional Recommendations

Victoria Harris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2006, 34 (3) 406-411;
Victoria Harris
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statutory Laws and Administrative Codes Concerned with ECT and Adults

    StateVoluntary ECTInvoluntary PatientsInvoluntary ECTComments
    Arkansas22,23Nothing includedTreatment restrictions outlinedProbate court; clear and convincing evidence
    California24Requirements by treating physician articulated; must have three appointed physicians (two board-certified) who agree that patient has capacity to consent“… common knowledge mentally ill persons are more likely to lack the ability to understand the nature of a medical procedure and appreciate its risks. The special regulation of ECT is also a reasonable classification because procedures associated with mental illness, present a great danger of violating the patient’s rights.”
    Colorado25Requirements by treating physician articulatedMust include written information regarding “that there is a difference of opinion within the medical profession on the use of electroconvulsive treatment”
    Connecticut26Requires written consent that is valid for 30 daysNothing concerning involuntary patients. If patient is incompetent to consent: head of hospital, two physicians, and Court of Probate must agree that patient is incompetent and there is no other “reasonable alternative procedure.”
    Delaware27Requires written informed consent for voluntary ECT. Nothing in statutory laws or administrative codes about involuntary patients or involuntary ECT
    Illinois33–37Voluntary ECT not covered in legislationInvoluntary ECT does not require written notice of risks and benefits
    Minnesota47Nothing concerning voluntary ECTInvoluntary ECT requires that the person be found incompetent to make medical decisions. Court has ultimate decision-making capacity.
    Missouri49Voluntary ECT requires verbal and written informed consentInvoluntary ECT requires court order after full evidentiary hearing
    Montana50Consent to voluntary ECT must involve consent from patient and “… counsel, the legal guardian, if any, the friend of the respondent appointed by the court, and any other interested party of the patient’s choice….”
    Nebraska51Only requirements for licensed physician (psychiatrist) specified to perform ECT
    New York56–59Detailed guidelines regarding voluntary administration of ECTPerson must be found incompetent by the court for involuntary ECT to be administered
    North Carolina60Written, informed consent required for treatment
    Ohio62“No patient shall be subjected to [convulsive therapy]… until both the patient’s informed, intelligent, and knowing consent and the approval of the court have been obtained, except that court approval is not required for a legally competent and voluntary patient in a nonpublic hospital.”
    Oregon64Nothing in statutory laws or administrative codes about ECT and adultsInvoluntary patients specifically are not subject to ECT
    Pennsylvania65Nothing concerning voluntary ECTPowers and duties only granted by court includes consent for involuntary ECT
    South Dakota69,70Written infomed consent required for voluntary ECT“… court finds that the person is incapable of consenting to such treatment because the person’s judgement is so affected by the mental illness that the person lacks the capacity to make a competent, voluntary and knowing decision concerning such treatment, the court may exercise a substituted judgment on the administration….”
    Texas72–75Extensive requirements directed towards facilities (including registering the ECT machine) and physicians concerning informed consent. Two physicians are required to state that the procedure is medically necessary if the individual is older than 65 years.
    Vermont77Established a commissioner to oversee the use of ECT.
    Virginia79Nothing specific concerning voluntary ECTCourt may authorize ECT; clear and convincing evidence is the standard.
    Washington80Mental health directive may include provisions for ECT. Nothing specific about voluntary/ECT evaluation and consent process
    Alabama19; Alaska20; Arizona21; District of Columbia28; Florida29; Georgia30; Hawaii31; Idaho32; Indiana38; Iowa39; Kansas40; Kentucky41; Louisiana42; Maine43; Maryland44; Massachusetts45; Michigan46; Mississippi48; Nevada52; New Hampshire53; New Jersey54; New Mexico55; North Dakota61; Oklahoma63; Puerto Rico66; Rhode Island67; South Carolina68; Tennessee71; Utah76; Virgin Islands78; West Virginia81; Wisconsin82; Wyoming83Nothing in statutory laws or administrative codes about ECT and adults
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 34 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 34, Issue 3
September 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Electroconvulsive Therapy: Administrative Codes, Legislation, and Professional Recommendations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Electroconvulsive Therapy: Administrative Codes, Legislation, and Professional Recommendations
Victoria Harris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2006, 34 (3) 406-411;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Electroconvulsive Therapy: Administrative Codes, Legislation, and Professional Recommendations
Victoria Harris
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2006, 34 (3) 406-411;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law