Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

Risk of Death for Veterans on Release From Prison

Hal S. Wortzel, Patrick Blatchford, Latoya Conner, Lawrence E. Adler and Ingrid A. Binswanger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2012, 40 (3) 348-354;
Hal S. Wortzel
Dr. Wortzel is Director of Neuropsychiatric Consultation, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)-19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, and Assistant Professor, Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Dr. Blatchford is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO. Ms. Conner is a Professional Research Assistant and Dr. Adler is Director (retired), VISN 19 MIRECC, Denver, CO. Dr. Binswanger is Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Blatchford
Dr. Wortzel is Director of Neuropsychiatric Consultation, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)-19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, and Assistant Professor, Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Dr. Blatchford is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO. Ms. Conner is a Professional Research Assistant and Dr. Adler is Director (retired), VISN 19 MIRECC, Denver, CO. Dr. Binswanger is Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Latoya Conner
Dr. Wortzel is Director of Neuropsychiatric Consultation, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)-19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, and Assistant Professor, Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Dr. Blatchford is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO. Ms. Conner is a Professional Research Assistant and Dr. Adler is Director (retired), VISN 19 MIRECC, Denver, CO. Dr. Binswanger is Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence E. Adler
Dr. Wortzel is Director of Neuropsychiatric Consultation, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)-19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, and Assistant Professor, Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Dr. Blatchford is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO. Ms. Conner is a Professional Research Assistant and Dr. Adler is Director (retired), VISN 19 MIRECC, Denver, CO. Dr. Binswanger is Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingrid A. Binswanger
Dr. Wortzel is Director of Neuropsychiatric Consultation, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN)-19 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, and Assistant Professor, Neurobehavioral Disorders Program and Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Dr. Blatchford is Assistant Professor, Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health and University of Colorado, Aurora, CO. Ms. Conner is a Professional Research Assistant and Dr. Adler is Director (retired), VISN 19 MIRECC, Denver, CO. Dr. Binswanger is Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We sought to determine, among veterans released from Washington state prisons from 1999 through 2003, the risk of death from all causes, whether those veterans have faced a higher risk of death than have nonveterans, and whether having VA benefits decreased the risk of death. We linked data from a retrospective cohort study to data from the Veterans Benefit Administration. Mortality rates were compared between veteran and nonveteran former inmates. The crude rate of veteran mortality was 1,195 per 100,000 person-years, significantly higher than that of nonveterans (p < .001), but adjustment for demographic factors demonstrated no significant increased risk. VA benefits were associated with a reduced risk for all-cause deaths (hazard ratio, .376; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.79). Veterans share the heightened risk of death after release from prison faced by all released inmates and should be included in efforts to reduce the risks associated with transitioning from prison to the community. VA benefits appear to offer a protective effect, particularly against medical deaths.

Estimates suggest that 10 percent of incarcerated persons in 2004 were veterans.1,2 Efforts by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to intervene and minimize the mortality risk associated with the time of release from correctional settings will be usefully guided by data pertaining to the risks faced by veterans released from prison. Establishing both the level of risk faced by veterans with a history of incarceration and the leading causes of death is essential to the successful development of meaningful interventions to improve coordination of care for veterans making the transition from prison to the community.

Prior studies have demonstrated that inmates face an increased risk of death, compared with the general population, following release from prison in the United States and abroad. Suicide was among the leading causes of death in studies conducted in the United States and the United Kingdom.3,–,7 In a retrospective cohort study of inmates released from the Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC), the adjusted risk of death among former inmates was 3.5 times that among other state residents (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.2–3.8). During the first two weeks after release, the risk of death among former inmates was 12.7 (95% CI, 9.2–17.4) times that among other state residents, with a markedly elevated relative risk of death from drug overdose (129; 95% CI, 89–186). The other leading causes of death among former inmates were cardiovascular disease, homicide, and suicide.4

The VA now officially recognizes that some veterans are arrested for a variety of offenses, some of which may be related to extended periods of battle readiness and combat exposure during multiple deployments and to maladaptive coping with the return to civilian life. The VA's Uniform Mental Health Services Package8 now calls not only for assistance for veterans re-entering the community from state and federal prisons, but also for outreach efforts to veterans who are interfacing with jails, courts, and law enforcement and for education of these agencies regarding mental health problems relevant to veteran populations, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI).

In the present investigation, we sought to identify the veterans released from Washington state prisons to calculate the risk of death faced by those veterans after release from prison; to investigate whether veterans had a higher risk of death after release from prison than did nonveterans; to assess whether veterans had a higher risk of suicide after release from prison than nonveterans; and to determine if veterans who had VA benefits (involving either pension or disability payments) demonstrated a decreased risk of death following their release from prison than those veterans without VA benefits. We hypothesized that veterans would face a higher risk of death after release from prison than would nonveterans and that this increased risk would be related to deaths due to injury caused by self or others, such as suicide. We also hypothesized that veterans with VA benefits would face a lower risk of death than would veterans without VA benefits.

Methods

Design

We conducted a data linkage study using data from a retrospective cohort study of inmates released from the Washington State DOC linked to data from the Veterans Benefit Administration (VBA) database. This study was approved by Veterans Affairs Research and Development, the Colorado Multi-institutional Review Board of the University of Colorado Denver, the Research Review Committee of the Washington State DOC, and the National Death Index (NDI).

Subjects

The study population included an original cohort of 30,237 inmates from a previous study4 of risk of death following release from prison. These former inmates were released from 1999 through 2003 from the State of Washington DOC. Releases were defined as any transition from prison to the community (including work release or halfway house), with or without community supervision, after an incarceration of any length of time. The investigators engaged the VBA to identify entries in its database that matched those in the Washington DOC database by first name, last name, sex, birth date (month, day, and year, within one year), and eight of the nine digits in the social security number. Data for 30,231 subjects were sent to the VBA for matching; requiring nonmissing data on all variables to match eliminated 10,353 (34%) of the subjects, but allowing one missing variable retained all but 6 subjects from the original 30,237, thereby leaving 30,231 for VBA matching. The VBA returned 3,806 matches, comprising our subgroup of veterans, which was compared with the 26,431 nonveterans for analyses pertaining to our first, second, and third goals. Of the 3,806 veterans, 573 (15.1%) received benefits from the VA. This group was compared with the 3,233 (84.9%) veterans who did not receive benefits from the VA in the analysis for our fourth goal.

Data

The primary outcome measure was all-cause deaths. Deaths were identified using the National Death Index, by methods that have been described.4 Causes of death were obtained from the National Death Index-Plus. Deaths were categorized based on underlying cause listings. Two categories of cause of death were created: those caused by injury by self or others (including overdose, suicide, homicide, and motor vehicle accidents) and those caused by medical events (including HIV, cardiovascular, liver-related, diabetes, cancer, and COPD). Secondary outcome measures were deaths from injury by self or others, medical deaths, suicide, alcohol or drug overdose, homicide, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The primary predictor variable of veteran status was obtained from the VBA. The electronic database (Offender-Based Tracking System) of the Washington State DOC provided the other covariates. These included sex, race, ethnicity, age, and length of incarceration (in years) for each prison stay that ended in a release during the study period. Age was assessed in decades for ease of interpretation of the resultant hazard ratios.

Analysis

Death rates were calculated as deaths over person-time at risk in the community, excluding time in prison during subsequent incarcerations. The veteran and nonveteran death rates were compared by using the exact test based on the binomial distribution, and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons by using the Holm procedure. The question of primary interest was whether time to death changed significantly with veteran status, with adjustment for the demographic variables sex, race, and age and the length of incarceration. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model the effect of continuous and categorical covariates on time-to-event data.9,10 The effect of each covariate on time to death was assessed from the calculated hazard ratio (HR) and associated 95% CI. First, the unadjusted effect of veteran status on the different types of death was estimated, followed by a fitting of separate adjusted models for each of the eight different types of death. The Cox regression model was used to determine the effect of receiving benefits from the VA on time until death, again with control for the same covariates as in the primary analysis. The assumption of proportional hazards was tested according to the method of Lin and Wei,11 in which the observed score process is compared with the simulated score processes for each covariate. The p value for the test of proportional hazards is based on the results of performing a Kolmogorov-type supremum test. We performed 1,000 simulations for these tests. Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The number of releases for each inmate varied from 1 to 10 (mean = 1.28, standard deviation = 0.66). Eighty percent of the inmates had a single release, and the other 20 percent had multiple releases, ranging from 2 to 10. Multiple releases of a single inmate may be correlated, and this within-subject correlation was accounted for in the analysis. The analysis applied the method of Lin and Wei12 to sum the score residuals for each inmate using the PHREG procedure in SAS PROC, thus achieving a robust sandwich estimate of the covariance matrix.

Results

Of the 30,231 subjects sent to the VBA for matching, 3,806 individuals with veteran status were identified. The demographic characteristics of the veteran subgroup and the leading causes of death for released veterans are depicted in Table 1. Similar to nonveterans released from prison, released veterans most frequently died of overdose, cardiovascular disease, cancer, hepatic disease, homicide, motor vehicle accidents, and suicide. Table 2 compares the veteran subgroup to the nonveteran population by various demographic factors. Released veterans were on average 7.5 years older than released nonveteran inmates. Of the 3,806 released veterans identified, 89 died during the study period, and 12 of these deaths occurred in the first month following prison release.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Veteran Demographics, Causes of Death and Frequency

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Demographic Characteristics of Veterans Versus Nonveterans

For all-cause deaths, the crude veteran death rate was 1,195 per 100,000 person-years of risk, significantly higher than the death rate of 714 observed for the nonveterans (p < .001). For the majority of the causes of death, a higher crude death rate was observed in veterans than in nonveterans (Table 3). For example, the veteran death rate from cardiovascular causes was 2.7 times greater than it was for nonveterans (175 versus 52 per 100,000 person-years of risk, p = .021).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Crude Mortality Rates of Veterans and Nonveterans

Although the unadjusted model demonstrates an increased risk for all-cause deaths, overdose, cardiovascular, cancer, and medical causes among veterans compared with nonveterans, models adjusted for the demographic covariates sex, race, age, and length of incarceration indicated that veteran status was not a statistically significant risk factor for any of the types of death investigated (Table 4). Of the 3,806 veterans identified, 573 had received some form of VA benefits. Having VA benefits appeared to offer a protective effect in terms of all-cause deaths for veterans. The hazard ratio associated with having VA benefits for all-cause deaths was .376 (95% CI, 0.18–0.78). The protective effect of VA benefits for deaths resulting from medical causes produced a hazard ratio of .262 (95% CI, 0.08–0.82).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4

Veteran Status and Risk for Various Types of Death

Discussion

Released veterans, in terms of all-cause deaths, faced higher crude death rates than nonveteran released inmates, although veteran status did not prove to be a significant risk factor after adjustment for key sociodemographic characteristics. Appreciating the import of results in this study necessitates consideration of the high-risk comparison group against which death rates for released veterans were measured. The general former inmate population had a risk of death 3.5 times that of other state residents, with a risk 12.7 times higher during the first two weeks following release. The finding that having VA benefits was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause deaths, in particular medical deaths, suggests that benefits and access to care mitigates risk among veterans released from prison. Additional research is needed to determine more precisely any relationship between VA benefits and the risk of death after release, potentially taking into account the amount and type of benefits received.

Although veteran status itself does not appear to be a risk factor for death, for certain causes of death, service-related neuropsychiatric injuries (such as PTSD or TBI) potentially interact with the risk associated with prisoner status or release from prison, potentially placing such veterans at higher risk compared with their nonveteran counterparts.13 We thus hypothesized that service-related neuropsychiatric injuries combined with stressors related to prison release would lead to increased rates of death by suicide among veterans. However, veterans' death rates for deaths caused by self or other or any of the individual causes of death subsumed under this category (suicide, homicide, overdose, motor vehicle accident) did not significantly exceed those of nonveteran prisoners. Given the high rates previously established for this population of released prisoners and current results, it seems likely that veterans share in the elevated risk for death caused by self or others. Efforts to direct released veterans to appropriate community and VA resources to mitigate such risks appear to be warranted.

The increase in crude death rates observed for veterans in this investigation seems to have been driven in large part by medical causes, a finding that may comport with the fact that the veteran group was on average seven years older. After adjustment for sociodemographic variables (including age), the veterans did not appear to be at increased risk for medical death. Nevertheless, the high rates of medical deaths observed in this population of released veterans warrant attention, particularly if access to care might mitigate such risk. In addition, the medical literature suggests that in-theater exposures can increase specific types of medical risk for veterans. For instance, some literature reports that in-theater exposures may elevate the risk for particular types of cancers for veterans.14,15 Recent studies of the relationship between coronary artery disease or subclinical atherosclerosis and combat exposure generally do not support an association.16,17 However, anxiety disorders (including PTSD) and depression are both associated with increased cardiovascular disease,18,–,20 and both have been reported to increase risk of myocardial infarction within a veteran population.21 Therefore, although combat exposure per se may not yield cardiovascular disease, it perhaps leads to increased rates of mood or anxiety disorders, which may then cause cardiovascular disease and death. More research is needed for a better characterization of the rate and nature of medical deaths observed among released veterans.

Limitations of the present investigation include the reliance on data derived from a single state, as the prison system in Washington may not be representative of other regions or of the nation as a whole. The results should be interpreted in the context of the release dates (1999–2003), given that more veterans are now returning from conflicts in the Middle East. Given the end release date of 2003, representation of veterans of Iraq or Afghanistan was low. This new generation of veterans may have different rates of death and criminal justice involvement than those in our study population. Further investigation expanding the release date to capture new returning veterans is indicated.

This study involved matching a correctional database, VBA database, and the National Death Index to assess health outcomes. Use of data linkage procedures among correctional, veteran, and community resources affords the opportunity to measure health outcomes and health care processes in vulnerable populations, affording data that may be used to investigate a variety of otherwise inaccessible research questions. Such methods could be used for comparative effectiveness research in the future. We believe that our database matching procedure produced accurate data. The procedure identified 3,806 (12.59%) veterans within the overall released inmate population consisting of 30,237 individuals. This findings is in line with relatively recent data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), indicating that in 2004, 10 percent of state prisoners reported prior service in the U.S. Armed Forces.1 The BJS found that veterans in state and federal prisons in 2004 were almost exclusively male (99%), consistent with our finding that 98.6 percent of released veteran inmates were male. The BJS reported that veterans in state prisons were about 12 years older than nonveterans on average; veterans in our study population were on average 7.5 years older. The BJS reported that an estimated 62 percent of veterans received an honorable discharge; we observed honorable discharge status in 77 percent of released veterans. Given the different years captured in our dataset, our focus on released persons (as opposed to those actively incarcerated), and that our data reflect the released inmate population from only a single state, the common trends and modest differences between present demographic findings and BJS data generally support the validity of our matching procedure and lend confidence to results.

The present investigation suggests that veterans share the increase in risk of death previously established for persons released from prison, and succumb to the same leading causes of death. These findings lend support to recent expansions by the VA to serve veterans transitioning from correctional settings back into the community. Results of a recent investigation by Webb et al.22 suggested that elevation in suicide risk is associated more diffusely with justice involvement; risk was elevated even among individuals without custodial sentences or guilty verdicts. Whether justice-involved veterans share this elevation in risk more diffusely associated with involvement with the criminal justice system remains to be determined. The VA's Veterans Justice Outreach Initiative is already seeking to mitigate such risk, identifying justice-involved veterans in need and directing them to appropriate medical and mental health services. Although mental health and substance abuse treatment represent needs for many in this population, the present investigation also suggests a need for general medical services, arguing for further integration of care between behavioral and general medical systems of care. Perhaps the advent and expansion of services targeting the justice-involved veteran will help mitigate the risk of death faced by released veterans and serve as a broader model for the nation in terms of the potential benefits derived from sealing the gaps between correctional and community systems of care. Further research is warranted to explore this supposition.

Conclusions

In this study, we determined that released veterans faced a higher crude death rate from all causes than nonveteran released inmates and that this excess in veteran deaths was largely driven by medical deaths, in particular deaths due to cancer and cardiovascular disease. However, veteran status did not prove to be a risk factor for death when corrections were made for other key sociodemographic variables. Veterans appear to share in the heightened risk of death due to injury by self or others (such as suicide) that has been established for the general released inmate population. Having benefits from the VA seems to offer some degree of protection, particularly in medical deaths. Such findings lend support to recently expanded VA programming aimed at identifying justice-involved veterans and directing them toward appropriate medical and mental health resources. Additional research is warranted for a more precise characterization of the medical and neuropsychiatric status of the justice-involved veteran population, to support program development specifically tailored to this at-risk population's needs.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Washington State Department of Corrections and Dr. Marc Stern for their vital collaboration and contributions to this study.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the Eastern Colorado VA Health Care System's Research Enhancement Award Program in Health Services Research. Dr. Binswanger was supported by Grant K12HS019464 from the Robert Wood Johnson Physician Faculty Scholars Program, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and Grant 1R21DA031041-01 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the National Institutes of Health, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2012 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Noonan M
    : Veterans in state and federal prison. 2004. Available at http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=808. Accessed June 27, 2012
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mumola C
    : Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Veterans in prison or jail. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2000
  3. 3.↵
    1. Merrall EL,
    2. Kariminia A,
    3. Binswanger IA,
    4. et al
    : Meta-analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction 105: 1545– 54, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Binswanger IA,
    2. Stern MF,
    3. Deyo RA,
    4. et al
    : Release from prison: a high risk of death for former inmates. N Engl J Med 356: 157– 65, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pratt D,
    2. Piper M,
    3. Appleby L,
    4. et al
    : Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 368: 119– 23, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pritchard C,
    2. Cox M,
    3. Dawson A
    : Suicide and ‘violent' death in a six-year cohort of male probationers compared with pattern of mortality in the general population: evidence of accumulative socio-psychiatric vulnerability. J R Soc Health 117: 180– 5, 1997
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rosen DL,
    2. Schoenbach VJ,
    3. Wohl DA
    : All-cause and cause-specific mortality among men released from state prison, 1980–2005. Am J Public Health 98: 2278– 84, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Information and recommendations for services provided by VHA facilities to veterans in the criminal justice system. April 30, 2009. Available at http://www1.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=1762. Accessed June 27, 2012
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cox DR
    : Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; B34: 187– 220
  10. 10.↵
    1. Allison PD
    : Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1995
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lin D,
    2. Wei LJ,
    3. Ying Z
    : Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of Martingale-based residuals. Biometrika 70: 557– 72, 1993
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lin DY,
    2. Wei LJ
    : The robust inference for the proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 84: 1074– 8, 1989
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wortzel HS,
    2. Binswanger IA,
    3. Anderson CA,
    4. et al
    : Suicide among incarcerated veterans. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 37: 82– 91, 2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Levine PH,
    2. Young HA,
    3. Simmens SJ,
    4. et al
    : Is testicular cancer related to Gulf War deployment?—evidence from a pilot population-based study of Gulf War era veterans and cancer registries. Mil Med 170: 149– 53 2005
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Young HA,
    2. Maillard JD,
    3. Levine PH,
    4. et al
    : Investigating the risk of cancer in 1990–1991 US Gulf War veterans with the use of state cancer registry data. Ann Epidemiol 20: 265– 72, 2010
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Johnson AM,
    2. Rose KM,
    3. Elder GH Jr.,
    4. et al
    : Military combat and burden of subclinical atherosclerosis in middle aged men: the ARIC study. Prev Med 50: 277– 81, 2010
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Johnson AM,
    2. Rose KM,
    3. Elder GH Jr.,
    4. et al
    : Military combat and risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke in aging men: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Ann Epidemiol 20: 143– 50, 2010
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fan AZ,
    2. Strine TW,
    3. Jiles R,
    4. et al
    : Depression and anxiety associated with cardiovascular disease among persons aged 45 years and older in 38 states of the United States, 2006. Prev Med 46: 445– 50, 2008
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ford DE,
    2. Mead LA,
    3. Chang PP,
    4. et al
    : Depression is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in men: the precursors study. Arch Intern Med 158: 1422– 6, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Frasure-Smith N,
    2. Lesperance F
    : Depression and anxiety as predictors of 2-year cardiac events in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 62– 71, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Scherrer JF,
    2. Chrusciel T,
    3. Zeringue A,
    4. et al
    : Anxiety disorders increase risk for incident myocardial infarction in depressed and nondepressed Veterans Administration patients. Am Heart J 159: 772– 9, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Webb RT,
    2. Qin P,
    3. Stevens H,
    4. et al
    : National study of suicide in all people with a criminal justice history. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68: 591– 9, 2011 ses rate?
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 3
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk of Death for Veterans on Release From Prison
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risk of Death for Veterans on Release From Prison
Hal S. Wortzel, Patrick Blatchford, Latoya Conner, Lawrence E. Adler, Ingrid A. Binswanger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 348-354;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Risk of Death for Veterans on Release From Prison
Hal S. Wortzel, Patrick Blatchford, Latoya Conner, Lawrence E. Adler, Ingrid A. Binswanger
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 348-354;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law