Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
EditorialEDITORIAL

The Quandary of Unrestorability

George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online April 2012, 40 (2) 171-176;
George F. Parker
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    State Competence Statutes: Time Allowed for Initial Restoration and Total Time Allowed for Restoration to Competence

    Initial Time for RTC 1 Year or LessTotal Time For RTC
    Fixed Limit (Time Allowed)*Maximum SentenceNo Limit if Civilly CommittableNo Statutory Limit
    AlabamaAlaska (1 year)ColoradoAlabamaDelaware
    AlaskaArizona (21 months)IowaArkansasHawaii (for felonies) (1)
    ArizonaFlorida (5 years)New Mexico (serious offenses)CaliforniaMaine
    ArkansasGeorgia (1 year)North DakotaConnecticutMississippi
    FloridaIllinois (3 years)Ohio (serious offenses)IdahoMissouri (1)
    GeorgiaLouisiana (5 years or max)South CarolinaIndianaMontana
    HawaiiMaryland (3, 5, 10 years or max)TexasKansasNebraska (1)
    IdahoMassachusetts (1/2 max)West VirginiaKentuckyNew Jersey (1)
    IllinoisMichigan (15 months)TennesseeWisconsin (1)
    IndianaMinnesota (1, 3 years)VermontWyoming (1)
    KansasNevada (10 years or max)
    KentuckyNew Hampshire (1 year)
    LouisianaNew York (2/3 of sentence)
    MassachusettsNorth Carolina (5, 10 years or max)
    MissouriOklahoma (2 years or max)
    NebraskaOregon (3 years or max)
    New HampshirePennsylvania (10 years or max, except murder)
    New JerseyRhode Island (2/3 max or 30 years)
    New MexicoSouth Dakota (16 months or max)
    New YorkUtah (1, 2.5, or 5.5 years)
    OhioVirginia (45 days, 5 years or max)
    South CarolinaWashington (1 year)
    South Dakota
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wisconsin
    Wyoming
    • ↵* max, maximum sentence.

    • ↵(1) Limited period of initial RTC.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    State Competence Statutes: Prediction of Probability of Restoration and Dismissal of Charges if Unrestored

    Requires Assessment of Probability of Restoration and Allows Dismissal of ChargesRequires Assessment of Probability of Restoration but Does Not Allow Dismissal of ChargesAllows Dismissal of Charges but Does Not Require Assessment of Probability of RestorationNo Requirement to Assess Probability of Restoration and Does Not Allow Dismissal of Charges
    Alabama (1)Indiana (4)ArkansasColorado
    AlaskaIowaMassachusettsDelaware (3)
    Arizona (1)Kentucky (1a)New YorkPennsylvania
    California (2)MississippiVermont
    Connecticut (1)Nebraska (1a)
    Florida (1a)South Dakota
    GeorgiaTennessee
    HawaiiUtah
    IdahoWisconsin (1) (3)
    Illinois (1a) (3)Wyoming
    Kansas
    Louisiana (1a)
    Maine
    Maryland
    Michigan (1)
    Minnesota (1)
    Missouri
    Montana
    Nevada (1a)
    New Hampshire (1)
    New Jersey
    New Mexico (3)
    North Carolina
    North Dakota (1)
    Ohio (1)
    Oklahoma (1)
    Oregon
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina (1) (3)
    Texas (5)
    Virginia (1)
    Washington
    West Virginia (1)
    • ↵(1) Assessment of probability of restoration at first evaluation.

    • ↵(1a) Outpatient evaluation only.

    • ↵(2) Assessment of probability of restoration if treated with antipsychotic medication.

    • ↵(3) Allows hearing for acquittal.

    • ↵(4) Dismissal of charges allowed by state Supreme Court decision.

    • ↵(5) Dismissal of misdemeanors only.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (2)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 2
1 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Quandary of Unrestorability
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Quandary of Unrestorability
George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Apr 2012, 40 (2) 171-176;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The Quandary of Unrestorability
George F. Parker
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Apr 2012, 40 (2) 171-176;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Challenges and Opportunities for Forensic Mental Health in Immigration Courts
  • State Hospital Rotations Allow Residents to Regain the Longitudinal Experiences of Yesteryear
  • Medical Misogyny and the Implications of Not Believing Women
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law