Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Indiana v. Davis: Revisiting Due Process Rights of Permanently Incompetent Defendants

Douglas R. Morris and George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2009, 37 (3) 380-385;
Douglas R. Morris
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George F. Parker
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 37 no. 3 380-385
PubMed 
19767504

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online September 18, 2009.

Copyright & Usage 
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Douglas R. Morris, MD and
  2. George F. Parker, MD
  1. Dr. Morris is Volunteer Clinical Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, and Dr. Parker is Associate Professor of Clinical Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, IN. The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect official policies or positions of the Indiana University School of Medicine or the Indiana Division of Mental Health and Addictions
  1. Address correspondence to: Douglas R. Morris, MD, Logansport State Hospital, IRTC 833, 1098 South State Road 25, Logansport, IN 46947. E-mail: drdmo{at}hotmail.com

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 37 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 37, Issue 3
September 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Indiana v. Davis: Revisiting Due Process Rights of Permanently Incompetent Defendants
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Indiana v. Davis: Revisiting Due Process Rights of Permanently Incompetent Defendants
Douglas R. Morris, George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2009, 37 (3) 380-385;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Indiana v. Davis: Revisiting Due Process Rights of Permanently Incompetent Defendants
Douglas R. Morris, George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2009, 37 (3) 380-385;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Indiana v. Davis
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law