Article Figures & Data
Figures
- Figure 1.
Literature summary for hypothesis formulation.
Tables
F (df) p η2 VB 2.24 (1, 179) .14 .01 NVB 14.14 (1, 179) <.001 .07 VB × NVB 0.001 (1, 179) .96 <.001 Bold, significant predictor variable. VB, defendant verbal behavior; NVB, defendant nonverbal behavior.
- Table 2
Binary Logistic Regression of Defendant Behaviors Predicting Sentencing Recommendation
IV Beta SE Wald p OR OR 95% CI VB 1.57 0.62 6.58 .01 4.81 1.45–15.99 NVB 0.59 0.49 1.43 .23 1.80 0.68–4.71 VB × NVB −2.33 0.79 8.71 .003 l.10 0.02–0.46 Bold, significant predictor variable. IV, independent variable; SE, standard error of beta; OR, odds ratio; VB, defendant verbal behavior; NVB, defendant nonverbal behavior.
Low Verbal High Verbal Nonremorseful nonverbal 65.9% (27/41) 80.4% (37/46) Remorseful nonverbal 91.7% (44/48) 69.6% (32/46) Data are the percentage of the total group assigning a sentence of life without parole (number making the assignment/total group).
- Table 4
Binary Logistic Regression of Need for Affect Subscales Predicting Sentencing Recommendation
IV Beta S.E. Wald p OR OR 95% CI Approach 0.36 0.02 4.48 0.03 1.04 1.00–1.07 Avoidance 0.17 0.02 1.11 0.29 1.02 .98–1.05 Bold, significant predictor variable. IV, independent variable. SE, standard error of beta; OR, odds ratio.
